There is no doubt about risky nature of international trade. Such risk can be conceptualized as country risk, transportation risk, customer risk and etc. Documentary Letters of Credit (LC) are used as a method of payment in international business for many centuries in order to reduce risk of trade specially when parties are located in different countries and do not have precise information from financial standing of each other. In such occasion LC will reduce the risk of trade by shifting payment obligation from buyer as an individual to a payment guarantee of a bank as a legal entity in return for presentation of complying documents with terms of credit by seller. Familiarity with legal nature and different legal frameworks which govern the international operation of documentary letters of credit can facilitate the process of international trade for businessmen and boost national economies. However, lack of knowledge about them can impose huge losses on international traders. Situation will be more complicated when we understand that there are many internationally recognized legal frameworks which can affect the operation of LC and they get frequently updated in order to address technological and economic developments in global market. In this paper, author tries to answer questions regarding (i) what are international legal frameworks governing operation of documentary letters of credit? (ii) which areas of LC operation has been covered by them and (iii) how do they address the legal questions regarding international operation of documentary letters of credit?
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Ademola A.O. (2008) Letters of Credit: Tower of Babel or Jacob’s ladder? A Look at Whether Private Codifications of Commercial Usage Brings Us Any Closer to a Harmonised International Commercial Law (http://www.dundee.ac.uk/cepmlp/gateway/index.php?news=29287 accessed on 15 July 2015)
2. Arkins J.R.C. (2000) Snow White v. Frost White: the new cold war in banking law Journal of International Banking Law J.I.B.L. 2000 15(2) 31
3. Baker B. Exporting Against Letters of Credit available at http://www.qfinance.com/contentFiles/QF02/g1xtn5q6/12/3/exporting-against-letters-of-credit.pdf (visited 15 July 2015)
4. Baranello J. (2010) Understanding the URDG 758 (http://www.fpsc.com/DB/TreasuryPulse/Fall2010/Article4.html accessed on 15 July 2015)
5. Barski K.A. (1996) Letters of Credit: A Comparison of Article 5 of the Uniform Commercial Code and the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits 41 LOY..L. REV. 735 739
6. Botosh H.M.S. (2002) Striking the Balance Between the Consideration of Certainty and Fairness it the Law Governing Letters of Credit 183-271
7. Buckley R.P. (2002) Documentary Compliance in Documentary Credits: Lessons from the UCC for the UCP 1 J. INT'L COM. L. 60 69
8. Chuah J. (2009) Law of International Trade 4th edn Sweet & Maxwell p. 436.
9. Chung S. I. (1995) Developing a Documentary Credit Dispute Resolution System: An ICC Perspective Fordham Int'l LJ 19 (1995): 1355
10. De Roover. R. (1942) Money Banking and Credit in Medieval Bruges 2 Journal of Economic History (Suppl. Issue) 1942 p.52.
11. Ellinger E.P. (1970) Documentary letters of credit: a comparative study. University of Singapore Press 6-7.
12. Enonchong N. (2011) The Independence Principle of Letters of Credits and Demand Guarantees Oxford University Press 9
13. Eakin v Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. (1989) 875F.2d114.116
14. Garcia R.L.F. (2009) Autonomy principle of the letter of credit Mexican Law Review 72
15. Goode. R. (1991) Abstract Payment Undertakings in Peter Cane and Jane Stapleton (eds) Essays for Patrick Atiyah (OUP 1991).
16. Grassi P.S. (1995) Letter of Credit Transactions: The Banks’ Position in Determining Documentary Compliance. A Comparative Evaluation under U.S. Swiss and German Law’ (1995) Pace International Law Review 106
17. Harfield H. Ward W. (1974) Bank credits and acceptances Ronald Press Company 158-62
18. Hotchkiss C. (1991) Strict Compliance in Letter-of-Credit Law: How Uniform is the Uniform Commercial Code? 23 Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal 295
19. James E.B. (1998) Preface to J.E. Byrne et al. International standbypractices ISP98 6. (ICC Publishing Inc. 1998)
20. Katz R. Report delivered at the I.C.C. Hong Kong meeting reprinted in INT'L Chamber of Commerce ICC Publication No. 470/893 19
21. Krazovska D. (2008) Impact of the Doctrine of Strict Compliance on a Letter of Credit Transaction Master Thesis University of Aarhus 25-43
22. Koudriachov S.A. (2001) Application of the Letter of Credit Form of Payment in the International Business Transactions 10. Current International Trade Law Jurnal 37.
23. Kozolchyk B. (1996) Commercial Letter of Credit in the Americas: A Comparative Study of Contemporary Commercial Transactions Bender 4.
24. Kozolchyk B. (1980) Commercial Letter of Credit in the Americas: A Comparative Study of Contemporary Commercial Transactions. Bender.10
25. Kozolchyk B. (1965) The Legal Nature of the Irrevocable Commercial Letter of Credit 14 American Journal of Comparative Law 1965 p.395 – 398
26. Längerich R. (2000) Documentary Credits in Practice 106
27. King R. Gutteridge and Megrah's Law of Bankers' Commercial Credits p. 14
28. Rodrigo T. (2011) UCP 500 to 600: A forward movement eLaw J. 18 p.20
29. Toth Z. (2006) Documentary Credits in the International Commercial Transaction with Special Focus on Fraud Rule 1 Doctoral Dissertation.
30. Trimble R.F. (1948) The Law Merchant and the Letter of Credit 61 Harvard Law Review 982-86.
31. Turner P.S. (1999) New Rules For Standby Letters of Credit: The International Standby Practices 14. Banking & Finance Law Review 459
32. UCP 600 ICC Publication 2007
33. Ward Petroleum Corp. v Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. (1990) 903 F.2d 1299
34. Wight R. Ward A. (1993) The Advising Bank in Letter of Credit Transactions and the Assumption of Agency Journal of International Banking Law 432
35. Xiang G. Ross P.B. (2003) Unique Jurisprudence of Letters of Credit: Its Origin and Sources The “San Diego Int” l LJ 4 (2003): 104