Engaged Humanities. New Perspectives of Experience-Oriented Humanities

Open access

Abstract

The term engagement was used in critical cultural studies as a term that name an attitude of scholars, and a feature of cultural and scientific texts, that are based on the experience of an individual or a group of people. In the recent two decades, many of Polish academic narrations on the field of cultural production focused on the issue of engagement. In the article, a phenomenon of engagement in the context of disability studies is considered. The main objective of the article is the analysis of disability studies as a new model of experience- oriented discipline. What is particularly interesting is a possibility to relabel experiences of the disabled as a significant report on the status of modern narrations, which should include different minority bodies. The main aim of disability studies is to present a project of engaged attitudes towards social sustainability that is not based on exclusions of any social groups of people. Studies on disability are also introduced as an experience-oriented discipline in the field of engaged humanities. This article aims at presenting critical narrations on the issue of engagement in other to connect disability studies to the engaged humanities. Promoting engagement in many areas of culture and social life seems to be a way of introducing more open politics towards difference, and social sphere of life that is equally accessible for everyone.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ang I. (2006). From Cultural Studies to Cultural Research. Engaged Scholarship in the Twenty-First Century. Cultural Studies Review (2) 183-197.

  • Bourdieu P. (1996). The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Barnes E. (2009). Disability Minority and Difference. Journal of Applied Philosophy(vol. 26 issue 4)337- 355.

  • Barnes E. (2016). The Minority Body.A Theory of Disability. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Barnes C. Mercer G. (2004). Disability.Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Czapliński P. (2009). Polityka literatury czyli pokazwyanie języka[Politics of literature or poking a tongue]. In Polityka literatury. Przewodnik Krytyki Politycznej [Politics of literature. A companion of Political Critics]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Krytyki Politycznej.

  • Kowalczyk I. (2008). Critical Art.Selected Issues.Culture.pl. [Accessed 10.04.2018]. Available form Internet: http://culture.pl/en/article/critical-art-selected-issues

  • Mitchell D.T Snyder S.L. (2006). Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

  • Nycz R. (2017). Kultura jako czasownik. Sondowanienowejhumanistyki [Culture as a Verb.Sounding the New Humanities].Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Badań Literackich PAN.

  • Piotrowski P. (2012). Art and Democracy in Post-Communist Europe. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 276 160 5
PDF Downloads 190 132 9