How do we study crowdfunding? An overview of methods and introduction to new research agenda

Open access


Purpose: Crowdfunding is a global phenomenon of rising significance and impact on different areas of business and social life, investigated across many academic disciplines. The goal of the article is to present the variety of methods applied in crowdfunding research, assess their strengths and weaknesses, offer the typology of methodological approaches, and suggest the most promising direction for further studies.

Design/methodology: The paper is based on the review of the most recent academic and industry literature on crowdfunding and own analysis of data presented by crowdfunding platforms’ operators.

Findings: The article incorporates interrelations of methods, goals of inquiries, and types of results propose a typology of methodological approaches that researchers currently apply to crowdfunding: from platform-centred to multi-sited. The authors discuss the advantages and limitations of the identified approaches with the use of multiple examples of recent and most influential studies from the field and propose the most urgent direction of future inquiries.

Research limitations/implications: The overview renders crowdfunding studies more accessible for potential newcomers to the field and strengthens transdisciplinary discussion on crowdfunding. Despite the broad variety of the analyzed articles that reflect the newest trends, the sample is not representative in the statistical meanings of the term.

Originality/value: The article offers the first review of methodologies applied in the transdisciplinary area of crowdfunding studies and connects it to broader methodological discussions about transdisciplinary research on the digital phenomena. The review strengthens the transdisciplinary dialog on crowdfunding.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Agrawal A. Catalini C. and Goldfarb A. (2011). Friends Family and the Flat World: The Geography of Crowdfunding. NET Institute Working Paper No. 10-08 No. 16820: 1–70

  • Agrawal A. Catalini C. and Goldfarb A. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography Social Networks and the Timing of Investment Decisions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy24(2): 253–274

  • Ahlers G.K.C. Cumming D. Guenther C. and Schweizer D. (2015). Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice39(4): 955–980

  • BBVA Research Department (2015). Crowdfunding in 360º: alternative financing for the digital era. BBVA Research Department. Obtained from: (26.04.2017).

  • Bayus B.L. (2013). Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community. UNC Kenan-Flagler Research Paper No. 2012-5. Obtained from: (08.07.2017).

  • Belleflamme P. Lambert T. and Schwienbacher A. (2014). Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. Journal of Business Venturing29(5): 585–609

  • Bradford C. (2012). Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Laws. Columbia Business Law Review1: 1–150

  • Brown N. and Michael M. (2003). A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management15(1): 3–18

  • Bruton G. Khavul S. Siegel D. and Wright M. (2015). New financial alternatives in seeding entrepreneurship: Microfinance crowdfunding and peer-to-peer innovations. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice39(1): 9–26

  • Calic G. and Mosakowski E. (2016). Kicking Off Social Entrepreneurship: How A Sustainability Orientation Influences Crowdfunding Success. Journal of Management Studies 53(5): 738–767

  • Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2016). Breaking New Ground: The Americas Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance Obtained from

  • Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance (2017). The Americas Alternative Finance Industry Report: Hitting Stride. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. Obtained from

  • Chen S. Thomas S. and Kohli C. (2016). What really makes a promotional campaign succeed on a crowdfunding platform? Journal of Advertising Research56(1): 81–94

  • Chen X. Yao X. and Kotha S. (2009). Entrepreneur Passion And Preparedness In Business Plan Presentations: A Persuasion Analysis Of Venture Capitalists’ Funding Decisions. Academy of Management Journal52(1): 199–214

  • Cordova A. Dolci J. and Gianfrate G. (2015). The determinants of crowdfunding success: evidence from technology projects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences181: 115–124

  • (2017). Crowdfunding Industry Statistics 2015 2016. Obtained from: (26.04.2017).

  • Crowdfunding in Europe. Introduction and state of play (2017). European Union: European Parliamentary Research Service. Obtained from: (06.06.2017).

  • CrowdFunding Playbook (2017). Crowdfunding Data Intelligence. Analyse investments and past campaigns. Obtained from: (26.04.2017).

  • and Massolution (2017). Available Research. Obtained from: (14.06.2017).

  • Dapp T. (2014). Fintech – The digital (r)evolution in the financial sector. Obtained from: (14.06.2017).

  • Dushnitsky G. Guerini M. Piva E. and Rossi-Lamastra C. (2016). Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform Creation across Countries. California Management Review 58(2): 44–71.

  • European Commission (2016). Commission staff working document – Report on Crowdfunding in the EU Capital Markets Union. Brussels: European Commission. Obtained from: (05.02.2017).

  • Fleming L. and Sorenson O. (2016). Financing by and for the Masses: an introduction to the special issue on crowdfunding. California Management Review 58(2): 5–19.

