Teacher is a key figure in the implementation of reforms in higher education. Pedagogical research of the professional identity (PI) of teacher, her/his priority values, self-evaluation of performances and professional knowledge and the way how she/he conceptualises the profession at an individual level can lead to the most appropriate strategies to manage the educational reforms successfully. This article presents some results of the Latvian-Russian project ‘Professional Identity of Contemporary Pedagogue’ implemented in 2014-2016 by researchers of Riga (Latvia) and Smolensk (Russia). In the realisation of project, a hypothetical model of the content of Higher Education Institution (HEI) teacher’s PI was created, and HEI teachers’ survey was carried out. In total, 198 teachers were surveyed in Riga and Smolensk. The aim of this article is to examine the relevance of the proposed model and analyse the indicators of the first two components of the model: Philosophy of the Profession and Professional Knowledge. The results show that, on the whole, the answers of the Russian and Latvian teachers in the questionnaire are fairly well agreed; however, some differences and peculiarities in the data of Riga and Smolensk were observed. The relevance of the proposed model has been confirmed, and some problems of PI of HEI teachers have been identified. To improve the educational process, executives of the reform and teachers should pay due attention to these problems.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Beijaard D. Meijer P.C. & Verloop N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education (20) 107-128.
Emerson C.H. (2010). Counselor Professional Identity: Construction and Validation of the Counselor Professional Identity Measure. PhD thesis. Greensboro: The University of North Carolina.
European Commission (2015). The Teaching Profession in Europe. Practices Perceptions and Policies. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Goodson I.F. & Cole A.L. (1994). Exploring the teacher’s professional knowledge: Constructing identity and community. Teacher Education Quarterly (21) 85-105.
Healey A.C. & Hays D.G. (2011). Defining Counseling Professional Identity from a Gendered Perspective: Role Conflict and Development. Professional Issues in Counseling. On-Line Journal. Spring. Sam Houston State University. [Accessed 20.03.2017]. Available from Internet: http://www.shsu.edu/~piic/DefiningCounselingProfessionalIdentityfromaGenderedPerspective.htm
Olsen B. & Buchanan R. (2017). “Everyone Wants You to Do Everything”: Investigating the Professional Identity Development of Teacher Educators. Teacher Education Quarterly Winter 2017 9-34.
Radulescu C. (2013) Is Our Professional Identity Reflected in the European Documents on Education? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Studies 78 (2013) 205 - 209.
Woo H.R. (2013). Instrument construction and initial validation: professional identity scale in counseling. PhD thesis University of Iowa. [Accessed 18.02.2017]. Available from Internet: http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/2663.
Вербицкий А.А. (2014). Место и роль преподавателя в процессе реформы образования. Вестник Московского государственного гуманитарного университета им. М.А. Шолохова. Серия: Педагогика и психология (2) 42-51.
Елисеева И.И. (2012). Статистика: учебник для бакалавров. Москва: Издательство Юрайт.