Assessment of the Financial Performance Transparency of Public Benefit Organisations

Open access


Research purpose. The aim of the research is to assess the transparency of financial performance of public benefit organisations (PBOs).

Methodology. To achieve the aim and to accomplish the tasks set, general-scientific methods were used: the monographic method, the method of document analysis and the graphical method. A statistical analysis method – descriptive statistics – and a sociological research method – surveying – were used as well.

Findings. Since 1 October 2014 when the Public Benefit Organisation Law came into force in Latvia, the number of PBOs has been increasing every year. On 1 January 2018, the number of organisations with valid PBO status had reached 2,775. To get an insight into the opinions of Latvian PBOs on the disclosure of financial information, a questionnaire was developed. The survey was attended by 201 respondents. The questionnaires revealed that 64.68 percent of the respondent organisations had a website or a web page on a social network, although only 21.89 percent of these respondents' websites contained some sort of financial information. In parallel with the PBO survey, a society survey was conducted to get an overview of the public opinions about the need to make PBO financial information freely available. The survey was attended by 116 respondents. The results indicated that although the PBO attitude to the disclosure of financial information was considered to be reserved, the public saw the need for such information. In view of the insufficient availability of financial information in the country and the low activity of PBOs themselves in voluntarily disclosing their financial information on their websites, it is necessary to carry out activities that supplement free-access information resources and/or motivate the organisations themselves to provide free access to such information.

Practical implications. Based on the experience of other European countries, the Ministry of Finance has to consider amending the PBO Law to oblige PBOs to publish their annual financial and performance reports on their websites or in an equivalent way, thereby contributing to the transparency and accountability of the PBOs towards the society.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Association reconnue d'utilité publique Ministère de l’éducation nationale [Accessed 18.02.2018]. Available from Internet <>

  • Dyczkowski T. (2015). Financial and non-financial information in performance assessment of public benefit organizations. Research Papers of the Wroclaw University of Economics vol. 398 134-145.

  • Dyczkowski T. (2016). Applying Text Mining to Analyze the Performance of PBOs on the Basis of Their Obligatory Annual Activity Statements. Problemy Zarzadzania vol. 14.

  • Exploring transparency and accountability regulation of public-benefit foundations in Europe. 2011. European Foundation Centre [Accessed 14.02.2018]. Available from Internet <>

  • Find charities [Accessed 15.02.2018]: Charity commission for England and Wales. Available from Internet <>

  • Gordon T. P.; Khumawala S. B.; Kraut M.; Neely D. G. (2010). Five dimensions of effectiveness for nonprofit annual reports. Nonprofit Management and Leadership vol. 21 (2) 209-228.

  • Israel G.D (1992). Determining Sample Size. Fact Sheet PEOD-6. University of Florida Florida Cooperative Extension Service [Accessed 25.02.2018]. Available from Internet < >

  • Palmer P. D. (2013) Exploring attitudes to financial reporting in the Australian not-for-profit sector. Accounting & Finance vol. 53 (1) 217-241.

  • Reliable Public Benefit Organization [Accessed 25.02.2018]: Spolehlivá veřejně prospěšná organizace. Available from Internet <>

  • Mcdowell E. A.; LI W.; Smith P. C. (2013). An experimental examination of individual donors’ information needs and use. Financial Accountability & Management vol. 29 (3) 327-347.

  • Mitchell G. E. (2014). Creating a philanthropic marketplace through accounting disclosure and intermediation. Public Performance & Management Review vol. 38 (1) 23-47.

  • Moore D.; Hadzi-Miceva K.; Bullain N. (2008). A Comparative overview of Public Benefit Status in Europe. The International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law vol 11 (1).

  • Sabiedriskā labuma organizāciju likums 2004. gada 17.jūnijs (Public benefit Organisation Law. 17 June 2004). 07.07.2004 no. 106 (3054) Latvijas Vēstnesis [Accessed 19.01.2019]. Available from Internet <>

  • Statistika par sabiedriskā labuma organizāciju statusa piešķiršanu un uzraudzību līdz 2017. gada 31.decembrim (Statistics on granting and supervision of the status of public benefit organisation up to 31 December 2017). 2018. VID [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet <>

  • Striebing C. (2017). Professionalization and Voluntary Transparency Practices in Nonprofit Organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership vol. 28 (1) 65-83.

  • Tremblay-Boire J. Prakash A. (2015). Accountability. org: Online disclosures by US nonprofits. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations vol. 26(2) 693-719.

  • Ustawa o działalności pożytku publicznego i o wolontariacie 2003 LexLege [Accessed 18.02.2018].. Available from Internet <>

  • Waniak-Michalak H. Zarzycka E. (2012). Performance measurement of public benefit organizations on the basis of information from financial statements and its influence on their results. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości vol. 68 (124) 147-160.

  • 2011. évi CLXXV. törvény az egyesülési jogról a közhasznú jogállásról valamint a civil szervezetek működéséről és támogatásáról 05.12.2011 Wolters Kluwer [Accessed 18.02.2018]. Available from Internet

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 68 68 8
PDF Downloads 60 60 9