The impact of transport infrastructure projects on sustainable development within a major logistics gateway in North West England

Dimitrios Paraskevadakis 1 , Alan Bury 1 , Jin Wang 1 , Jun Ren 1 , Stephen Bonsall 1 , and Ian Jenkinson 1
  • 1 Liverpool John Moores University, School of Engineering and Maritime Operations, Logistics Offshore and Marine Research Institute (LOOM), Liverpool, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland


In the North West of England the issue of a perceived infrastructure gap is of increasing concern. Investment needs to be made to improve the transport infrastructure of the region if it is to be expected to promote the development of its own regional logistics gateway. Funding tools have been set up to address the challenges arising from the imbalance in infrastructure development that exists between regions in the north of the United Kingdom and those in the south. For regions with well developed economies the outlook is promising as the availability of modern transport infrastructure looks set to improve. However, some sources believe that the development of new transport infrastructure will have a negative impact upon sustainable development. It is expected that this will occur in a range of both direct and indirect ways. As a result, it is critical that planning for the creation of new intermodal transport infrastructure, or the upgrading of that which already exists, takes into account the impact that these developments will have on the sustainable development of the host region. A scenario based development methodology is proposed in this paper. It was developed to provide a way to identify potential scenarios that may arise within a given region as a result of transport infrastructure projects. To create significant scenarios the methodology is dependent on the availability of a sufficient quantity of quality data. For this paper that data was collected through a focus group composed of stakeholders from the region in question. This was further supported by the performance of an impact survey using the same group of stakeholders.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Amekudzi, A.A., Thomas-Mobley, L. and Ross, C.L. (2007) Transportation planning and infrastructure delivery in major cities and megacities. Transportation Research Record 1997, pp. 17–23.

  • 2. Wassalo, W, (2008) Co-modality, a new buzz-word in the logistics field?, KOMODA project, The Logistics 2008 Congress, Poland.

  • 3. Zografos, K.G.and Regan, A (2004) Current challenges for intermodal freight transport and logistics in Europe and the US. Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1873, pp. 70–78.

  • 4. Bury A., Paraskevadakis D., Wang J., Ren J., Bonsall S., (2014), Workshops report for Significant Transport Infrastructure and its impact on the Sustainable Development, EU project Weastflows Technical Report 2.5, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.

  • 5. Day, R.H. and Zou, G. (1994) Infrastructure, restricted factor substitution and economic growth. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, Vol.23, pp. 149–166.

  • 6. Rees, J. (2005) Trans-European networks: EU Infrastructure proposals Research in Transportation Economics, Vol.15, pp.67-73.

  • 7. Paraskevadakis D., Bury A., Wang J., Ren J., Bonsall S., (2014), Modelling of sustainable development scenarios for logistics and transport systems in NW Europe, EU project Weastflows Technical Report 2.3, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.

  • 8. Rodriquez JP. (2010) Maritime Transportation: Drivers for the Shipping and Port Industries, OECD International Transport Forum.

  • 9. Bowersox, D.J., Closs, D.J. and Cooper, M.B. (2006) Supply Chain Logistics Management, second ed. McGraw-Hill Publishing, New York.

  • 10. Jin, M., Wang, H. and Walden, C. (2004) System performance measures for intermodal transportation with a case study and industrial application. National Center for Intermodal Transportation: A partnership between the University of Denver and Mississippi State University.

  • 11. Antoniou, C., Ben-Akiva, M.E., Bierlaire, M., and Mishalani, R. (1997) Demand Simulation for Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Proceedings of the 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS symposium on transportation systems.

  • 12. Kader, A. (1997) Cost modeling for inland waterway transport systems, A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Liverpool John Moores University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University.


Journal + Issues