Consumer Involvement in the Purchasing Process: Consciousness of the Choice

Open access

Abstract

Research purpose. Consumer is becoming demanded one in the purchasing process. Thus, consumer behaviour analyses thinking about his or her involvement in the purchase process could be a solution for marketers. This article concentrates on the consumer’s choice of food products in the purchase process because the author is interested to clarify the connection amongst choice, purchase and wasting of food. The research purpose is to evaluate the consumer’s consciousness in choosing food product in the purchase process.

Design/Methodology/Approach. Quantitative method using questionnaire was applied to 643 respondents whilst implementing formulated aim. Cronbach’s alpha analyses of 35 items (0.870) showed reliability of the research.

Findings. The research results indicated that consumer in the food purchase process is low conscious because he or she does not understand that he or she is buying more than what he or she needs and thus some of his or her purchase becomes waste. Consumer’s consciousness could be seen in the consumer’s lifestyle such as preferences for homemade food.

Originality/Value/Practical implications. The research results could be used in practice and science. Food-producing companies might use some research results making their packaging solutions. The research results could give incites for scientists for future research.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Atkinson L. & Rosenthal S. (2014). Signaling the Green sell: the influence of eco-label source argument specificity and product involvement on consumer trust. Journal of Advert (43) 33-45. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.834803.

  • Biswas A. & Roy M. (2015). Green products: an exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the East. Journal of Cleaner Production (87) 463–468.

  • Cerri J. Testa F. & Rizzi F. (2018). The more I care the less I will listen to you: how information environmental concern and ethical production influence consumers' attitudes and the purchasing of sustainable products Journal of Advert (175) 343–353.

  • Chekima B. Oswald A.I. Wafa S.A.W.S.K. & Chekima K. (2017). Narrowing the gap: factors driving organic food consumption. Journal of Advert (166) 1438-1447. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.086.

  • Costanigro M. Kroll S. Thilmany D. & Bunning M. (2014). Is it Love for Local/Organic or Hate for Conventional? Asymmetric Effects of Information and Taste on Label Preferences in an Experimental Auction. Food Quality and Preference 31(1) 94-105. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.08.008

  • Darnall N. Ji H. & Potoski M. (2017). Institutional design of ecolabels: sponsorship signals rule strength. Regulations and Governance (11) 438-450. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12166.

  • Feldmann C. & Hamm U. (2015). Consumers' perceptions and preferences for local food: a review. Food Quality and Preference (40) 152-164. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.014.

  • Filho E.J.M.A. (2012). Hedonic and social values supporting utilitarian technologies. International Journal of. Innovation and Learning 12(2) 160–180.

  • Filho E.J.M.A. & Brito E.P.Z. (2017). Green attributes converged within multifunctional technology products. Telematics and Informatics (34) 79-90. [Accessed 13.02.2019]. Available from Internet: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.04.008.

  • Fischer D. Stanszus L. Geiger S. Grossman P. & Schrader U. (2017). Mindfulness and sustainable consumption: a systematic literature review of research approaches and findings. Journal of Cleaner Production (162) 544-558. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.007.

  • Ghali Z. (2019). The Antecedents of the Consumer Purchase Intention: Sensitivity to Price and Involvement in Organic Product: Moderating Role of Product Regional Identity. Trends in Food Science & Technology. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.028.

  • Ha H. & Janda S. (2012). Predicting consumer intentions to purchase energy-efficient products. Journal of Consumer Marketing (29) 461-469. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1108/07363761211274974.

  • Handriana T. & Wisandiko W.R. (2017). Consumer attitudes toward advertisement and brand based on the number of endorsers and product involvement: An experimental study. International Journal of Business 19(3) 289-306. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb/article/view/18338/19307

  • Hüttel A. Ziesemer F. Peyer M. & Balderjahn I. (2018). To purchase or not? Why consumers make economically (non-)sustainable consumption choices. Journal of Cleaner Production (174) 827-836. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.019.

  • Joshi & Rahman 2019 Joshi Y. & Rahman Z. (2019). Consumers' Sustainable Purchase Behaviour: Modeling the Impact of Psychological Factors. Ecological Economics (159) 235–243. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.025

  • Kareklas I. Carlson J.R. & Muehling D.D. (2014). ‘I eat organic for my benefit and yours’: egoistic and altruistic considerations for purchasing organic food and their implications for advertising strategists. Journal of Advertising (43) 18-32. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.799450.

