Hybrid warfare and hybrid threats today and tomorrow: towards an analytical framework

Open access

Abstract

This article first traces the origin of hybrid warfare and the label game surrounding the concept, asking whether it is merely old wine in a new bottle, and if so, whether it is still a useful concept. It is found that while being old wine in new bottles, it is still a good wine well worth drinking. While there is not much new in the concept itself, it is a useful tool to think about past wars, today’s wars and the wars of the future. Thereafter, this paper analyses how hybrid warfare and hybrid threats are to be understood in the context of peace, conflict and war. It is shown how hybrid warfare and threats fit into our traditional understanding of conflict dynamics.

Berdal, Mats ‘The “New Wars” Thesis Revisited’ in Hew Strachan and Sibylle Scheipers (eds), The Changing Character of War, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 109-10.

Galeotti, Mark. 2016. Hybrid War or Gibridnaya Voina? Getting Russia’s non-linear military challenge right: Mayak Intelligence.

Galeotti, Mark, and Andrew S. Bowen. 2014. “Putin’s Empire of the Mind.” Foreign Policy, 2014. 206.

Bērziņš, Jānis. 2014a. Russia’s New Generation Warfare in Ukraine: Implications for Latvian defense policy. Riga: National Defence Academy of Latvia, Center for Security and Strategic Studies.

Bērziņš, Jānis. 2014b. Russian “New Generation Warfare”: More democracy is the solution. Deterrence Paper No. 5, January 29 Washington: Center for European Policy Analysis.

Jordan, David, James Kiras, David J. Lonsdale, Ian Speller, Christopher Tuck, and C. Dale Walton. 2016. Understanding modern warfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nicander, Lars and Linnea Arnevall. 2015. “‘Fingret i magen‘: Ryska utmaningar för svensk-finskt försvarspolitiskt tänkande.” KKrv Handlingar & Tidskrift 4: 129–35.

Mansoor, Peter R. 2012. “Introduction: Hybrid Warfare in History.” In Hybrid Warfare: Fighting Complex Opponents from the Ancient World to the Present, edited by Williamson Murray and Peter R. Mansoor, 1–17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marshall, Tim, and John Scarlett. 2016. Prisoners of Geography: Ten maps that tell you everything you need to know about global politics. Revised and updated edition. London: Elliott and Thompson Limited.

Polese, Abel, Rob Kevlihan, and Donnacha Ó Beacháin. 2016. “Introduction: Hybrid warfare in post-Soviet spaces, is there a logic behind?” Small Wars & Insurgencies 27 (3): 361–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2016.1151660.

Reichborn-Kjennerud, Erik, and Patrick Cullen. 2016. What is Hybrid Warfare? NUPI Policy Brief, 26 Feb. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. Accessed 2 April, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2380867.

Renz, Bettina. 2016. “Russia and ‘hybrid warfare’.” Contemporary Politics 22 (3): 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1201316.

Swanström, Niklas, and Mikael Weissmann. 2005. Conflict, conflict prevention, conflict management and beyond. Uppsala: Silk Road Studies Program. Accessed 2 April, 2019. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/113660/2005_swanstrom-weissman_concept-paper_conflict-prevention-management-and-beyond.pdf.

Swedish Armed Forces. 2016. Militärstrategisk doktrin [Military Strategic Doctrine]: MSD 16. Stockholm: Swedish Armed Forces (Försvarsmakten).

Swedish Armed Forces. 2018. Tillväxt för ett starkare försvar [Growth for a stronger defence]: Slutredovisning av försvarsmaktens perspektivstudie 2016-2018. Stockholm: Swedish Armed Forces (Försvarsmakten). Accessed 2 April, 2019. https://www.forsvarsmakten.se/siteassets/4-om-myndigheten/dokumentfiler/perspektivplan/slutlig-redovisning-av-perspektivstudien-2016-2018.pdf.

Journal Information

A publication of the Baltic Defence College

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 39 39 39
PDF Downloads 47 47 47