Perception of Women in Top Managerial Positions in Poland

Open access

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the pilot study was to find out whether the perception of candidates for leadership positions differs along with the gender of the candidate in Poland.

Methodology: In order to answer the question, the author has conducted a preliminary experiment on 50 MBA students, which were experienced in recruitment. Two identical CVs were randomly distributed among the participants, with either a male or female version of the CV. Basing on the provided information, respondents were to decide on among others hireability, likeability and offered income to the given candidate.

Findings: The experiment revealed that the female candidate for the CEO position was perceived and evaluated differently than the male candidate. Thus, the experiment indicated that gender inequality may already appear at the phase of recruitment for higher positions.

Originality: The presented study analyzed perceptions of experienced recruiters, which may suggest that such behaviors and patters may be repeated in a non-laboratory environment.

Limitations: A limitation of the pilot study is the low number of participants and therefore further research should be conducted.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Balińska B. (2007). Raport: Polityka równości płci. UNDP Polska.

  • Bartol K.M. (1980). Female managers and quality of working life: the impact of sex role stereotypes. Journal of Occupational Behavior 1: 205-221.

  • Beauvoir S. de (1989). The Second Sex. Vintage books.

  • Berthoin A.A. and Izraeli D.N. (1993). A global comparison of women in management: Women managers in their homelands and as expatriates. In: E. Fagenson (ed.) Women in management: Trends issues and challenges in managerial diversity (pp. 52-96). Newbury Park CA: Sage.

  • Castells M. (1997). The power of Identity. Blackwell Publishers.

  • Centrum Praw Kobiet (2000). Wpływ procesu prywatyzacji na położenie kobiet: kobiety polskie w gospodarce okresu transformacji - raport z badań. Warszawa.

  • Eagly A. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the contradictions. Psychology of Women Quarterly 31 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00326.x

  • Eagly A. and Carli L. (2007). Through the Labyrinth. The truth how women become leaders. Center for Public Leadership.

  • Eagly A. (2005). Achieving relational authenticity in leadership: Does gender matter? Leadership Quarterly https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.007

  • Eagly A.H. and Johannesen-Schmidt M.C. (2001). The Leadership Styles of Women and Men. Journal of Social Issues 57(4) https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241

  • Eagly A.H. Wood W. and Diekman A.B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similiarities: A current Appraisal. Mahwah New Jersey: Erlbaum.

  • Eagly A.H. and Mladinic A. (1994). Are People Prejudiced Against Women? Some Answers From Reasearch on Attiutudes Gender Stereotypes and Judgements of Competence. European Review of Social Psychology 5(1).

  • Eagly A. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation Lawrance Erlbaum Associates https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00326.x

  • Flynn F. and Anderson C. (2003). Heidi vs. Howard: An Examination of Success and Likeability. Columbia Business School and New York University.

  • Forbes (2015). http://csr.forbes.pl/rosnie-rola-kobiet-w-hierarchii-polskich-firmartykuly20068011.html

  • GUS (2014). Kobiety i mężczyźni na rynku pracy 2014 http://stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5821/1/5/1/pw_kobiety_i_mezczyzni_na_rynku_pracy.pdf

  • Heilman M.E. (2001). Affirmative Action: Some unintended Consequences for working women. Research in Organizational Behavior 16: 125-169.

  • Heilman M. and Parks-Stamm E.J. (2007). Gender Stereotypes in the workplace: Obstacles to women’s career progress. Social Psychology 24 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0882-6145(07)24003-2

  • Heilman M.E. and Eagly A.H. (2008). Gender stereotypes are Alive Well and Busy Producing Workplace discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1.

  • Hofstede G. Masculine Index in Poland http://geert-hofstede.com/poland.html (25.01.2017).

  • Hofstede G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences. Sage.

  • Hofstede G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1014&context=orpc (25.01.2017).

  • European Commission (2014). Przeciwdziałanie różnicy w wynagrodzeniu dla kobiet i mężczyzn w Unii Europejskiej http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/files/gender_pay_gap/140319_gpg_pl.pdf

  • Kupczyk T. (2009). Kobiety w zarządzaniu i czynniki ich sukcesów. Wrocław: Wyższa Szkoła Handlowa.

