Professional education among haemophilia nurses: a survey of current practices


Background: Guidance from the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders (EAHAD) sets out the educational milestones haemophilia nurses should aim to achieve. However, little is known about the resources nurses use for education and current awareness.

Aims: To assess the current educational level of haemophilia nurses, how and where they access ongoing education, where they feel they need extra support, and how best this teaching could be delivered.

Methods: Haemophilia nurses in the Haemnet Horizons group devised and piloted a questionnaire. This was distributed in hard copy to nurses attending the 2019 EAHAD Congress and promoted as an online survey hosted by Survey Monkey.

Results: Seventy-five replies were received from nurses in Europe (46 in the UK), and two from nurses in Chile and the Philippines. Most described their role as ‘specialist nurse’, with the majority having worked in haemophilia care for up to ten years. Half had a nursing degree and one quarter had a nursing diploma. Three quarters had attended at least one course specifically related to haemophilia nursing. Almost all used academic sources, study days and the websites of health profession organisations as information sources. Most also used Google or Wikipedia, but fewer used Twitter. Patient association websites were more popular among non-UK nurses. About half attended sponsored professional meetings and three quarters reported that educational meetings were available in their workplace. A clear majority preferred interactive and face-to-face activities using patient-focused content.

Conclusions: The study shows that nurses, predominantly in Western Europe, access a range of educational resources, most of which are ‘traditional’. Use of online sources is high, but social media are less popular than Google or Wikipedia. Further research is needed to explore the potential of new media for haemophilia nurse education, and whether the current educational levels and needs highlighted in the survey remains the same across the whole of Europe.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. EAHAD Nurses Committee; Harrington C, Bedford M, Andritschke K, et al. A European curriculum for nurses working in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2016; 22: 103-9. doi: 10.1111/hae.12785.

  • 2. Schrijvers L, Bedford M, Elfvinge P, et al. The role of the European haemophilia nurse. J Haem Pract 2014; 1: 24–7. doi: 10.17225/jhp.00008.

  • 3. Ventola CL. Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices Pharmacy & Therapeutics. 2014; 39 (7): 491–520.

  • 4. Nursing and Midwifery Council. Guidance on using social media responsibly. Last updated 3 January 2019. Available from (accessed 1 November 2019).

  • 5. Murthy D. Twitter and health. In: Twitter: Social Communication in the Digital Age, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2018.

  • 6. Jiang S, Beaudoin CE. Health literacy and the internet: an exploratory study on the 2013 HINTS survey. Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 58: 240–8. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.007.

  • 7. Orsini M. Social media: how home health care agencies can join the chorus of empowered voices. Home Health Care Management & Practice. 2009; 22: 213–7. doi:10.1177/1084822309343871.

  • 8. Nichols T. The Death of Expertise: The Campaign Against Established Knowledge and Why it Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.

  • 9. National Cancer Institute. Health information national trends survey (HINTS). 2014. Available from (Accessed 15 November 2019)


Journal + Issues