Inequality in Economics: The Concept, Perception, Types, and Driving Forces

Open access


Purpose: The aim of the paper is to overview the research on inequalities in economics. The paper is based on mainstream and heterodox economic theories and approaches addressing inequality and its economic interdependence.

Methodology: Due to its positive and normative nature, inequality is a complex concept that eludes precise definition. The available application of mainstream and heterodox approach to study inequality and its economic interdependence allows for the identification of various components of inequality. Classifications that fall within the mainstream economics especially reveal less numerous and often even different types of inequalities compared to heterodox approaches. Moreover, what determines within-country inequality is the number of driving forces related to the factual and regulatory sphere of an economy.

Findings: This study does not exhaust the general debate over inequality in economics. The question remains about the state of research dedicated to the outcomes of inequality, for instance, perceived in its dynamic and historical perspective. Moreover, there emerges a need to overview the theoretical and empirical research dedicated to inequality in terms of not only its driving forces but also economic outcomes.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Acemoglu D. (2002). Technical change inequality and the labor market. J. Econ. Lit.40: 7–72.

  • Adams J. and Richard H. (2002). Nonfarm Income Inequality and Land in Rural Egypt. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change50: 339–363

  • Adams R.H.J. (2001). Nonfarm Income Inequality and Poverty in Rural Egypt and Jordan Policy Research Working Papers. The World Bank

  • Ahluwalia M.S. (1976). Inequality poverty and development. J. Dev. Econ. 3: 307–342

  • Akerlof G.A. and Yellen J.L. (1985). Can Small Deviations from Rationality Make Significant Differences to Economic Equilibria? Am. Econ. Rev. 75: 708–720.

  • Alesina A. and Rodrik D. (1994). Distributive Politics and Economic Growth. Q. J. Econ109: 465–490

  • Anand S. and Kanbur S.M.R. (1993). Inequality and development A critique. J. Dev. Econ.41: 19–43

  • Arneson R.J. (1989). Equality And Equal-Oportunity for Welfare. Philos. Stud.56: 77–93.

  • Arrow K.J. Bowles S. and Durlauf S.N. (eds.) (2000). Meritocracy and economic inequality. Princeton University Press Princeton.

  • Assa J. (2012). Financialization and its consequences: The OECD experience. Finance Res. 1: 35–39.

  • Atkinson A.B. (1997). Bringing Income Distribution in From the Cold. Econ. J.107: 297–321.

  • Auten G. and Carroll R. (1999). The Effect of Income Taxes on Household Income. Rev. Econ. Stat.81: 681–693

  • Baker J. Lynch K. Cantillion S. and Walsh J. (2009). Equality. From Theory to Action. Palgrave Macmillan London.

  • Barro R.J. (2000). Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries. J. Econ. Growth5: 5–32

  • Barro R.J. (1999). Inequality Growth and Investment (No. w7038). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  • Becker G.S. (1981). A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  • Bell D. (1972). On Meritocracy and equality. Public Interest29: 29–68.

  • Bergson A. (1938). A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics. Q. J. Econ.52 310–334

  • Birchenall J.A. (2001). Income distribution human capital and economic growth in Colombia. J. Dev. Econ.66: 271–287

  • Bishop J.A. Formby J.P. and Smith W.J. (1991). Lorenz Dominance and Welfare: Changes in the U.S. Distribution of Income 1967–1986. Rev. Econ. Stat.73: 134–139

  • Blackburn M.L. and Bloom D.E. (1987). Earnings and Income Inequality in the United States. Popul. Dev. Rev.13: 575–609

  • Blackburn R.M. (2008). What is social inequality? Int. J. Sociol. Soc. Policy28: 250–259

  • Blau F.D. and Kahn L.M. (1996). International Differences in Male Wage Inequality: Institutions versus Market Forces. J. Polit. Econ.104: 791–837

  • Blejer M.I. and Guerrero I. (1990). The Impact of Macroeconomic Policies on Income Distribution: An Empirical Study of the Philippines. Rev. Econ. Stat.72: 414–423

  • Blinder A.S. (1973). Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates. J. Hum. Resour.8: 436–455

  • Bourguignon F. Ferreira F.H.G. and Leite P.G. (2008). Beyond Oaxaca–Blinder: Accounting for differences in household income distributions. J. Econ. Inequal.6: 117–148

  • Bourguignon F. Ferreira F.H.G. and Walton M. (2007). Equity efficiency and inequality traps: A research agenda. J. Econ. Inequal.5: 235–256

  • Bourguignon F. and Morrisson C. (1998). Inequality and development: the role of dualism. J. Dev. Econ.57: 233–257

