This article addresses a key legal debate that the Baltic NATO members ought to engage in: what constitutes an “armed attack” and what interpretation should be made of this concept in order to deter recent Russian hybrid warfare strategies. These questions are considered in connection with a more general issue regarding the law of self-defence: the question of what constitutes an armed attack in international law. This article will try to present a broad definition and context of Russian hybrid warfare and how it is challenging traditional jus ad bellum paradigms. Too few policy-makers have paid detailed attention to the new Russian “lawfare” in Ukraine, using specific military and non-military tactics in order to blur the lines between “armed attack” and mere political intervention. Meanwhile, legal scholars detach their analysis from actual policy-serving considerations and tend to acquiesce to some very restrictive theories of the use force in self-defence. For some countries, like the Baltic ones, facing strategic exposure – because of both threatening neighbours and low military capacities – the jus ad bellum paradigm should not be construed as another layer of obstacle.
Allain, J. (2004). The True Challenge to the United Nations System of the Use of Force: The Failures of Kosovo and Iraq and the Emergence of the African Union. 8 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, pp. 237-242.
Bou Nader, P. (2016). Les interprétations extensives de l’article 51 de la Charte : De la légalité en droit international public des extensions temporelles et matérielles du droit de légitime défense. Germany. 200 pages.
Bowett, D. W. (1958). Self-Defense in International Law. Manchester. 294 pages.
Chainoglou, K. (2008). Reconceptualising the law of self-defence. Brussels. 488 pages.
De Bock, C. (2007). Israel, Eté 2006: « légitime défense disproportionnée » ou « représailles » ? Analyse d’un glissement de langage. Revue québécoise de droit international, p. 55.
Dinstein, Y. (2005). War, Aggression and Self-Defence. 4th ed. Cambridge. 349 pages. GERASIMOV, V. Tsennost Nauki v Predvidenniye, Voenno-promyshlenni Kurier, February 27th, 2013, http://www.vpk-news.ru/articles/14632
Green, J. (2009). The International Court of Justice and Self-Defence in International Law. Oregon. 229 pages.