  • Felin T. Lakhani K.R. and Tushman M. (2014). Special issue of Strategic Organization: “Organizing Crowds and Innovation”. Strategic Organization 12(3): 220–221

  • Frydrych D. Bock A. J. Kinder T. and Koeck B. (2014). Exploring entrepreneurial legitimacy in reward-based crowdfunding. Venture Capital16(3): 247–269

  • Galuszka P. and Bystrov V. (2014). Crowdfunding: A Case Study of a New Model of Financing Music Production. Journal of Internet Commerce 13(3–4): 233–252

  • Geels F.W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy 33(6–7): 897–920

  • Gillespier T. (2010). The Politics of ‘Platform’. New Media & Society12(3): 347–364.

  • Gleasure R. and Feller J. (2016). Emerging technologies and the democratisation of financial services: A metatriangulation of crowdfunding research. Information and Organization26(4): 101–115

  • Goldman R. and Gabriel R.P. (2005). Chapter 2 – Innovation Happens Elsewhere. In Innovation Happens Elsewhere. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann

  • Golić Z. (2014). Advantages of crowdfunding as an alternative source of financing of small and medium-sized enterprises. Proceedings of the Faculty of Economics in East Sarajevo8: 39–48

  • Guilliatt R. (1988). Australian Dealmaker: John Cornell The Man Who Sold Hollywood on “Crocodile Dundee”. The New York Times August 21.

  • Gryczka M. (2013). Imperatyw zaufania i współpracy w procesie budowania otwartego ekosystemu wiedzy w Polsce. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe21(1): 85–97

  • Harrison R. (2013). Crowdfunding and the revitalisation of the early stage risk capital market: catalyst or chimera? Venture Capital15(4): 283–287

  • Hauge J.A. and Chimahusky S. (2016). Are promises meaningless in an uncertain crowdfunding environment? Economic Inquiry54(3): 1621–1630

  • Hörisch J. (2015). Crowdfunding for environmental ventures: An empirical analysis of the influence of environmental orientation on the success of crowdfunding initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production 107: 636–645

  • Johnson P.E. Grazioli S. Jamal K. and Berryman R.G. (2001). Detecting deception:adversarial problem solving in a low base-rate world. Cognitive Science25: 355–392

  • Kshetri N. (2015). Success of Crowd-based Online Technology in Fundraising: An Institutional Perspective. Journal of International Management21(2): 100–116

  • Kuti M. and Madarász G. (2014). Crowdfunding. Public Finance Quarterly59(3): 355–366.

  • Lawton K. and Marom D. (2010). The Crowdfunding Revolution – Social networking meets venture financing. Charleston: Kevin Lawton Dan Marom.

  • Lin M. and Viswanathan S. (2016). Home Bias in Online Investments: An Empirical Study of an Online Crowdfunding Market. Management Science62(5): 1393–1414

  • Loewenstein G. and Small D. (2007). The Scarecrow and the Tin Man: The Vicissitudes of Human Sympathy and Caring. Review of General Psychology11(2): 112–126

  • Lukkarinen A. Teich J. E. Wallenius H. and Wallenius J. (2016). Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decision Support Systems87: 26–38

  • Macht S.A. and Weatherston J. (2015). Academic Research on Crowdfunders: What’s Been Done and What’s To Come? Strategic Change24(3): 191–205

  • Manning S. and Bejarano T.A. (2016). Convincing the crowd: Entrepreneurial storytelling in crowdfunding campaigns. Strategic Organization

  • Marcus G.E. (1998). Ethnography Through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Massolution and Crowdsourcing LLC (2012). Crowdfunding Industry Report Market Trends Composition and Crowdfunding Platforms Abridged Version. Massolution and Obtained from: (26.04.2017)

  • Massolution and Crowdsourcing LLC (2015). Massolution Crowdfunding Industry 2015 Report Abridged Version. Massolution and Obtained from: (05.02.2017)

  • Mikołajewska-Zając K. (2016). Sharing as labour and as gift: Couchsurfing as an “affective enterprise.” Ephemera. Theory & Politics in Organization16(4): 209–222.

