The article considers traditional and non-traditional security concerns faced by the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in the face of China’s increasing presence. Consequently the article first considers the geo-economic challenges posed to these Baltic States through the China and Central and East Europe Countries (CCEEC) grouping, and China’s Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB) initiative. This economic leverage translates to political leverage able to be exerted on the Baltic states by China, with regard to human rights and the issue of the Dalai Lama. Moreover, such mechanisms and Chinese financing serves to politically divide the Baltic states, and also divides EU solidarity vis-à-vis China. Finally there are the conventional security issues posed to the Baltic states in the Russia-China naval exercises carried out in Baltic waters in 2017; with China’s role in effect providing implicit support and legitimisation of explicit Russian threats in the Baltic. It concludes by suggesting alternative infrastructure routings to at least reduce the threat of Russian interference.
Berzina-Cerenkova, U. (2016). Transport and Connectivity: the Inclusion of the Baltic States. In M. Andzans, ed., Afterthoughts: Riga 2016 International Forum of China and Central and Eastern European Countries, Riga: Latvian Institute of International Affairs, pp. 50-52.
Jakóbowski, J. and M. Kaczmarski. (2017) Beijing’s Mistaken Offer: the ‘16+1’ and China’s Policy Towards the European Union. OSW Commentary, No. 250, 15 Aug.
Juntenen, A. (2010). The Baltic Sea and Russian Strategy. Kungl KrigsvetenskapsAkademiens Handlingar och Tidsskrift, No. 4, pp. 120-124.
Kaczmarski, M. (2016). Europe in China’s policy during the rule of Xi Jinping. OSW Studies, No. 56, Apr.
Kaczmarki, M. and Rodkiewicz, W. (2017) The Russian-Chinese Naval Exercise in the Baltic Sea. Analyses (OSW), 26 July.
Kalendienė, J., Pukelienė, V. and Dapkus, M. (2017). Nordic-Baltic Countries and China: Trends in Trade and Investment: A Business Perspective. In J-P Larcon, ed., New Silk Road: China Meets Europe in the Baltic Sea Region. Singapore: World Scientific, pp. 77-104.
Long, J. (2016). The Transition of EU’s Attitude Towards ‘16+1. In M. Andžāns and A. Sprūds, eds. Afterthoughts: Riga 2016 International Forum of China and Central and Eastern European Countries, Riga: Latvian Institute of International Affairs, pp. 25-28.
Makocki, M. (2016). One Way Train from China to Central Europe. In M. Andžāns, ed., Afterthoughts: Riga 2016 International Forum of China and Central and Eastern European Countries, Riga: Latvian Institute of International Affairs, pp. 43-45.
Spisak, A. (2017). EU Uneasy over China’s Efforts to Woo Central and Eastern European States. Financial Times, 8 May.
Spruds, A. (2017). Towards a Balanced Synergy of Visions and Interests: Latvia’s Perspectives in 16+1 and Belt and Road Initiatives, Croatian International Relations Review, Vol. 23 (No. 78), pp. 37-56.
Tsuruoka, D. (2017). Finland Could Serve as China’s Arctic gateway for Obor. Asia Times, 2 July.
Tucker, J and Veliste, M. (2017) China’s Mixed Message in the Baltic. ISDP Voices (Institute for Development and Security Study, 28 Aug. [online] Available at http://isdp.eu/chinas-mixed-message-baltic/. [Accessed 14 Feb. 2018]
Veebel, V. (2016) The China’s New Silk Road Initiative: Why is Estonia Rather Cautious about It? In M. Andzans, ed, Afterthoughts: Riga 2016 International Forum of China and Central and Eastern European Countries, Riga: Latvian Institute of International Affairs, 2016, pp. 53-57.