The construction industry is prone to conflicts and disputes due to complexity, competitive environment, and complicated project documents. In this complex environment, members from various professions, each has their goals and desires to secure the most of his own benefits, work together to build a structure. The objectives of this study were to investigate the frequency, causes, and remedies of disputes in the Central Province of Saudi Arabia. The required data were collected, through a questionnaire survey, from 130 contractors and 54 owners located in the Central Province. This study reveals that disputes in the Saudi construction industry are inevitable with a frequency of occurrence exceeds two disputes per month. Project documents, owners, and contractors to some extent are the sources for such disputes. Project documents are poorly prepared with inaccurate specifications, ambiguity in contract wording, contradictions between project documents, unrealistic project duration, the inaccurate bell of quantities (BOQ), and weakness in contract language. Owners cause great disputes through sizable variation orders exceeding allowable limits, changing item descriptions and quantities in BOQ, interfering in the execution of the contract, and delaying responses to requested information/approvals. Contractors cause disputes through poor contract administration. Contractors follow a combined strategy (mitigating disputes and holding only the disputed work area only) and owners either mitigate disputes or hold disputed scopes. Government owners mostly mitigating disputes and, conversely, private owners hold the disputed scope and continue with the rest of the project. This study is believed to contribute to the current body of knowledge in disputes and contractors and owners by providing effective mitigation techniques that will assist them in minimizing the negative impacts of disputes.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Acharya, N. K., Young, D. L., and Jung, K. K. (2006). Critical Construction Conflicting Factors Identification Using Analytical Hierarchy Process, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 10(3), 165-174.
Assaf, S., Hassanain, M., Abdallah, A., Sayed, A., Alshahrani, A. (2019). Significant causes of claims and disputes in construction projects in Saudi Arabia. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 9(5), pages.
Barman, A. and Charoenngam, C. (2017). Decisional Uncertainties in Construction Projects as Causes of Disputes and their Formal Legal Interpretation by the Courts: Review of Legal Cases in the United Kingdom. American Society of Civil Engineers, 8(3), 1-12.
Blake Dawson Waldron (2006). Scope for Implementation: A Survey of Pressure Points in Australian Construction Industry and Infrastructure Projects. A Report Prepared for the Australian Constructors Association, Blake Dawson Waldron, Sydney.
Cakmak, E. and Cakmak, P. I. (2014). An Analysis of Causes of Disputes in the Construction Industry Using Analytical Network Process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 109, 183-187.
Chan, E. H. W., and Suen, Henry, H. C. H., (2005). Disputes and Dispute Resolution Systems in Sino-Foreign Joint Venture Construction Projects in China, Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 131(2), 141-148.
Cheung, S., Suen H. C. H., and Lam T. (2002). Fundamentals of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes in Construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 128(5), 409-417.
Diekmann, J. and Girard, T. (1995). Are Contract Disputes Predictable?. ASCE. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 121(4), 355-363.
Domínguez, G. and Alfonsom L. (2007). Causes and Consequences of Faulty Arbitration Clauses. Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, 9(2), 111-141.
Fenn, P., Lowe, D., and Speck, C. (1997). Conflict and dispute in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 15(6), 513-518.
Fisk, E. R. and Reynolds W. D. (2014) Construction Project Administration, 10thed. Pearson.
Jaffar, N., Tharim, A. A, and Shuib, M.N. (2011). Factors of Conflict in Construction Industry: A Literature Review, Procedia Engineering, 20, 193-202.
Kumaraswamy, M. (1997). Conflicts, Claims, and Disputes. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 4(2), 95-111.
Mahamid, I. (2016). Micro and macro level of dispute causes in residential building projects: Studies of Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 28(1), 12-20.
Mishmish, M. and El-Sayegh, S. (2018). Causes of Claims in Road Construction Projects in UAE. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(1), 26-33.
Mitkus, S., and Mitkus, T. (2014). Causes of Conflicts in a Construction Industry: A Communicational Approach, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 777-786.
Pétursson, B. K. (2015). Disputes and Conflicts within Construction Contracts in the Icelandic Construction Industry. Thesis, School of Science and Engineering at Reykjavík University.
Rauzana, A. (2016). Causes of Conflicts and Disputes in Construction Projects. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 13(5), 44-48.
Shash, A. A. and Habash, S. I. (2020). Construction Contract Conversion: An Approach to Resolve Disputes. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 10(3), 162-169.
Soni, S., Pandey, M., and Agrawal, S. (2017). Conflicts and Disputes in Construction Projects: An Overview. International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, 7(6), 40-42
Wikipedia (2018) “Cronbach’s Alpha.”, Wikimedia Foundation, 9 August Retrieved from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cronbach’s_alpha.
Wirsching, S. M. (1992). A Guide to Resolving Disputes over Defective Specifications. Mater thesis, Civil Engineering Department, the Pennsylvania State University, USA.