Does Latvia Matter in Regional Geopolitics?

Open access


As early as 1994, scholars, analysts and policymakers began to wonder the extent to which the Baltic States mattered in the relationship between Russia and the West. The general consensus for the following 20 years was that the Baltic States matter considerably, especially following their inclusion in both the EU and NATO in 2004. However, in the past few years two trends have emerged which begin to call this accepted knowledge into question. First, the relationship between Russia and the West has turned more hostile following nearly 20 years of detente. The West insists (especially NATO) insists that it is within its right to protect states that were formerly part of the Soviet Union/Russia’s “near abroad”. Russia, on the other hand, insists that NATO incursion into the “shared neighborhood” is a violation of trust and overstepping normal geopolitical bounds.

Second, the Baltic States who once presented something of a united front for the West against Russia, no longer appear to have a common approach to foreign policy. While Estonia leans toward Scandinavia, and Lithuania leans toward Poland and Ukraine, Latvia is a bit of an odd man out with nowhere to turn. Furthermore, even other states in the Shared Neighborhood no longer seem to see Latvia as a valuable ally within the West. Considering this state of affairs, this paper considers whether Latvia matters anymore in regional geopolitics, or whether they are losing relevance.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ABERBACH J.D. and ROCKMAN B.A. 2002. Conducting and Coding Elite Interviews. PS: Political Science and Politics 35(4) pp. 673-676.

  • ABESADZE O. 2015. The Influence of European Neighbouring Policy Upon the Economic Development of Georgia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 213 pp. 557-561.

  • ARBATOVA N.K. and DYNKIN A.A. 2016. World Order after Ukraine. Survival 58(1) pp. 71-90.

  • BBC RUSSIAN SERVICE 2016 26 February 2016. Why NATO Would Not be Able to Contain Russia within the Baltic States. BBC.

  • BECHEV D. 2015. Understanding the Contest Between the EU and Russia in Their Shared Neighborhood. Problems of Post-Communism 62(6) pp. 340-349.

  • BERGMANE U. 28 June 2017 2017-last update What the Riga Elections Say about Latvian Politics [Homepage of Foreign Policy Research Institute] [Online]. Available: [8 august 2017].

  • BILDT C. 1994. The Baltic Litmus Test. Foreign Affairs 73(5) pp. 72-85.

  • BOEDELTJE F. and VAN HOUTUM H. 2011. Brussels is Speaking: The Adverse Speech Geo-Politics of the European Union Towards its Neighbours. Geopolitics 16(1) pp. 130-145.

  • BRAW E. 2015. Bully in the Baltics: The Kremlin’s Provocations. World Affairs March/April pp. 31-38.

  • BRUGE I. 2015. The Baltic States Foreign Policies: Relations with Russia and the Impact of the Ukraine Conflict. Russian Analytical Dialogue 176.

  • BUSCANEANU S. 2015. EU Democracy Promotion in Eastern ENP Countries. East European Politics & Societies 29(1) pp. 248-286.

  • CHARAP S. and SHAPIRO J. 2016. US-Russia Relations: The Middle Cannot Hold.

  • CLEM D.R.S. 2016. Geopolitics and Planning for a High-end Fight: NATO and the Baltic Region. Air & Space Power Journal 2016(Spring).

  • COTTEY A. 2012. Regionalism and the EU’s neighbourhood policy: the limits of the possible. Journal of Southeast European & Black Sea Studies 12(3) pp. 375-391.

  • CROCKER C.A. 2015. The Strategic Dilemma of a World Adrift. Survival 57(1) pp. 7-30.

  • DIMITROVOVA B. 2012. Imperial re-bordering of Europe: the case of the European Neighborhood Policy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25(2) pp. 249-267.

  • DRAGAN G. 2015. Deepening the economic integration in the Eastern Partnership: from a Free Trade Area to a Neighborhood Economic Community? Eastern Journal of European Studies 6(2) pp. 9-26.

  • FIOTT D. 2016. Modernising NATO’s Defence Infrastructure with EU Funds. Survival 58(2) pp. 77-94.

  • FOX B. 2013 3 June 2013. Russia summit and Latvian euro membership top bill this WEEK. EU Observer.

  • FRUHLING S. and LASCONJARIAS G. 2016. NATO A2/AD and the Kaliningrad Challenge. Survival 58(2) pp. 95-116.

  • GALBREATH D.J. and LAMOREAUX J.W. 2013. Latvia: On the Push-Pull Effects of a Small State in the EU. In: M. BAUN and D. MAREK eds The New Member States and the European Union: Foreign Policy and Europeanization. New York: Routledge pp. 112-126.

  • GALBREATH D.J. and LAMOREAUX J.W. 2007. Bastion Beacon or Bridge? Conceptualising the Baltic Logic of the EU’s Neighborhood. Geopolitics 12(1) pp. 109-132.

  • ISTRATE L. 2012. The Baltic States between the Old and New Europe. the Benefits of Lisbon Treaty for Lithuania Latvia and Estonia. Romanian Review on Political Geography/Revista Româna Geografie Politica 14(1) pp. 45-50.

  • JOENNIEMI P. 2012. Turning into a Sovereign Actor? Probing the EU Through the Lens of Neighborhood. Geopolitics 17(1) pp. 25-46.

