“Pool it or lose it?” – a contrastive analysis of discourses concerning EU military integration and demilitarisation in the Baltic Sea

Open access

Abstract

This article illustrates that justification for EU military integration is sought with imperatives related to the economy, security, EU integration, and demands of citizens of the Member States. However, EU Treaties in terms of the improvement of military capabilities are not considered as a justification, but the European Union appears to be more of a power-enhancing realist actor rather than a normative one. As a counterexample to the European discourses, I discuss the case of the demilitarisation of the Åland Islands, in which case treaties perfectly justify demilitarization. I conclude that the development of European military integration is justified by political imperatives, but the demilitarization of the Åland Islands is supported with reference to agreements, which illustrate the differences in justifying military force and its absence. It is concluded that while the European Union appears as a realist actor in terms of defence, Finland complies with the image of a normative power as far as the Åland Islands are concerned.

References

  • Ashton, C., 2013. Final Report by the High Representative/Head of the EDA on the Common Security and Defence Policy. European Defence Agency (EDA) Annual Conference, (October), pp.1–27.

  • Bátora, J., 2009. European Defence Agency: A Flashpoint of Institutional Logics. West European Politics, 32(6), pp.1075–1098.

  • Beck, U., 2008. Reframing Power in the Globalized World. Organization Studies, 29(5), pp.793–804.

  • Biscop, S., 2012. The UK and European defence: Leading or leaving? International Affairs, 88(6), pp.1297–1313.

  • Biscop, S., 2016a. The EU Global Strategy: Realpolitik with European Characteristics. Security Policy Brief, 75 (June).

  • Biscop, S., 2016b. All or nothing? The EU Global Strategy and defence policy after the Brexit. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), pp.431–445.

  • Council of the European Union, 2010. Council conclusions on Military Capability Development.

  • Council of the European Union, 2016a. Council conclusions on implementing the EU Global Strategy in the area of Security and Defence.

  • Council of the European Union, 2016b. Implementation Plan on Security and Defence, (November), pp.1–31.

  • Deutsch, K.W. et al., 1957. Political community and the North Atlantic area : international organization in the light of historical experience, Princeton (N.J.): Princeton University Press.

  • Diez, T., Von Lucke, F. & Wellmann, Z., 2016. The Securitisation of Climate: Change Actors, Processes and Consequences, Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Dijkstra, H., 2012. The influence of EU officials in European Security and Defence. European Security, 21(3), pp.311–327.

  • Duke, S., 2012. The EU, NATO and the Treaty of Lisbon: Still Divided Within a Common City. In: P. J. Cardwell, ed. EU External Relations Law and Policy in the Post-Lisbon Era, The Hague: Springer Science+Business Media BV, pp. 334–355.

  • European Commission, 2013. Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector. COM(2013) 542 final.

  • European Commission, 2015a. In Defence of Europe. EPSC Strategic Notes, (4).

  • European Commission, 2015b. Roadmap: European Defence Action Plan.

  • European Commission, 2016. European Defence Action Plan. COM(2016) 950 final.

  • European Commission, 2017. White Paper on the Future of Europe.

  • European Defence Agency, 2012a. European Defence Matters 1.

  • European Defence Agency, 2012b. European Defence Matters 2.

  • European Defence Agency, 2014. European Defence Matters 6.

  • European Defence Agency, 2015a. European Defence Matters 7.

  • European Defence Agency, 2015b. European Defence Matters 8.

  • European Defence Agency, 2015c. European Defence Matters 9.

  • European Defence Agency, 2016. European Defence Matters 11.

  • European Parliament, 2016. Europeans in 2016: Perceptions and expectations, fight against terrorism and radicalisation. Special Eurobarometer of the European Parliament.

  • Finnish Parliament, 2016. Minutes of the plenary session on 20 Oct 2016.

  • Finnish Parliament Committee for Foreign Affairs, 2016. Committee Report on the Government’s Foreign and Security Policy Report 9/2016.

  • Fiott, D., 2015. The European Commission and the European Defence Agency: A Case of Rivalry? Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(3), pp.542–557.

  • France & Finland, 2016. Declaration on strengthening the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy.

  • Friis, K. & Rechborn-Kjennerud, E., 2016. From cyber threats to cyber risks. In: K. Friis & J. Ringsmose, eds. Conflict in Cyber Space: Theoretical, Strategic and Legal Perspectives. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge, pp. 27–44.

  • Haas, E.B., 1961. International Integration: The European and the Universal Process. International Organization, 15(3), pp.366–392.

  • Haas, E.B., 1968. The uniting of Europe : political, social, and economic forces 1950-1957, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

  • Hannikainen, L., 1994. The Continued Validity of the Dernilitarised and Neutralised Status of the Åland Islands. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 54(3), pp.614–651.

  • Hannikainen, L. & Lundstedt, T., 2016. Kansainvälisen oikeuden rooli nyky-Venäjän ulkopolitiikassa. Finnish Ministry of Defence.

