Purpose: We propose and test a new leadership model. Our model is an extension of the leaderplex model which proposes that leader cognitive and social complexities are linked with leader effectiveness indirectly, in a mediation scheme, through behavioral complexity. We enhance the leader-plex model with a leader’s degree of managerial discretion as the moderator of the links in this mediation format.
Methodology: We test our model with a moderated mediation approach (Baron-Kenny four-step procedure and Preacher-Hayes bootstrapping methods).
Findings: We use results of interviews with top leaders in Poland and demonstrate that a leader’s managerial discretion is a moderator affecting the mediation scheme assumed in the leaderplex model.
Limitations: The sample size is only 29 leaders. To preserve the respondents’ anonymity, their opinions were evaluated by only one researcher who interviewed them directly. The results may be country specific (Poland).
Originality: We define new boundary conditions for the leaderplex model by showing importance of a leader’s real position (managerial discretion) in an organization. Specifically, we show that the nature of the relationships between the variables of interest will change when a leader operates in one physical environment (e.g., high managerial discretion) rather than another (e.g., low managerial discretion).
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Ahearn K.K. Ferris G.R. Hochwarter W.A. Douglas C. and Ammeter A.P. (2004). Leader political skill and team performance. Journal of Management30(3) 309–327 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2003.01.004
Aiken L.S. West S.G. and Reno R.R. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park: Sage Publications https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50(2) 179–211 https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Alban-Metcalfe J. and Alimo-Metcalfe B. (2013). Reliability and validity of the “leadership competencies and engaging leadership scale”. International Journal of Public Sector Management26(1) 56–73 https://doi.org/10.1108/09513551311294281
Ammeter A.P. Douglas C. Gardner W.L. Hochwarter W.A. and Ferris G.R. (2002). Toward a political theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly13(6) 751–796 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00157-1
Antonakis J. Bendahan S. Jacquart P. and Lalive R. (2010). On making causal claims: A review and recommendations. The Leadership Quarterly21(6) 1086–1120 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
Barker III V. L. Patterson Jr P. W. and Mueller G. C. (2001). Organizational causes and strategic consequences of the extent of top management team replacement during turnaround attempts. Journal of Management Studies 38(2) 235–269 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00235
Baron R.M. and Kenny D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual strategic and statistic al considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 1173–1182 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-35184.108.40.2063
Bass B.M. (1985). Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass B.M. and Avolio B.J. (2000). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Manual Leader Form Rater and Scoring Key for MLQ. Redwood City CA: Mind Garden.
Belasen A. and Frank N. (2008). Competing values leadership: Quadrant roles and personality traits. Leadership and Organization Development Journal29(2) 127–143 https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730810852489
Boal K.B. and Hooijberg R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly11(4) 515–549 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00057-6
Bruch H. and Walter F. (2007). Leadership in context: Investigating hierarchical impacts on transformational leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal28(8) 710–726 https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710835452
Carmeli A. and Halevi M.Y. (2009). How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambi-dexterity. The Leadership Quarterly20(2) 207–218 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.011
Clark J.R. Murphy C. and Singer S.J. (2014). When do leaders matter? Ownership governance and the influence of CEOs on firm performance. The Leadership Quarterly25(2) 358–372 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.09.004
Crant M.J. (2000). Proactive Behavior in Organizations. Journal of Management 26(3) 435–462 https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304
Denison D.R. Hooijberg R. and Quinn R.E. (1995). Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science6(5) 524–540 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.5.524
Dionne S.D. et al. (2014). A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly25(1) 6–35 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002
Espedal B. (2009). Maneuvering space for leadership. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies16(2) 197–212 https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809334190
Federici R.A. (2013). Principals’ self-efficacy: Relations with job autonomy job satisfaction and contextual constraints. European Journal of Psychology of Education28(1) 73–86 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0102-5
Fischer T. Dietz J. and Antonakis J. (2017). Leadership process models: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management43(6) 1726–1753 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316682830
Fishbein M. and Ajzen I. (1975). Belief attitude intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hambrick D.C. and Finkelstein S. (1987). Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views on organizations. In: L. Cummings and M. Staw (eds.) Research in organizational behavior vol. 9: 369–406. Greenwich.
