Assessment of Landscape Conflicts in Motorway Planning, NE Hungary

Szilvia Mészáros 1 , Attila Gergely 1 , and Zsuzsanna Illyés 1
  • 1 Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation, Szent István University, H-1118, Budapest, Hungary


Field surveys are essential in the Hungarian motorway planning process so that it would be possible to assess their impacts on the landscape, since the available databases are insufficient in respect of listing all the valuable elements of the landscape. The aims of the research are to analyse the impacts of the planned M30 Motorway (located in north-eastern Hungary) on the landscape, to enumerate the cultural and natural valuable elements of the landscape near and within the area to be expropriated, to explore the possibilities of their protection and to outline the possible land use conflicts likely to arise after the implementation of the motorway. The main sources used for the research were: landscape, green space management and environmental protection studies made for the modification of the affected settlements’ urban plans, field surveys alongside the entire track, and existing environmental databases. In the case of M30 motorway, the chosen corridor was mostly acceptable in the sections where the motorway track leads along the track of the existing Main Road 3, because it is fitted to an existing linear artificial landscape element, it is basically on the border of two natural micro-regions and can also fit into the existing land use structure. Nevertheless, it is not considered to be the best choice in places where it separates vineyards from vine cellars, where it is located within 50 meters from residential areas or where it passes through small plot vineyards or horticultural areas instead of the arable lands of the nearby plain.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aarts, L., Schagen, I. 2006. Driving speed and the risk of road crashes, A review. Accident Analysis and Prevention 38, 215–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.07.004

  • Antrop, M. 2005. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning 70, 21-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

  • Bata, T., Mezősi, G. 2013. Assessing landscape sensitivity based on fragmentation caused by the artificial barriers in Hungary. Journal of Environmental Geography 6 (1-2), 37–47. DOI: 10.2478/v10326-012-0005-1

  • Bengston, D.N., Fletcher, J.O., Nelson, K.C. 2004. Public policies for managing urban growth and protecting open space: policy instruments and lessons learned in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 69 (2), 271–286. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.08.007

  • Bergh, T., Remgard, M., Carlsson, A., Olstam, J., Strömgren, P. 2016. 2+1-roads Recent Swedish Capacity and Level-of Service Experience. Transportation Research Procedia 15, 331–345. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.06.028

  • Blake, J. G., Karr, J. R. 1987. Breeding birds of isolated woodlot: area and habitat relationships. Ecology 68(6), 1724–1734. DOI: 10.2307/1939864

  • Boromisza, Zs., Csima, P., Dublinszki-Boda, B., Módosné Bugyi, I. 2011. Landscape character assessment methodology applied for specific landscape types in Hungary. Problems of Landscape Ecology 30, 233–240.

  • Bramaister, L. 1999. Specific safety measures for emergency lanes and shoulders of motorways. Proposal for motorways' authorities in the framework of the European research project SAFESTAR, Workpackage 1.1. SWOV Institute for Road Safety Research. The Netherlands. Leidschendam.

  • Brody, S.D., Highfield, W., Arlikatti, S., Bierling, D.H., Ismailova, R.M., Lee, L., Butzler, R. 2004. Conflict on the coast: using geographic information systems to map potential environmental disputes in Matagorda Bay, Texas. Environmental Management 34 (1), 11–25. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0256-x

  • Byron, H.J., Treweek, J.R., Sheate, W. R., Thompson, S. 2000. Road deveopments in the UK: An analysis of ecological assessment in environmental impact statements produced between 1993 and 1997. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43(1), 71–97. DOI: 10.1080/09640560010775

  • Csorba, P. 2005. Fragmentation effect of Hungarian road and railway network. ÖKO – Ökológia, környezetgazdálkodás, társadalom 13(3-4), 102–112. (in Hungarian)

  • Department of Landscape Protection and Reclamation, Szent István University (dr. Illyés, Zs., Mészáros, Sz., Gergely, A., Módosné Bugyi, I.). 2016. Landscape, green space management and environmental protection studies made for the modification of affected settlements’ urban plans for the planned motorway No. M30 in the section between Miskolc and Tornyosnémeti. (For each affected 21 settlements, which are mentioned in the paper.) (in Hungarian)

  • Eiter, S., Potthoff, K. 2016. Landscape changes in Norwegian mountains, Increased and decreased accessibility, and their driving forces. Land Use Policy 54, 235–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.02.017

  • European Landscape Convention (Act CXI. 2007 in Hungary)

  • Fi, I. 2000. Minimization of negative environmental impacts to ecosystem. In Fi, I. (ed.) Utak és környezetük tervezése. Budapest. 286–295. (in Hungarian)

  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry 12(2), 219–245. DOI: 10.1177/1077800405284363

  • Forman, R. T. T., Alexander, L. U. 1998. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29, 207–231. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207

  • Gulyas, A. 2006. Research for technical standardisation in Hungary. TRA – Transport research Arena Europe 2006: Goteborg, Sweden, June 12th-15th 2006: Greener, Safer and Smarter Road Transport for Europe. Proceedings. Swedish Road Administration.