  • Brouwer W.B.F. Culyer A.J. van Exel N.J.A. and Rutten F.F.H. (2008). Welfarism vs. extra-welfarism. J. Health Econ.27: 325–338

  • Brunori P. Ferreira F.H.G. and Peragine V. (2013). Inequality of Opportunity Income Inequality and Economic Mobility: Some International Comparisons. In: E. Paus (ed.) Getting Development Right: Structural Transformation Inclusion and Sustainability in the Post-Crisis Era. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US

  • Budría S. and Pereira P.T. (2005). Educational Qualifications and Wage Inequality: Evidence for Europe. IZA Discuss. Pap. No. 1763.

  • Burchardt T. (2006). Foundations for Measuring Equality: A discussion paper for the Equalities Review. London: London School of Economics.

  • Burtless G. (1995). International Trade and the Rise in Earnings Inequality. J. Econ. Lit. 33: 800–816.

  • Cameron J. (2000). Amartya Sen on economic inequality: the need for an explicit critique of opulence. J. Int. Dev. 12: 1031–1045<1031::AID-JID725>3.0.CO;2-9

  • Cameron J. and Ndhlovu T.P. (2000). Development Economics: An Institutional Bastion. J. Interdiscip. Econ.11: 237–253

  • Cappelen A.W. Sørensen E.Ø. and Tungodden B. (2010). Responsibility for what? Fairness and individual responsibility. Eur. Econ. Rev. 54: 429–441

  • Carter P.L. and Reardon S.F. (2014). Inequality matters. William T. Grant Foundation Paper. William T. Grant Foundation New York.

  • Champernowne D.G. and Cowell F.A. (1998). Economic inequality and income distribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Charness G. and Rabin M. (2002). Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests*. Q. J. Econ.117: 817–869

  • Chryssides G.D. and Kaler J.H. (1993). An introduction to business ethics. London: Chapman & Hall.

  • Cohen G.A. (2001). If You’re an Egalitarian How Come You’re So Rich? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Cohen G.A. (1989). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics99: 906–944

  • Cowell F.A. (2007). Income distribution and inequality (No. DARP 94). London: London School of Economics.

  • Cowell F.A. and Fiorio C.V. (2011). Inequality decompositions – a reconciliation. J. Econ. Inequal.9: 509–528

  • Datt G. and Ravallion M. (1992). Growth and redistribution components of changes in poverty measures: A decomposition with applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s. J. Dev. Econ.38: 275–295

  • Ding S. Meriluoto L. Reed W.R. Tao D. and Wu H. (2011). The impact of agricultural technology adoption on income inequality in rural China: Evidence from southern Yunnan Province. China Econ. Rev. 22: 344–356

  • Dollar D. and Kraay A. (2002). Growth is Good for the Poor. J. Econ. Growth7: 195–225

  • Dworkin R. (2000). Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

  • Dworkin R. (1981a). What is equality. Part 1: Equality of Welfare. Philos. Public Aff.10: 185–246.

  • Dworkin R. (1981b). What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources. Philos. Public Aff.10: 283–345. Easterly W. (2007). Inequality does cause underdevelopment: Insights from a new instrument. J. Dev. Econ.84: 755–776

  • Easterly W. (1999). Life During Growth. J. Econ. Growth4: 239–276

  • Eckwert B. and Zilcha I. (2007). The Effect of Better Information on Income Inequality. Econ. Theory32: 287–307

  • Elbers C. and Lanjouw P. (2001). Intersectoral Transfer Growth and Inequality in Rural Ecuador. Rural Nonfarm Employ. Incomes Lat. Am.29: 481–496

  • El-Osta H.S. Bernat G.A. and Ahearn M.C. (1995). Regional Differences in the Contribution of Off-Farm Work to Income Inequality. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev.24: 1–14

  • Feenberg D.R. and Poterba J.M. (2000). The Income and Tax Share of Very High-Income Households 1960-1995. Am. Econ. Rev.90: 264–270

  • Fehr E. and Fischbacher U. (2002). Why Social Preferences Matter – The Impact Of Non-Selfish Motives On Competition Cooperatives and Incentives. Econ. J.112: C1–C33

  • Fehr E. and Gachter S. (2000). Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 90: 980–994

  • Fehr E. and Schmidt K.M. (1999). A Theory of Fairness Competition and Cooperation*. Q. J. Econ.114: 817–868

  • Fernández R. Guner N. and Knowles J. (2005). Love and money: A theoretical and empirical analysis of household sorting and inequality. Q. J. Econ.120: 273–344

  • Ferreira F.H. and Walton M. (2005). World development report 2006: equity and development. World Bank Publications. Washington DC.

