The impact of personality and self-efficacy on academic and military performance: The mediating role of self-efficacy

Open access

Abstract

In order to optimize recruitment and the overall outcome of educational programmes, it is crucial to understand personal determinants of achievement. While several cognitive abilities and skills individually predict performance in academic and professional settings, it is less clear how personality translates into performance. This study addresses the impact of the Big Five personality trait, conscientiousness, on academic performance and instructor performance ratings and examines the mediating role of self-efficacy. Analysis of longitudinal data (Time 1: n = 166 (conscientiousness); Time 2: n = 161 (self-efficacy); Time 3: n = 136 (military performance) and n = 156 (academic performance)) from three military academies in Norway showed that conscientiousness was related to both military and academic performance. Moreover, self-efficacy emerged as a partial mediator for the relationship between conscientiousness and performance.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bandura A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.) Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4 pp. 71-78). New York: Academic Press.

  • Bandura A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

  • Bandura A. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory of Personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.) Handbook of Personality. Theory and Research (2 ed. pp. 154-196). New York The Guilford Press.

  • Bandura A. (2012). On the Functional Properties of Perceived Self-Efficacy Revisited. Journal of Management 38(9) 9-44.

  • Bandura A. & Locke E. A. (2003). Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(1) 87-99. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Baron R. M. & Kenny D. A. (1986). The Moderator - Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual Strategic and Statistical Considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6) 1173-1182.

  • Barrick M. R. & Mount M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: a meta-analysis. Personel psychology 44 1-26.

  • Barrick M. R. Mount M. K. & Judge T. A. (2001). Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go Next. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 9 (1/2) 9-30.

  • Brown S. D. Lent R. W. Telander K. & Tramayne S. (2011). Social cognitive career theory conscientiousness and work performance: A meta-analytic path analyses. Journal of Vocational Behavior 79 81-90. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Buch R. Säfvenbom R. & Boe O. (2015). The relationships between academic self-efficacy intrinsic motivation and perceived competence. Journal of Military Studies 6(1) 1-17.

  • Burns G. N. & Christiansen N. D. (2011). Self-efficacy in the Workplace: Linking personality to domain-specific efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 19 (4. December 2011).

  • Caprara Barbaranelli C. Borgogni L. & Perugini M. (1993). The "Big Five Questionnaire": a new questionnaire to assess the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences 15 281-288.

  • Caprara Vecchione M. Alessandri G. Gerbino M. & Barbaranelli G. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology 81 78-96. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Chappelle W. Novy P. L. Sowin T. W. & Thompson W. T. (2010). NEO PI-R Normative Personality Data That Distinguish U.S. Air Force Female Pilots. Military Psychology 22 158-175.

  • Cohen J. (1992). A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1) 155-159.

  • Congard A. Antoine P. & Gilles P.-Y. (2012). Assessing the strctural and Psychometric Properties of a New Personality Measure for Use With Military Personel in the French Armed Forces. Military Psychology 24 284-307. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Dinther M. v. Dochy F. & Segers M. (2011). Factors affecting students self-efficacy in higher education. Educational Research Review 6 95-108. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Engvik H. & Føllesdal H. (2005). The Big Five Inventory in Norwegian. Journal of the Norwegian Psychological Association 42 129-130.

  • Feyter T. D. Caers R. Vigna C. & Berings D. (2012). Unraveling the impact of Big Five personality traits on academic performance: The moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy and academic motivation. Learning and individual Differences 22 439-448. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Flora D. B. & Curran P. J. (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data Psychological Methods 9(4) 466-491.

  • Fritz M. S. & MacKinnon D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science 18 233-239.

  • Giunta L. D. Alessandri G. Gerbino M. Kanacri P. L. Zuffiano A. & Caprara G. V. (2013). The determinants of scholastic achievement: The contribution of personality traits self-esteem and academic self-efficacy. Learning and individual Differences 27 102-108. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hair J. F. Black W. C. Babin B. J. Anderson R. E. & Tatham R. L. (2005). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.

  • Horn P. S. V. Green K. E. & Martinussen M. (2009). Survey Response Rates and Survey Administration in Counseling and Clinical Psychology: A Meta-Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 69(3) 389-403. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hu L. & Bentler P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6(1) 1-55.

  • Hunter J. E. & Schmidt F. L. (2003). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings Beverly Hills CA: Sage.

  • Johansen R. B. Laberg J. C. & Martinussen M. (2013). Military Identity as Predictor of Perceived Military Competence and Skills Armed Forces & Society.

  • John O. P. & Srivastava S. (1999). The Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History Measurement and Theoretical Perspectives Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford press.