  • Gurrutxaga, M., Rubio, L., Saura, S. 2011. Key connectors in protected forest area networks and the impact of highways, A transnational case study from the Cantabrian Range to the Western Alps (SW Europe). Landscape and Urban Planning 101, 310–320. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.036

  • Hawbaker, T. J., Radeloff, V. C., Clayton., M. K., Hammer., R. B., Gonzalez-Abraham, C. E. 2006. Road development, housing growth, and landscape fragmentation in Northern Wisconsin: 1937-1999. Ecological Applications 16(3), 1222–1273. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1222:rdhgal];2

  • Hulme, P. E. 2009. Trade, transport and trouble: managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 10–18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01600.x

  • Ihse, M. 1995. Swedish agricultural landscapes – patterns and changes during the last 50 years, studied by aerial photos. Landscape and Urban Planning 31, 21–37. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(94)01033-5

  • Jones, D. W. 2008. Mass Motorization + Mass Transit. An American History and Policy Analysis. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, United States.

  • Kabai, R. 2010. The Scottish National Programme of Landscape Character Assessment and the application of the results. Tájökológiai Lapok 8 (1), 97–109.

  • Liu, S., Dong, Y., Deng, L., Liu, Q., Zhao, H., Dong, S. 2014. Forest fragmentation and landscape connectivity change associated with road network extension and city expansion: A case study in the Lancang River Valley. Ecological Indicators 36, 160–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.018

  • Lord, J. M., Norton, D. A. 1990. Scale and spatial concept of the fragmentation. Conservation Biology 4(2), 197–202. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00109.x

  • Marosi, S., Somogyi, S. (ed.) 1990. Survey on the natural micro-regions of Hungary I-II. Institute of Geography of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, (in Hungarian)

  • Merriman, P. 2012. Enfolding and Gathering the Landscape: A Geography of England’s M1 Corridor. In: Hvattum, M., Larsen, J. K (ed.) Routes, Roads and Landscapes. University of Oslo, Norway. 213–226.

  • Ministry of National Development of Hungary. 2014-2020. Integrated Operational Programme for Transport Development.

  • Puky, M. 1999. The role of road network in ecosystem. Közút 8(9), 18–19. (in Hungarian)

  • Rostovtzeff, M. I. 1926. The Social & Economic History of the Roman Empire. Biblo & Tannen Publishers. Cheshire, United States.

  • The Landscape Institute with the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment. 2002. Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment. London and New York.

  • TURA-TERV Ltd., RODEN Ltd., ÚT-TESZT Ltd. 2016. Environmental Impact Assessment for the planned motorway No. M30 in the section between Miskolc and Tornyosnémeti. (in Hungarian)

  • TURA-TERV Ltd., RODEN Ltd., UTIBER Ltd. 2016. Permitting Plan for the planned motorway No. M30 in the section between Miskolc and Tornyosnémeti. (in Hungarian)

  • Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. 2013. Evaluation of Methodologies for Visual Impact Assessments. NCHRP Report 741. Washington, D.C.

  • Trombulak, S. C., Frissel, C. A. 2000. Review of Ecological Effects of Roads on Terrestrial and Aquatic Communities. Conservation Biology 14(1), 18–30. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99084.x

  • Yuchu, X., Ji,e G., Peng, S., Xiaohua, G., Yaowen, X. 2016. Impacts of major vehicular roads on urban landscape and urban growth in an arid region, A case study of Jiuquan city in Gansu Province, China. Journal of Arid Environments 127, 235–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.12.002

  • 253/1997. (XII. 20.) Gov. Decree of Hungary on national requirements of urban plans and construction. (in Hungarian)

  • 1247/2016. (V. 18.) Gov. Decision of Hungary on the annual frame of Integrated Operational Programme for Transport Development. (in Hungarian)

  • 345/2012. (XII. 6.) Gov. Decree of Hungary on declaring certain transport development projects as matters of national interests. (in Hungarian)


Journal + Issues