Hart S.L. and Quinn R.E. (1993). Roles Executives Play: CEOs Behavioral Complexity and Firm Performance. Human Relations 46(5) 543–574 https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600501
Hayes A.F. (2015). An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research50(1) 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
Hayes A.F. (2018). Partial conditional and moderated moderated mediation: Quantification inference and interpretation. Communication Monographs85(1) 4–40 https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1352100
Hayes A.F. and Rockwood N.J. (2017). Regression-based statistical mediation and moderation analysis in clinical research: Observations recommendations and implementation. Behaviour Research and Therapy98 39–57 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.11.001
Heyler S.G. Armenakis A.A. Walker A.G. and Collier D.Y. (2016). A qualitative study investigating the ethical decision making process: A proposed model. The Leadership Quarterly27(5) 788–801 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.003
Hoogh de A.H. et al. (2004). Charismatic leadership environmental dynamism and performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 13(4) 447–471 https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320444000164
Hooijberg R. (1996). A multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations49(7) 917–946 https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679604900703
Hooijberg R. Hunt J.G. and Dodge G.E. (1997). Leadership complexity and development of the leaderplex model. Journal of Management23(3) 375–408 https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639702300305
Hooijberg R. and Quinn R.E. (1992). Behavioral complexity and the development of effective managers. In: R.L. Phillips and J.G. Hunt (eds.) Strategic management: A multiorganizational-level perspective. New York: Quorum.
Howell J.P. Dorfman P.W. and Kerr S. (1986). Moderator variables in leadership research. Academy of Management Review11(1) 88–102 https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4282632
Jacques E. (1986). The Development of Intellectual Capability: A Discussion of Stratified Systems Theory. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science22(4) 361–383 https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638602200402
Johns G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review31(2) 386–408 https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.20208687
Jung D. I. Chow C. and Wu A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership Quarterly14 525–544 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00050-X
Kellerman B. (2012). The end of leadership. New York: Harper-Collins.
Kozminski A.K. (2015). Bounded Leadership: Empirical Study of Polish Elite. Polish Sociological Review 4(192) 425–453.
Kyndt E. and Baert H. (2015). Entrepreneurial competencies: Assessment and predictive value for entrepreneurship. Journal of Vocational Behavior90 13–25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2015.07.002
Lawrence K.A. Lenk P. and Quinn R.E. (2009). Behavioral complexity in leadership: The psycho-metric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. The Leadership Quarterly20(2) 87–102 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.01.014
Leavitt H.J. (2003). Why hierarchies thrive. Harvard Business Review81(3) 96–102.
