Assessment of ecological values of greening landscape elements in the Great Hungarian Plain

Open access


The research examines the effects of agricultural subsidies on the landscape structure. According to the hypothesis, greening – which has been introduced as part of the European Union’s Common Agriculture Policy (EU CAP) reform –, if it is properly controlled and applied, can be a suitable tool for habitat network development. Landscape elements eligible for greening can function as significant landscape structural elements, and can promote the achievement of goals e.g. in the preservation of biodiversity. As part of this research, field surveys were performed in 2016 and 2017 in the Great Hungarian Plain, where significant landscape elements were assessed and documented in the sample area. During the research, Shape Index and Fractal Dimension Index values for polygonal elements were calculated based on their current extensions in 2016 and in 2017. In line with my basic hypothesis, eligible landscape elements (such as hedgerows, stonewalls, shadoofs and infield trees) do not possess extraordinary ecological values, nor can their persistence be guaranteed solely with greening subsidies. Therefore, they may also not be able to fill their role in the protection of landscape structure and biodiversity in the long term.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Allen B. Buckwell A. Baldock D. Menadue H. 2012. Maximising Environmental Benefits through Ecological Focus Areas. LUPG UK.

  • Didham R. K. 2010. Ecological Consequences of Habitat Fragmentation. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences Published Online: 15 nov 2010

  • Dövényi Z. 2010. Inventory of microregions in Hungary Hungarian Academy of Sciences Geographical Institute Budapest. (In Hungarian)

  • European Parliament and Council resolution No. 1307 of 2013 (XII. 17.) about establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009

  • Forman R. T. T. Godron M. 1986. Landscape Ecology. Wiley.

  • Gustafson E. J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1 143–156. DOI: 10.1007/s100219900011

  • Helzer C. J. Jelinski D. E. 1999. The relative importance of patch area and perimeter–area ratio to grassland breeding birds. Ecological Applications 9(4) 1448–1458. DOI: 10.2307/2641409

  • Kovács M. Kránitz L. Madarász I. Magyari R. Palakovics Sz. Pethő J. Rezneki R. Szabó E. Szerletics Á. Sztahura E. Tengerdi G. Zemle V. 2015. Greening Handbook for Farmers. Nemzeti Agrárgazdasági Kamara Budapest. (In Hungarian)

  • MacArthur R. H. Wilson E. O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press

  • Máté K. 2017. Examination of greening landscape elements. In: Blanka V. Ladányi Zs. (eds): Interdiszciplináris tájkutatás a XXI. században: a VII. Magyar Tájökológiai Konferencia tanulmánykötete 417–424.

  • Máté K. Kollányi L. 2016. The potential impact of greening as a directed land use on the landscape structure. In Valánszki I. Jombach S. Filep-Kovács K. Fábos J. Gy. Ryan R. L. Lindhult M. S. Kollányi L. (eds) Greenways and Landscapes in Change – Proceedings of 5th Fábos Conference on Landscape and Green-way Planning. Budapest 30 June 2016 79–87.

  • Mairota P. Cafarelli B. Boccaccio L. Leronni V. Labadessa R. Kosmidou V. Nagendra H. 2013. Using landscape structure to develop quantitative baselines for protected area monitoring. Ecological indicators 33 82–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.017

  • Matthews A. 2015. Delivering biodiversity through the common agricultural policy. In: Ó hUallacháin D. Finn J.A. (eds.) Farmland Conservation with 2020 Vision Teagasc Wexford 10–11.

  • Ministry of Agriculture of Hungary resolution No. 10 of 2015 (III. 13.) about greening (Greening regulation) (In Hungarian)

  • Ministry of Agriculture of Hungary resolution No. 71 of 2015 (XI. 3.) about the Hungarian land parcel identification system (MePAR) (MePAR regulation) (In Hungarian)

  • Moser D. Zechmeister H.G. Plutzar C. Sauberer N. Wrbka T. Grabherr G. 2002. Landscape patch shape complexity as an effective measure for plant species richness in rural landscapes. Landscape Ecol. 17 657–669. DOI: 10.1023/a:1021513729205

  • Quantum GIS Development Team (2010). Quantum GIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.

  • Sallai R. B. 1999. Field trips around Túrkeve Herman Ottó Természetvédő Kör Túrkeve. p.7.

  • Szabó Sz. 2009. Examining potential applications of landscape metrics in landscape Analysis. Habilitation dissertation. University of Debrecen Faculty of Science and Technology department of Land-scape Protection and Environmental Geography. Debrecen.

  • Turner M. G. Gardner R. H. O’Neill R. V. 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer-Verlag New York.

  • Turner M.G. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20 171–197. DOI: 10.1146/

  • Wilson E. O. Willis E. O. 1975. Applied biogeography. In M. L. Cody and J. M. Diamond (eds.) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press Cambridge Massachusetts USA 522−534

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 251 56 1
PDF Downloads 131 48 1