  • Karau S. and Eagly A. (1999). Invited Reaction: Gender Social Roles and the Emergence of Leaders. Human Resource Development Quarterly 10(4): 321-327.

  • McClelland D. (1975). Power: The Inner Experience. New York: Irvington.

  • Moss-Racusin C. Dovidio J.F. Brescoll V.L. Graham J. and Handelsman J. (2012) Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students Proceedings of the National Academy Scineces of the United States of America https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3478626/

  • Operario D. and Fiske S.T. (2004). Stereotypes: Content structures processes and contest. Social Cognition.

  • Peterson V.S. and Runyan A.S. (1993). Global Gender Issues. Oxford: Westview press.

  • Pieńczykowska J. (2014). Kobiety są lepiej wykształcone ale wciąż zarabiają mniej Polskatimes.pl http://www.polskatimes.pl/artykul/3358929kobiety-sa-lepiej-wyksztalcone-ale-wciaz-zarabiaja-mniejidt.html

  • Powell G.N. (1990). One more time: Do male and female managers differ? Academy of Management Executive 12.

  • Powell G.N. and Butterfield D.A. (2013). Sex gender and aspirations to top management: Who’s opting out? Who’s opting in? Journal of Vocational Behavior 82(1) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.11.003

  • Reichel A. Brandt J. and Mayrhofer W. (2005). The strongest Link: Legitimacy of Top Management Diversity Sex Stereotypes and the Rise of Women in Human Resources Management 1995-2004 21(3): 332-352.

  • Sandberg S. (2013). Lean In: Women Work and the will to Lead. Deckle Edge.

  • Schein V.E. (2001). A Global look at Psychological Barriers to Women’s Progress in Management. Journal of Social Issues 57(4): 675-688.

  • Sedlak&Sedlak (2011). Ogólnopolskie Badanie Wynagrodzeń http://wynagrodzenia.pl/artykul/wynagrodzenia-kobiet-i-mezczyzn-w-2011-roku

  • Smulewicz M. http://www.biznes.newseria.pl/news/w_polskich_firmach_ubylop1905735156

  • Sherman H.J. (1996). A holistic Evolutionary View of Racism sexism and class inequality. In: W.M. Dugger (ed.) Inequality; Radical Institutionalist Views on Race Gender Class and Nation (pp. 39-52). Westport London: Greenwood Press.

  • Śmiarowska J. (1925). Higiena kobiety we wszystkich okresach jej życia. Lwów.

  • Titkow A. Duch-Krzystoszek D. and Budrowska B. (2004). Nieodpłatna praca kobiet. Mity realia perspektywy. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.

  • Titkow A. Duch-Krzystoszek D. Budrowska B. (2006). Polka i jej rodzina na tle Europy. Redystrybucja prac domowych: jej uczestnicy i konteksty. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.

  • Titkow A. (2003). Szklany sufit. Bariery i ograniczenia karier kobiet. Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych.

  • Titkow A. (1995). Kobiety pod presją? Proces kształtowania się tożsamości. In: A. Titkow and H. Do- mański (eds.) Co to znaczy być kobietą w Polsce? Warszawa: IFiS PAN.

  • Walczewska S. (2000). Damy rycerze i feministki: kobiecy dyskurs emancypacyjny w Polsce. Kraków: Wydawnictwo eFKa.

  • Witek-Crabb A. (2012). Wybory strategiczne kobiet i mężczyzn na najwyższych stanowiskach kierowniczych. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu 260.

  • Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz A. (2006). Kobiety i instytucje. Kobiety i instytucje. Kobiety na rynku pracy w Stanach Zjednoczonych Unii Europejskiej i w Polsce. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Naukowe „Śląsk”.

  • Żarnowski J. (2000). Praca zawodowa kobiet w Polsce międzywojennej. In: A. Żarnowska i A. Szwarc (eds.) Kobieta i praca. Wiek XIX i XX. Warszawa: DiG.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 422 305 12
PDF Downloads 234 178 8