  • Howorth, J., 2003. Why ESDP is Necessary and Beneficial for the Alliance. In: J. Howorth & J.T.S. Keeler (eds) Defending Europe: The EU, NATO, and the Quest for European Autonomy. Gordonsville, Virginia: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 219–238.

  • Jokela, J., 2014. Multi-speed Europe ? Differentiated integration in the external relations of the EU. FIIA Report 38.

  • Koivula, T., 2016. The European Union and the Use of Military Force: Uncovering the Myths, Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.

  • Manners, I., 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), pp.235–258.

  • Manners, I., 2006. Normative Power Europe Reconsidered: Beyond the Crossroads. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), pp.182–199.

  • Matlary, J.H., 2008. Much ado about little : the EU and human security. International Affairs, 84(1), pp.131–143.

  • Mauro, F. & Thoma, K., 2016. The Future of EU Defence Research.

  • Mogherini, F., 2016a. Opening Speech by High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the 2016 EDA Conference.

  • Mogherini, F., 2016b. Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union’s Foreign and Security Policy, Available at: https://eeas.europa.eu/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf.

  • Moravcsik, A., 1998. The Choice for Europe : Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.

  • Morozov, V., 2002. Human Rights and Foreign Policy Discourse in Today’s Russia: Romantic Realism and Securitisation of Identity. COPRI Working Papers (6/2002).

  • Müller, P., 2016. EU foreign policy: no major breakthrough despite multiple crises. Journal of European Integration, 38(3), pp.359–374.

  • Myntti, K., 2016. “Putin driver oss mot Nato”. Vasabladet 8 June 2016.

  • Niinistö, J., 2016a. Ahvenanmaan asia. Jussi Niinistö’s Blog.

  • Niinistö, J., 2016b. Gotlanti ja Ahvenanmaa. Jussi Niinistö’s Blog.

  • Norheim-Martinsen, P.M., 2013. The European Union and Military Force : Governance and Strategy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Peck, T, 2016. Britain will veto EU army, says Defence Secretary. The Independent 17 September 2016.

  • Poullie, Y., 2016. Åland’s Demilitarisation and Neutralisation at the End of the Cold War – Parliamentary Discussions in Åland and Finland 1988–1995. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 23(2), pp.179–210.

  • Prime Minister’s Office Finland, 2016. Finnish Foreign and Security Policy 2016 Government Report 6/2016.

  • Prime Minister’s Office Finland, 2017. Government’s Defence Report. Government Report 5/2017.

  • Rayroux, A., 2013. Speaking EU Defence at Home: Contentious Discourses and Constructive Ambiguity. Cooperation and Conflict, 49(3), pp.386–405.

  • Rettman, A., 2016a. Finland calls for “pragmatic” EU defence. EUobserver, 27 Sep 2016.

  • Rettman, A., 2016b. Germany: Trump victory to spur EU military union. EUobserver, pp.2–5.

  • Salonius-Pasternak, C., 2014. Tutkija Salonius-Pasternak: Suomi voisi olla sotilaallisen iskun ensimmäinen kohde. Helsingin Sanomat 29 Dec 2014.

  • Schroeder, U.C., 2011. The Organization of European Security Governance: Internal and External Security in Transition, Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge.

  • Tarkka, J., 2015. Ahvenanmaan asia. Etelä-Suomen Sanomat.

  • Tiilikainen, T., 2002. The Åland Islands, Finland and European security, Mariehamn: The Åland Islands Peace Institute.

  • Trybus, M., 2006. The new European Defence Agency: a contribution to the common European defence policy and a challenge to the community acquis? Common Market Law Review, 43(3), pp.667–703.

  • Weiss, T., 2011. The blurring border between the police and the military: A debate without foundations. Cooperation and Conflict, 46(3), pp.396–405.

  • Whitman, R.G., 2016. The UK and EU Foreign, Security and Defence Policy after Brexit: Integrated, Associated or Detached? National Institute Economic Review, (238), pp.43–50.

  • Wodak, R., 2001. The Discourse-Historical Approach. In: R. Wodak & M. Meyer, eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: SAGE Publications, pp.63–94.

  • Wodak, R., 2009. The discourse of politics in action: politics as usual, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Wodak, R. & Boukala, S., 2016. Talking about Solidarity and Security in the Age of Crisis: The Revival of Nationalism and Protectionism in the European Union - A Discourse-Historical Approach. In: C. Carta, J.-F. Morin, & M. Telo, eds. EU Foreign Policy through the Lens of Discourse Analysis: Making Sense of Diversity. Farnham, Surrey, GBR: Routledge.

  • Ykkösaamu, 2016. Jussi Niinistö. Ykkösaamu, 15 Oct.

  • Österdahl, I., 2009. The Neutral Ally: The European Security and Defence Policy and the Swedish Constitution. Nordic Journal of International Law, 78, pp.95–132.

Journal Information

A publication of the Baltic Defence College

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 30 30 25
PDF Downloads 10 10 9