Subjective Well-Being and Job Types: New Evidence From China


Research purpose. The job types might be potential determinants of subjective well-being (SWB), which is seldom investigated in the current literature. This article examines this relationship by collecting data from the Chinese Household Income Project in 2013 to explore this relationship.

Approach. In line with existing studies on SWB, we apply the ordered probit model and further estimate the effects of different job types on SWB.

Findings. This article demonstrates that individuals employed by Sino-foreign joint enterprises tend to have the lowest SWB. On the contrary, those employed by the public sector and private enterprises are more likely to acquire higher satisfaction.

Practical implications. To conclude, job types are closely linked with SWB and job types should be incorporated as a crucial factor when further analysing the SWB.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ahuvia, A. C., (2002). Individualism/collectivism and cultures of happiness: A theoretical conjecture on the relationship between consumption, culture and subjective well-being at the national level. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 23-36.

  • Antinyan, A. (2016). Reference group income and subjective well-being: Empirical evidence from low-income transition economies. Social Indicators Research, 127(3), 1333-1348.

  • Cai, S., & Park, A. (2016). Permanent income and subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 130, 298-319.

  • Eggers, A., Gaddy, C., & Graham, C. (2006). Well-being and unemployment in Russia in the 1990s: Can society's suffering be individuals’ solace?. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(2), 209-242.

  • Fujiwara, D., & Campbell, R. (2011). Valuation techniques for social cost-benefit analysis: stated preference, revealed preference and subjective well-being approaches: a discussion of the current issues. HM Treasury.

  • Fujiwara, D., & Lawton, R. N. (2016). Happier and more satisfied? Creative occupations and subjective wellbeing in the United Kingdom. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 4(2), 50.

  • Goerke, L., & Pannenberg, M. (2015). Direct evidence for income comparisons and subjective well-being across reference groups. Economics Letters, 137, 95-101.

  • Guven, C., & Sørensen, B. E. (2012). Subjective well-being: Keeping up with the perception of the Joneses. Social Indicators Research, 109(3), 439-469.

  • Headey, B., & Wooden, M. (2004). The effects of wealth and income on subjective well-being and ill-being. Economic record, 80, S24-S33.

  • Hudders, L., & Pandelaere, M. (2012). The silver lining of materialism: The impact of luxury consumption on subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3): 411-437.

  • Iyer, R., & Muncy, J. A. (2009). Purpose and object of anti-consumption. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 160-168.

  • Litchfield, J., Reilly, B., & Veneziani, M. (2012). An analysis of life satisfaction in Albania: A heteroscedastic ordered probit model approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(3), 731-741.

  • Luttmer, E. F., (2005). Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 963-1002.

  • Ye, Y., & Lin, L. (2015). Examining relations between locus of control, loneliness, subjective well-being, and preference for online social interaction. Psychological reports, 116(1), 164-175.


Journal + Issues