  • Kilbourne W. McDonagh P. & Prothero A. (1997). Sustainable consumption and the quality of life: a macromarketing challenge to the dominant social paradigm. Journal of Macromarketing 17 (1) 4–24. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1177/027614679701700103

  • Kim S. Lee S.K. Jeong J. & Moon J. (2019). The effect of agritourism experience on consumers’ future food purchase patterns. Tourism Management (70) 144–152. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.08.003

  • Kytö E. Virtanen M. & Mustonen S. (2019). From intention to action: Predicting purchase behavior with consumers’ product expectations and perceptions and their individual properties. Food Quality and Preference (75) 1–9. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.02.002

  • Laureti T. & Benedetti I. (2018). Exploring pro-environmental food purchasing 339 behaviour: An empirical analysis of Italian consumers. Journal of Cleaner Production (172) 3367-3378. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.086

  • Lee S. Lee J.-H. & Garret T.C. (2013). A study of the attitude toward convergent products: a focus on the consumer perception of functionalities. Journal of Product Innovation Management 30(1) 123–135.

  • Liobikiene G. Grinceviciene S. & Bernatoniene J. (2017). Environmentally friendly behaviour and green purchase in Austria and Lithuania. Journal of Cleaner Production (142) 3789-3797. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.084

  • Lorenz B.A. Hartmann M. & Simons J. (2015). Impacts from region-of-origin labeling on consumer product perception and purchasing intention – Causal relationships in a TPB based model. Food Quality and Preference (45) 149-157. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.06.002

  • Montandon A.C. Ogonowski A. & Botha E. (2017). Product Involvement and the Relative Importance of Health Endorsements. Journal of Food Products Marketing 23(6) 649-667. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: 10.1080/10454446.2015.1048031

  • Nguyen T.N. Lobo A. & Nguyen B.K. (2018). Young consumers' green purchase behaviour in an emerging market. Journal of Strategic Marketing 26 (7) 583–600. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2017.1318946

  • Nuttavuthisit K. & Thøgersen J. (2017). The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of a market for Green products: the case of organic food. Journal of Business Ethics (140) 323-337. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5.

  • Padel S. & Foster C. (2005). Exploring the gap between attitudes and behaviour: understanding why consumers buy or do not buy organic food. British Food Journal 107(8) 606–625. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: doi/pdfplus/10.1108/00070700510611002

  • Park S. C. & Keil M. (2019). The moderating effects of product involvement on escalation behavior. Journal of Computer Information Systems 59(3) 218-232. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2017.1328648

  • Popa M.E. Mitelut A.C. Popa E.E. Stan A. & Popa V.L. (2019). Organic foods contribution to nutritional quality and value. Trends in Food Science & Technology (84) 15-18. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.01.003

  • Prothero A. McDonagh P. & Dobscha S. (2010). Is Green the new Black? Reflections on a Green commodity discourse. Journal of Macromarketing (30) 147-159. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146710361922

  • Rahman I. (2018). The Interplay of Product Involvement and Sustainable Consumption: An Empirical Analysis of Behavioral Intentions Related to Green Hotels Organic Wines and Green Cars. Sustainable Development (26) 399-414. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1713

  • Raosoft (2019). Sample size calculator. [Accessed 20.02.2019]. Available from Internet: http://www.raosoft.com/samplesize.html

  • Sarti S. Darnall N. & Testa F. (2018). Market segmentation of consumers based on their actual sustainability and health-related purchases. Journal of Cleaner Production (192) 270-280. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.188

  • Schuitema G. & de Groot J.I.M. (2015). Green consumerism: the influence of product attributes and values on purchasing intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 14(1) 57–69.

  • Statistics (2018). [Accessed 20.02.2019]. Available from Internet: https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/population-demographic-situation-languages-and-religions-44_lt

  • Statistics (2019). [Accessed 20.02.2019]. Available from Internet: https://osp.stat.gov.lt/informaciniaipranesimai?articleId=6148505

  • Verain M.C.D. Bartels J. Dagevos H. Sijtsema S.J. Onwezen M.C. & Antonides G. (2012). Segments of sustainable food consumers: a literature review. International Journal of Consumer Studies (36) 123-132. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01082.x.

  • Weisstein F.L. Song L. Andersen P. & Zhu Y. (2017). Examining impacts of negative reviews and purchase goals on consumer purchase decision. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (39) 201-107. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.015

  • Xia L. & Monroe K.B. (2009). The influence of pre-purchase goals on consumers' perceptions of price promotions. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management 37(8) 680–694. [Accessed 20.03.2019]. Available from Internet: 10.1108/09590550910966187

  • Zaichkowsky J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research 12(3) 341–352.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 143 143 57
PDF Downloads 79 79 31