  • Mikołajewska-Zając K. (2017). Terms of reference. The moral economy of reputation in a sharing economy platform. European Journal of Social Theory

  • Moenninghoff S.C. and Wieandt A. (2013). The Future of Peer-to-Peer Finance. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift Für Betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 65(5): 466–487

  • Mollick E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing29(1): 1–16

  • Mollick E. and Robb A. (2016). Democratizing Innovation and Capital Access: The Role of Crowdfunding. California Management Review58(2): 72–87

  • Moritz A. and Block J.H. (2016). Crowdfunding: A Literature Review and Research Directions. In: D. Brüntje and O. Gajda (eds.) Crowdfunding in Europe State of the Art in Theory and Practice (pp. 25–53). Springer

  • O’Reilly T. (2005). October 30. What is Web 2.0. O’Reilly Network

  • Ordanini A. Miceli L. Pizzetti M. and Parasuraman A. (2011). Crowd-funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. Journal of Service Management 22(4) 443–470

  • Pełka W. (2013). Living Labs as a Form of Innovation Development. Management and Business Administration. Central Europe21(4) 139–152

  • Pitschner S. and Pitschner-Finn S. (2014). Non-profit differentials in crowd-based financing: Evidence from 50000 campaigns. Economics Letters123(3): 391–394

  • PR Newswire (2013). Crowdfunding Market Grows 81% in 2012: Crowdfunding Platforms Raise $2.7 Billion and Fund More Than One Million Campaigns Finds Research Firm Massolution®. Obtained from: (26.04.2017).

  • Richard E.E. and Davis J.R. (2014). NASA Human Health and Performance Center: Open innovation successes and collaborative projects. Acta Astronautica104(1): 383–387

  • Rodak O. (2017). Twitter jako przedmiot badań socjologicznych i źródło danych społecznych: perspektywa konstruktywistyczna. Studia Socjologiczne226(3): 209–236.

  • Royal C. Sampath S. and Windsor G. (2014). Microfinance Crowdfunding and Sustainability: A Case Study of Telecenters in a South Asian Developing Country. Strategic Change23: 425–438

  • Schwartz A.A. (2015). Inclusive Crowdfunding. Utah Law Review516(2014): 661–675.

  • Siering M. Koch J.-A. and Deokar A.V. (2016). Detecting Fraudulent Behavior on Crowdfunding Platforms: The Role of Linguistic and Content-Based Cues in Static and Dynamic Contexts. Journal of Management Information Systems 33(2): 1–35.

  • Sigar K. (2012). Fret no more: Inapplicability of crowdfunding concerns in the internet age and the jobs act’s safeguards. Administrative Law Review 64(2): 473–506.

  • Silver E. and Khatri A. (2016). Endowed by the Crowd? Insights Into the New Wave of Crowdfunding and Its Viability. Journal of Taxation & Regulation of Financial Institutions 29(3): 33–44.

  • Stasik A. (2017). Global controversies in local settings: anti-fracking activism in the era of Web 2.0. online first Journal of Risk Research: 1–17

  • The European Crowdfunding Network AISBL (2014). Review of Crowdfunding Regulation Interpretations of existing regulation concerning crowdfunding in Europe North America and Israel. The European Crowdfunding Network AISBL. Obtained from: (10.06.2016).

  • Torkanovskiy E. (2016). Non-equity Crowdfunding as a National Phenomenon in a Global Industry: The Case of Russia. In: D. Brüntje and O. Gajda (eds.) Crowdfunding in Europe State of the Art in Theory and Practice (pp. 115–123). Springer

  • Turan S.S. (2015). Financial Innovation – Crowdfunding: Friend or Foe? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 195: 353–362

  • US Securities and Exchange Commission (2017). Regulation Crowdfunding: A Small Entity Compliance Guide for Issuers. Obtained from: (26.04.2017).

  • Valanciene L. and Jegeleviciute S. (2013). Valuation of crowdfunding: Benefits and drawbacks. Economics and Management18(1): 39–48

  • Vasileiadou E. Huijben J.C.C.M. and Raven R.P.J.M. (2016). Three is a crowd? Exploring the potential of crowdfunding for renewable energy in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production128: 142–155

  • Vogt N. and Mitchell A. (2016). Crowdfunded Journalism: A Small but Growing Addition to Publicly Driven Journalism – Analysis. Pew Research Center Journalism&Media. Obtained from: (12.07.2007)

  • Von Hippel E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT Press

  • Wardrop R. Zhang B. Rau R. and Gray M. (2015). Moving Mainstream – The European Alternative Finance Benchmarking Report. Obtained from: (26.04.2017).

  • Wheat R.E. Wang Y. Byrnes J.E. and Ranganathan J. (2013). Raising money for scientific research through crowdfunding. Trends in Ecology and Evolution28(2): 71–72

  • World Bank (2013). Crowdfunding’s Potential for the Developing World. Washington DC: World Bank. Finance and Private Sector Development Department. Obtained from: (26.04.2017).

  • Xu B. Zheng H. Xu Y. and Wang T. (2016). Configurational paths to sponsor satisfaction in crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research69(2): 915–927

  • Zheng H. Li D. Wu J. and Xu Y. (2014). The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: A comparative study in China and US. Information and Management 51(4) 488–496

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 959 397 7
PDF Downloads 1627 1389 3