  • KARA-MURZA V.V. 2015. Russia and the Baltics: Once Friend Now Foe. World Affairs 2015(January/February).

  • KAZHARSKI A. and MAKARYCHEV A. 2015. Suturing the Neighborhood? Russia and the EU in Conflictual Intersubjectivity. Problems of Post-Communism 62(6) pp. 328.

  • KESA K. 2011. Latvian and Lithuanian Policy in the Eastern Neighborhood: Between Solidarity and Self Promotion. Perspectives: Central European Review of International Affairs 19(2) pp. 81-100.

  • KĻAVIŅŠ D. ROSTOKS T. and OZOLIŅA Ž 2014. Foreign Policy “On the Cheap”: Latvia’s Foreign Policy Experience from the Economic Crisis. Journal of Baltic Studies 45(4) pp. 435-456.

  • KROENIG M. 2015. Facing Reality: Getting NATO Ready for a New Cold War. Survival 57(1) pp. 49-70.

  • LUKIN A. 2015. Russia in a Post-Bipolar World. Survival 58(1) pp. 91-112.

  • MADE V. 2011. Shining in Brussels? The Eastern Partnership in Estonia’s Foreign Policy. Perspectives: Central European Review of International Affairs 19(2) pp. 67-79.

  • MAKARYCHEV A. 2015. A New European Disunity: EU–Russia Ruptures and the Crisis in the Common Neighborhood. Problems of Post-Communism 62(6) pp. 313-315.

  • MARTINEZGARNELO Y CALVO G. 2014. The Eastern Partnership as an Expression of the European Neighborhood Policy: Reinforcing the European Normative Power with the Eastern Partners. Eastern Journal of European Studies 5(1) pp. 131-143.

  • MOLDER H. 2011. The Cooperative Security Dilemma in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of Baltic Studies 42(1) pp. 143-168.

  • MUIŽNIEKS N. 2011. Latvian-Russian Relations: Dynamics Since Latvia’s Accession to the EU and NATO. Riga: University of Latvia.

  • OJA K. 2015. No Milk for the Bear: the Impact on the Baltic States of Russia’s Counter-Sanctions. Baltic Journal of Economics 15(1) pp. 38-49.

  • OZOLIŅŠ J. VĒVERIS A. and BENGA E. 2015. The Role of EU Funds in Diversification of Rural Economy in Latvia. Research for Rural Development 2 pp. 154-160.

  • PAENKE J. 2015. The Fallout of the EU’s Normative Imperialism in the Eastern Neighborhood. Problems of Post-Communism 62(6) pp. 350.

  • PANKE D. 2010. Small States in the European Union: Coping with Structural Disadvantages. Farnham: Ashgate.

  • PARTSCHEFELD Y.B. 2015. A Complicated Three-Cornered Relationship: The Russophone Minority Between Estonian Home Country and Russian Mother Country. Russian Analytical Dialogue 176.

  • PASTORE G. 2013. Small New Member States in the EU Foreign Policy: Toward ‘Small State Smart Strategy’? Baltic Journal of Political Science (2) pp. 67-84.

  • PASZEWSKI T. 2016. Can Poland Defend Itself? Survival 58(2) pp. 117-134.

  • PIFER S. KULESA L. BAHR E. NEUNECK G. TROITSKIY M. and KROENIG M. 2015. Forum: NATO and Russia. Survival 57(2) pp. 119-144.

  • ROSTOKS T. 2012. Latvija – Vai Viegli Būt Mazam? In: Ž OZOLIŅA and T. ROSTOKS eds Latvijas Intereses Eiropas Savienībā. Riga Latvia: LatvijasPolitologu Biedrība pp. 33-45.

  • SHLAPENTOKH D. 2012. The Role of Small States in the Post-Cold War Era: The Case of Belarus. Carlisle PA: United States Army War College.

  • SIMONS G. 2015. Perceptions of Russia’s Soft Power and Influence in the Baltic States. Public Relations Review 41.

  • THE BALTIC TIMES 2016 10 July. Latvia to continue providing support to Afghanistan. The Baltic Times.

  • THORHALLSSON B. 2012. A Small State Seeking Shelter in Turbulent Times: Iceland’s Economic Crash and EU Membership Application. In: Ž OZOLIŅA and T. ROSTOKS eds Latvijas Intereses Eiropas Savieniba. Riga Latvia: Latvijas Politologu Biedrība pp. 54-63.

  • VILSON M. 2015. The Foreign Policy of the Baltic States and the Ukrainian Crisis: A Case of Europeanization? New Perspectives: Interdisciplinary Journal of Central & East European Politics & International Relations 23(2) pp. 49-76.

  • VITKUS G. 2015. Baltic States Foreign Policies vis-a-vis Russia in Light of the Ukraine Crisis. Russian Analytical Dialogue 176.

  • WHITMAN R.G. and JUNCOS A.E. 2013. Stasis in Status: Relations with the Wider Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 51 pp. 155-167.

  • WIVEL A. 2012. Optimizing Small State Interests in the European Union: Lessons from the Past Prospects for the Future. In: Ž OZOLIŅA and T. ROSTOKS eds Latvijas Intereses Eiropas Savieniba. Riga Latvia: Latvijas Politologu Biedrība pp. 46-53.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 527 263 14
PDF Downloads 380 184 10