  • Fields G.S. (2003). Accounting for income inequality and its change: a new method with application to the distribution of earnings in the united states. In: S.W. Polachek (ed.) Worker Well-Being and Public Policy Research in Labor Economics. Emerald Group Publishing Limited

  • Filek J. Kot D. Sosenko K. and Węgrzecki A. (2004). Nierówności. In: S.M. Kot Malawski and A. Węgrzecki (eds.) Dobrobyt społeczny nierówności i sprawiedliwość dystrybutywna. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej.

  • Firpo S. Fortin N.M. and Lemieux T. (2009). Unconditional Quantile Regressions. Econometrica77: 953–973

  • Fitoussi J.-P. and Rosanvallon P. (1996). Le nouvel âge des inégalités. Paris: Seuil.

  • Fournier J.-M. and Koske I. (2012). The determinants of earnings inequality. OECD J. Econ. Stud. 2012/1

  • Goldin C. and Katz L.F. (1996). Technology Skill and the Wage Structure: Insights from the Past. Am. Econ. Rev.86: 252–257.

  • Gottschalk P. and Smeeding T.M. (2000). Chapter 5 Empirical evidence on income inequality in industrialized countries. In: Handbook of Income Distribution. Elsevier

  • Jaumotte F. Lall S. and Papageorgiou C. (2013). Rising Income Inequality: Technology or Trade and Financial Globalization? IMF Econ. Rev.61: 271–309

  • Jenkin S. (2011). The Economic Debate on Inequality: Past Present and Future. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci.2: 46–56.

  • Jenkins S.P. (1995). Accounting for Inequality Trends: Decomposition Analyses for the UK 1971–86. Economica62: 29–63.

  • Juhn C. Murphy K.M. and Pierce B. (1993). Wage Inequality and the Rise in Returns to Skill. J. Polit. Econ.101: 410–442

  • Kanbur R. and Lustig N. (1999). Why is inequality back on the Agenda? Artigo apresentado na. In: Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics Banco Mundial Washington DC April.

  • Koenker R. and Bassett G. (1978). Regression Quantiles. Econometrica46: 33–50

  • Kolodko G.W. (2011). Truth Errors and Lies. Politics and Economics in a Volatile World. New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Kopczuk W. and Lupton J.P. (2007). To Leave or Not to Leave: The Distribution of Bequest Motives. Rev. Econ. Stud.74: 207–235.

  • Kot S.M. (2004a). Nierówności ekonomiczne i społeczne a zasady sprawiedliwości dystrybutywnej. Nierówności Społeczne a Wzrost Gospod.4: 45–55.

  • Kot S.M. (2004b). Dobrobyt. In: S.M. Kot A. Malawski and A. Węgrzecki (eds.) Dobrobyt społeczny nierówności i sprawiedliwość dystrybutywna. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej.

  • Krueger A.B. (1993). How Computers Have Changed the Wage Structure: Evidence from Microdata 1984–1989*. Q. J. Econ.108: 33–60

  • Krugman P. and Venables A.J. (1995). Globalization and the Inequality of Nations*. Q. J. Econ.110: 857–880.

  • Kus B. (2012). Financialisation and Income Inequality in OECD Nations: 1995-2007. Econ. Soc. Rev.43: 477–495.

  • Kuznets S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. Am. Econ. Rev.45: 1–28.

  • Landreth H. and Colander D.C. (1994). History of economic thought 3rd ed. ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

  • Leones J.P. and Feldman S. (1998). Nonfarm Activity and Rural Household Income: Evidence from Philippine Microdata. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change46: 789–806

  • Li H. Squire L. and Zou H. (2001). Explaining International and Intertemporal Variations in Income Inequality. Econ. J.108: 26–43

  • Li H. Xu L.C. and Zou H. (2003). Corruption Income Distribution and Growth. Econ. Polit.12: 155–182.

  • Little I.M.D. (2002). Ethics economics and politics: Principles of public policy. New York: Oxford University Press on Demand.

