Open access


Ischemic heart disease morbidity and mortality are closely related to global and regional left ventricular function. The evaluation of left ventricular global function is a relevant part in the evolution of ischemic heart disease because it plays a significant role in prognosis prediction and patient management after revascularization. Regional function is also a critical part of the evolution, offering a possible and reliable mode for the assessment of myocardial disease. Currently several techniques for the evaluation of left ventricular parameters and function are in use. In this review we will discuss and compare currently available methods for the evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function such as 2D and 3D echocardiography, 3D speckle-tracking echocardiography, multi-slice computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Murray CJ Lopez AD. Alternativevisions of thefuture: projecting mortality and disability 1990–2020. Boston: Harvard University Press; 1996. p. 325-395.

  • 2. White HD Norris RM Brown MA Brandt PW Whitlock RM Wild CJ. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987;76:44-51.

  • 3. Thomas JD Popovic ZB. Assessment of left ventricular function by cardiac ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:2012-2025.

  • 4. Wong M Johnson G Shabetai R et al. Echocardiographic variables as prognostic indicators and therapeutic monitors in chronic congestive heart failure. Veterans Affairs cooperative studies V-HeFT I and II. V-HeFT VA Cooperative Studies Group. Circulation. 1993;87:Vi65-Vi70.

  • 5. Lang RM Bierig M Devereux RB et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2005;18:1440-1463.

  • 6. Qi X Cogar B Hsiung MC et al. Live/real time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular volumes ejection fraction and mass compared with magnetic resonance imaging. Echocardiography. 2007;24:166-173.

  • 7. Chukwu EO Barasch E Mihalatos DG et al. Relative importance of errors in left ventricular quantitation by two-dimensional echocardiography: insights from three-dimensional echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21:990-997.

  • 8. Corsi C Lang RM Veronesi F et al. Volumetric quantification of global and regional left ventricular function from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic images. Circulation. 2005;112:1161-1170.

  • 9. Nesser HJ Sugeng L Corsi C et al. Volumetric analysis of left ventricular function with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: validation by magnetic resonance and clinical utility testing. Heart. 2007;93:572-578.

  • 10. Thorstensen A Dalen H Hala P et al. Three-dimensional echocardiography in the evaluation of global and regional function in patients with recent myocardial infarction: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Echocardiography. 2013;30:682-692.

  • 11. Helle-Valle T Crosby J Edvardsen T et al. New noninvasive method for assessment of left ventricular rotation: speckle tracking echocardiography. Circulation. 2005;112:3149-3156.

  • 12. Thebault C Donal E Bernard A et al. Real-time three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a novel technique to quantify global left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011;12:26-32.

  • 13. Kleijn SA Aly MF Terwee CB van Rossum AC Kamp O. Reliability of left ventricular volumes and function measurements using three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13:159-168.

  • 14. Bauters C Deneve M Tricot O Meurice T Lamblin N Investigators C. Prognosis of patients with stable coronary artery disease (from the CORONOR study). Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:1142e1145.

  • 15. Lewis EF Moye LA Rouleau JL et al. Study C. Predictors of late development of heart failure in stable survivors of myocardial infarction: the CARE study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:1446-1453.

  • 16. Mahnken AH Gunther RW Krombach GA. The basics of left ventricular functional analysis with MRI and MSCT. Rofo. 2004;176:1365-1379.

  • 17. van Ooijen PM de Jonge GJ Oudkerk M. Informatics in radiology: postprocessing pitfalls in using CT for automatic and semiautomatic determination of global left ventricular function. Radiographics. 2012;32:589-599.

  • 18. Sarwar A Shapiro MD Nasir K et al. Evaluating global and regional left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction by 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. 2009;3:170-177.

  • 19. Busch S Johnson TR Wintersperger BJ et al. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular function with dual-source CT in comparison to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial findings. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:570-575.

  • 20. Greupner J Zimmermann E Grohmann A et al. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography biplane left cineventriculography and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1897-1907.