Litano M.L. Major D.A. Landers R.N. Streets V.N. and Bass B.I. (2016). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between leader-member exchange and work-family experiences. The Leadership Quarterly27(5) 802–817 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.06.003
Lussier D.N. (2010). From solidarity to division: An analysis of Lech Wałęsa’s transition to constituted leadership. The Leadership Quarterly21(5) 703–715 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.002
Miller D. (2002). Successful change leaders: what makes them? What do they do that is different? Journal of Change Management2(4) 359–368 https://doi.org/10.1080/714042515
Mintzberg H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Neubert M.J. Hunter E.M. and Tolentino R.C. (2016). A servant leader and their stakeholders: When does organizational structure enhance a leader’s influence? The Leadership Quarterly27(6) 896–910 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.005
Ng K. Y. Ang S. and Chan K. Y. (2008). Personality and leader effectiveness: a moderated mediation model of leadership self-efficacy job demands and job autonomy. Journal of Applied Psychology93(4) 733–743 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.733
Oc B. (2018). Contextual leadership: A systematic review of how contextual factors shape leadership and its outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly29(1) 218–235 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.004
Osborn R.N. Hunt J.G. and Jauch L.R. (2002). Toward a contextual theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly13(6) 797–837 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00154-6
Parker S.K. and Collins C.G. (2010). Taking Stock: Integrating and Differentiating Multiple Proactive Behaviors. Journal of Management 36(3) 633–662 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
Pereira C.M. and Gomes J.F. (2012). The strength of human resource practices and transformational leadership: impact on organisational performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management23(20) 4301–4318 https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.667434
Podsakoff P.M. MacKenzie S.B. Lee J.Y. and Podsakoff N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5) 879–903 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Porter L.W. and McLaughlin G.B. (2006). Leadership and the organizational context: like the weather? The Leadership Quarterly17(6) 559–576 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.002
Pounder J.S. (1999). Organizational effectiveness in higher education: managerial implications of a Hong Kong study. Educational Management and Administration 27(4) 389–400 https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X990274006
Preacher K.J. and Hayes A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers36(4) 717–731 https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
Preacher K.J. and Hayes A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40 879–891 https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Preacher K.J. Rucker D.D. and Hayes A.F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research42(1) 185–227 https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
Quinn R.E. (1984). Applying the Competing Values Approach to Leadership: Toward an Integrative Model. In: J.G. Hunt R. Stewart C. Schriesheim and D. Hosking (eds.) Managers and Leaders: An International Perspective. New York: Pergamon https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-030943-9.50010-3
Quinn R.E. (1988). Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.
Quinn R.E. and Rohrbaugh J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis Management Science 29(3) 363–377 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363
Salancik G. and Pfeffer J. (1977). Constraints on administrator discretion: The limited influence of mayors on city budgets. Urban Affairs Quarterly 12 475–498 https://doi.org/10.1177/107808747701200405
Schilling J. (2009). From ineffectiveness to destruction: A qualitative study on the meaning of negative leadership. Leadership5(1) 102–128 https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008098312
Simon H.A. (1957). A behavioral model of rational choice in: Models of Man: Social and Rational. Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in a Social Setting. New York: Wiley.
Spangenberg H.H. and Theron C.C. (2001). Manual for the Leadership Behaviour Inventory: Guidelines for Administration Scoring and Interpretation. Stellenbosch: University of Stellenbosch.
Stentz J.E. Clark V.L. and Matkin G.S. (2012). Applying mixed methods to leadership research: A review of current practices. The Leadership Quarterly23(6) 1173–1183 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.001
Strang S.E. and Kuhnert K.W. (2009). Personality and leadership developmental levels as predictors of leader performance. The Leadership Quarterly20(3) 421–433 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.009
Sturm R.E. Vera D. and Crossan M. (2017). The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance. The Leadership Quarterly28(3) 349–366 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.11.007
Tepper B.J. (2000). Consequences of Abusive Supervision. Academy of Management Journal 43 178–190 https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375
Waldman D.A. Ramirez G.G. House R.J. and Puranam P. (2001). Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability under conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal44(1) 134–143 https://doi.org/10.5465/3069341
Wang P. and Rode J.C. (2010). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The moderating effects of identification with leader and organizational climate. Human Relations63(8) 1105–1128 https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709354132
Wangrow D.B. Schepker D.J. and Barker III V.L. (2015). Managerial discretion: An empirical review and focus on future research directions. Journal of Management 41(1) 99–135 https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314554214
Yang L.R. Yen H.F. and Chiang Y.F. (2012). A framework for assessing impacts of leadership competency on police project performance: Mediating role of job satisfaction and moderating role of project type. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management35(3) 528–550 https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511211250785
Yukl G. (1989). Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research. Journal of Management 15(2) 251–289 https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500207
Zaccaro S.J. Green J.P. Dubrow S. and Kolze M.J. (2018). Leader individual differences situational parameters and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly29 2–43 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.10.003