  • Liu H. and Lu J. (2006). Measuring the degree of assortative mating. Econ. Lett.92: 317–322

  • Matthews K.A. and Gallo L.C. (2010). Psychological Perspectives on Pathways Linking Socioeconomic Status and Physical Health. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62: 501–530

  • Mocan H.N. (1999). Structural Unemployment Cyclical Unemployment and Income Inequality. Rev. Econ. Stat.81: 122–134

  • Morduch J. and Sicular T. (2002). Rethinking Inequality Decomposition With evidence From Rural China. Econ. J.112: 93–106

  • Moss D.A. Thaker A. and Rudnick H. (2013). Inequality and Decision Making: Imagining a New Line of Inquiry

  • Murphy K.M. and Welch F. (1992). The Structure of Wages*. Q. J. Econ.107: 285–326

  • Nozick R. (1974). Anarchy Utopia and the state. New York: Basic Books Inc.

  • Oaxaca R. (1973). Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets. Int. Econ. Rev.14: 693–709

  • Okatch Z. Siddique A. and Rammohan A. (2013). Determinants of income inequality in Botswana Discussion paper/the University of Western Australia Economics. Business School – Economics University of Western Australia Crawley WA.

  • Polanyi K. (1944). The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Times. Boston: Beacon Press.

  • Prieto-Rodriguez J. Barros C.P. and Vieira J.A.C (2008). What a quantile approach can tell us about returns to education in Europe. Educ. Econ.16: 391–410

  • Rattsø J. and Stokke H. (2014). Regional Convergence of Income and Education: Investigation of Distribution Dynamics. Urban Stud.51: 1672–1685

  • Ravallion M. and Chen S. (1997). What Can New Survey Data Tell Us about Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty? World Bank Econ. Rev.11: 357–382

  • Rawls J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Richardson J.D. (1995). Income Inequality and Trade: How to Think What to Conclude. J. Econ. Perspect.9: 33–55

  • Roemer J.E. (2012). On Several Approaches To Equality of Opportunity. Econ. Philos.28: 165–200

  • Roemer J.E. (2006). Review essay “The 2006 world development report: Equity and development.” J. Econ. Inequal.4: 233–244

  • Roemer J.E. (1998). Equality of opportunity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Roemer J.E. (1993). A Pragmatic Theory of Responsibility for the Egalitarian Planner. Philos. Public Aff.22: 146–166.

  • Rosenbaum E.F. (1999). Against naive materialism: culture consumption and the causes of inequality. Camb. J. Econ.23: 317–336

  • Ryu H.K. and Slottje D.J. (1998). Measuring Trends in U.S. Income Inequality Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin Heidelberg

  • Samuelson P.A. (1948). Foundations of Economic Analysis. Sci. Soc.13: 93–95.

  • Schneider S.M. (2012). Income Inequality and its Consequences for Life Satisfaction: What Role do Social Cognitions Play? Soc. Indic. Res.106: 419–438

  • Sen A. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Sen A. (1979). Personal Utilities and Public Judgements: Or What’s Wrong With Welfare Economics. Econ. J.89: 537–558

  • Sen A. (1977). Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination. Econometrica45: 53–89

  • Sen A. (1973). On Economic Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Sen A. Sen M.A. Amartya S. Foster J.E. and Foster J.E. (1997). On economic inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Sennett R. (2003). Respect in a World of Inequality. WW Norton & Company.

  • Sequeira T.N. Santos M. and Ferreira-Lopes A. (2017). Income Inequality TFP and Human Capital. Econ. Rec.93: 89–111

  • Shorrocks A.F. (1984). Inequality Decomposition by Population Subgroups. Econometrica52: 1369–1385.

  • Shorrocks A.F. (1980). The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures. Econometrica48: 613–625

  • Simpson B.P. (2009). Wealth and Income Inequality: An Economic and Ethical Analysis. J. Bus. Ethics89: 525

  • Slottje D.J. Hayes K.J. and Shackett J. (1992). Labour Force Participation Race And Human Capital: Influence On Earnings Distributions Across States. Rev. Income Wealth38: 27–37

  • Slottje D.J. and Raj B. (1998). Income Inequality and Poverty Empirics: New Tools and Perspectives. In: D.J. Slottje and B. Raj (eds.) Income Inequality Poverty and Economic Welfare. Physica-Verlag HD.

  • Sosenko K. (2012). Etyka ekonomii. In: W. Gasparski (ed.) Biznes Etyka Odpowiedzialność. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

  • Tversky A. and Kahneman D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain.5: 297–323

  • Voitchovsky S. (2005). Does the Profile of Income Inequality Matter for Economic Growth? J. Econ. Growth10: 273–296

  • Wan G. and Zhou Z. (2005). Income Inequality in Rural China: Regression-based Decomposition Using Household Data. Rev. Dev. Econ.9: 107–120

  • Zwarthoed D. (2009). Comprendre la pauvreté. John Rawls-Amartya Sen. Paris: PUF.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 111 111 4
PDF Downloads 113 113 2