  • 21. Farsalinos KE Daraban AM Unlu S Thomas JD Badano LP Voigt JU. Head-to-head comparison of global longitudinal strain measurements among nine different vendors: the EACVI/ASE Inter-Vendor Comparison Study. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2015;28:1171-1181.

  • 22. Kaandorp TA Bax JJ Bleeker SE et al. Relation between regional and global systolic function in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy after betablocker therapy or revascularization. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:7

  • 23. Carr JC Simonetti O Bundy J et al. Cine MR angiography of the heart with segmented true fast imaging with steady-state precession. Radiology. 2001;219:828-834.

  • 24. Scharf M Brem MH Wilhelm M et al. Atrial and ventricular functional and structural adaptations of the heart in elite triathletes assessed with cardiac MR imaging. Radiology. 2010;257:71-79.

  • 25. Bellenger NG Burgess MI Ray SG et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1387-1396.

  • 26. Gardner BI Bingham SE Allen MR et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography for the assessment of cardiac volumes and regional function after myocardial infarction: an intrasubject comparison using simultaneous intrasubject recordings. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2009;7:38.

  • 27. Gruszczynska K Krzych LJ Golba KS et al. Statistical agreement of left ventricle measurements using cardiac magnetic resonance and 2D echocardiography in ischemic heart failure. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18:MT19-MT25.

  • 28. Pouleur AC le Polain de Waroux JB Pasquet A et al. Assessment of left ventricular mass and volumes by three-dimensional echocardiography in patients with or without wall motion abnormalities: comparison against cine magnetic resonance imaging. Heart. 2008;94:1050-1057.

  • 29. Collins JD. Global and Regional Function Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease with Cardiac MR Imaging. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015;53:369-395.

  • 30. Chen JL Liu W Zhang H et al. Regional ventricular wall thickening reflects changes in cardiac fiber and sheet structure during contraction: quantification with diffusion tensor MRI. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289:H1898-H1907.

  • 31. Mor-Avi V Lang RM Badano LP et al. Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24:277-313.

  • 32. Bansal M Sengupta PP. Longitudinal and circumferential strain in patients with regional LV dysfunction. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013;15:339.

  • 33. Osman NF Sampath S Atalar E et al. Imaging longitudinal cardiac strain on short-axis images using strain-encoded MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:324-334.

  • 34. Markl M Schneider B Hennig J et al. Cardiac phase contrast gradient echo MRI: measurement of myocardial wall motion in healthy volunteers and patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 1999;15:441-452.

  • 35. Karwatowski SP Mohiaddin RH Yang GZ et al. Regional myocardial velocity imaged by magnetic resonance in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Br Heart J. 1994;72:332-338.

  • 36. Schneider B Markl M Geiges C et al. Cardiac phase contrast gradient echo MRI: characterization of abnormal left ventricular wall motion in patients with ischemic heart disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001;25:550-557.

  • 37. Simpson RM Keegan J Firmin DN. MR assessment of regional myocardial mechanics. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37:576-599.

  • 38. Aletras AH Ingkanisorn WP Mancini C et al. DENSE with SENSE. J Magn Reson. 2005;176:99-106.

  • 39. Korosoglou G Lossnitzer D Schellberg D et al. Strain-encoded cardiac MRI as an adjunct for dobutamine stress testing: incremental value to conventional wall motion analysis. Circulation. 2009;2:132-140.

  • 40. Oyama-Manabe N Ishimori N Sugimori H et al. Identification and further differentiation of subendocardial and transmural myocardial infarction by fast strain-encoded (SENC) magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2362-2368.

  • 41. Hor KN Baumann R Pedrizzetti G et al. Magnetic resonance derived myocardial strain assessment using feature tracking. J Vis Exp. 2011;pii:2356.

  • 42. Schuster A Paul M Bettencourt N et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking for quantitative viability assessment in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. 2013;166:413-420.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 225 127 7
PDF Downloads 91 62 2