Characteristic of the Czech Countryside Development Based on Local Population Activities and Attitudes

Eva Cudlínová 1 , Ivana Faltová Leitmanová 1 , Renata Klufová 1 , Ladislav Rolínek 1 ,  and Milan Jílek 1
  • 1 USBE Studentska 13 37005 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic


Our paper tested the role of local population in development of rural municipalities. We focused especially on attitudes and general characteristics of people and tried to answer the question to which extent is the success of village development connected with the kind of people living there. In other words, determining the role of cultural and social capital in rural development. Presented results are based on work carried out by a research team within the three-year project entitled “Countryside as a Space for Living or just a Space for Surviving”, supported by the Czech Ministry of Agriculture 1 . We analyzed statistical data from a fifteen-year period (1995-2009). From the rural area with more than 6,000 villages that fit to OECD definition, villages from sub-urban zones were excluded, leaving an area with approximately 4,500 villages. We decided that demographic development would serve as a main indicator of village prosperity - the increasing number of population during our analyzed period. Four thousand villages were statistically divided into five groups in terms of growing or decreasing number of population due to a different level of combination of two factors - rate of population growth (crude rate of natural increase) and rate of migration (crude rate of net migration). One thousand respondents, from one hundred villages selected at random, were asked about their life conditions in their village. The results we gained partly confirm our hypothesis that the role of cultural capital is not negligible for determining the type of development.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bryden, J., et al. (2001). Differential Economic Performance in Rural Areas. In International Conference on European Rural Policy at the Crossroads. University of Aberdeen, Kings College: The Arkleton Centre for Rural Development Research.

  • Cloke, P. J. (1977). An index of rurality for England and Wales. Regional Studies, 11(1), pp. 31-46. DOI: 10.1080/09595237700185041.

    • Crossref
  • Coffé, H. & Geys, B. (2006). Community Heterogeneity: A Burden for the Creation of Social Capital? Social Science Quarterly, 87(5), pp. 1053-72. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00415.x

    • Crossref
  • Everitt, B. S., G., D. (2001). Cluster Analysis. Bristol: Edward Arnold a member of the Hodder Headline Group.

  • Green, R. J. (1971). Country Planning: The Future of Rural Regions. Manchester: Manchester University Press. ISBN 071900455I.

  • Healey, M. J. & Ilbery, B. W. (1985). The Industralisation of the Countryside. Norwich: Geo Books. ISBN 0860942023.

  • Huigen, P. & Volkers, C. R. (1989). Changes in rural areas in the Netherlands. In van Oort, G. M. R. A. et al. (Eds.), Limits to Rural Landuse (pp. 32-34), Amsterdam: Pudoc. Wageningen.

  • Iravani, M. R. (2010). Role of Social Capital on Development. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 2(2), pp. 966-978.

  • Karadag, M. (2009). On cultural capital and taste. European Societies, 11(4), pp. 531-551. DOI: 10.1080/14616690802317862

    • Crossref
  • Maříková, P. & Majerová, V. (2005). Vymezení venkova. Retrieved 20.5.2012 from /Main/EAFRD/Devel/Vymezeni venkova.doc

  • Lapka, M. & Gottlieb, M. (2000). Rolník a Krajina. Kapitoly ze života soukromých rolníků. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství. pp. 166. ISBN 8085850834.

  • Perlín, R. (1998). Venkov, typologie venkovského prostoru. Retrieved 25.5.2012 from odbor/reforma/perlin.pdf

  • Perlín, R., Kučerová, S. & Kučera, Z. (2010). Typologie venkovského prostoru Česka. Geografie, 115(2), pp. 161-187.

  • Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 24, pp. 1-24. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1.

    • Crossref
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1994). Creating rural indicators for shaping territorial policy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

  • Seoyong, K. & Hyesun K. (2009). Does Cultural Capital Matter?: Cultural Divide and Quality of Life. Social Indicators Research, 93(2), pp. 295-313. DOI: 10.1007/s11205-008-9318-4.

    • Crossref
  • van de Werfhorst, H. G. (2010). Cultural capital: strengths, weaknesses and two advancements. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(2), pp. 157-169. DOI: 10.1080/01425690903539065.

    • Crossref
  • Xu, L. & Song, S. (2011). Study on Construction of Cultural Capital among Entrepreneurs. Asian Social Science. 7(9), pp. 203-206. ISSN 1911-2017.


Journal + Issues