  • Judge T. A. & Ilies R. (2002). Relationship of Personality to Peformance Motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(4) 797-807. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Judge T. A. Ilies R. Bono J. E. & Gerhardt M. w. (2002). Personality and Leadership: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(4) 765-780. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Judge T. A. Jackson C. L. Shaw J. C. & Rich B. A. S. a. B. L. (2007). Self-Efficacy and Work-Related Performance: The Intregral Role of Individual Differences. Journal of Applied Psychology 92(1) 107-127. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Jöreskog K. G. (2005). Structural Equation Modeling with Ordinal Variables using LISREL. Technical documents. from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/ordinal.pdf

  • Kenny D. A. & McCoach D. B. (2003). Effect of the Number of Variables on Measures of Fit in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 10(3) 333-351. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Kuvaas B. Buch R. & Dysvik A. (2014). Performance Management: Perceiving Goals as Invariable and Implications for Perceived Job Autonomy and Work Performance. . Human Resource Management n/a(n/a). doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Martin J. H. Montgomery R. L. & Saphian D. (2006). Personality achievement test scores and high school percentile as predictors of academic performance across four years of coursework. Journal of Research in Personality 40 424-431.

  • Martocchio J. & Judge T. A. (1997). Relationship between conscientiousness and learning in employee training: Mediating influences on self-deception and self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology 82(764-773).

  • McCormack L. & Mellor D. (2002). The Role of Personality in Leadership: An application of the Fice-Factor Model in the Australian Military. Military Psychology 14(3) 179-197.

  • McCrae R. R. & Costa P. T. (1986). Personality stability and its implications for clinical psychology. ClinicalPsychology Review 6 407-423.

  • McCrae R. R. & Costa P. T. (1999). A Five-Factor Theory of Personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.) Handbook of Personality (2 ed.). New York: The Guilford press.

  • Mischel W. & Shoda Y. (1998). Reconciling prcessing dynamics and personality dispositions. Annual Review of Psychology 49 229-258.

  • Multon K. D. Brown S. D. & Lent R. W. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to aademic outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology 38 30-38.

  • Muthén B. O. du Toit S. H. C. & Spisic D. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Conditionallly accepted for publication in Psychometrika.

  • Pajares F. (1996). Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Academic Settings. Review of Educational Research 66(4) 543-578.

  • Podsakoff P. M. MacKenzie S. B. & Podsakoff N. P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5) 879-903. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Poropat A. E. (2009). A meta-Analysis of the Five-Factor Model of Personality and Academic Performance. Psychological Bulletin 135(2) 322-338. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Richardson M. Abraham C. & Bond R. (2012). Psychological Correlates of University Students´ Performance: A systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Psychological Bulletin 138(2) 353-387. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Robbins S. B. Lauver K. Le H. Davis D. Langley R. & Carlstrøm A. (2004). Do psycholsocial and study skils factors predict college outcomes? A meta analysis Psychological Bulletin 130 261-288. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Salgado J. F. (1998). Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance in Army and Civil Occupations: A European Perspective. Human Performance 11(2/3) 271-288.

  • Sellman W. S. Born D. H. Stricland W. J. & Ross J. J. (2010). Selection and Classification in the U.S. Military. In J. L. Farr & N. T. Tippins (Eds.) Employee Selection (pp. 679-699). New York Routledge.

  • Shamir E. (2011). Transforming Command. The Pursuit of Mission Command in the U.S British and Israeli Armies. Stanford California: Stanford University Press.

  • Stajkovic A. D. & Luthans F. (1998). Self-efficacy and Work-Related Performance: A Meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 124(2) 240-261.

  • Søgaard A. Selmer R. Bjertness E. & Thelle D. (2004). The Oslo health study: the impact of self selection in a large population-based survey. International Journal for equity in Health 2004(3:3) Retrieved Aug 7 2015 from http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/2013/2011/2013. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Tabak F. Nguyen N. Basuray T. & Darrow W. (2009). Exploring the impact of personality on performance: how time-on-task moderates the mediation by self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences 47 823-828. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Tett R. P. Jackson D. N. & Rothstein M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: a meta-analytic review. Personel psychology 1991(44) 703-742.

  • Viswesvaran C. (2001). Assessment of individual job performance: A review of the past century and a look ahead. In N. Anderson D. S. Ones H. K. Sinangil & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.) Handbook of industrial workd and organizational psychology: Vol. 1. Personnel psychology (pp. 110-126). London: Sage.

  • Whetten D. A. (1989). What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? The Academy of Management Review 14(4) 490-495. doi:

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Zhao X. Lynch J. G. & Chen Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 37 197-206.

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 572 404 32
PDF Downloads 316 245 14