The Issues of the Management of Receivables: Lithuanian Case

Open access


Constant changes in business environment determine the significance of receivables to business. The analysis of the current situation in Lithuania has revealed that a substantial part of business enterprises are facing the problem of overdue receivables. This issue emerged as extremely topical after the beginning of the economic crisis in 2008. A number of scientific studies confirmed that the level of receivables has a significant impact not only on smooth business operation but also on operational results and serves as the cause of numerous economic and social problems, faced by both business enterprises and the state. Rising level of receivables determines slower recovery of total economics because it has a negative impact on the sustainability of the public sector of the country. In addition, the scientists highlight economic problems such as production capacity losses, general decrease in competitiveness and failure to satisfy the debt claims. The social problems include the increase in unemployment rate, fall of living standards, dissatisfaction with poor economics of the country and uncertainty about the future. The aim of this article is to analyse the impact of receivables on business in Lithuania. The methods of the research include scientific literature analysis and statistical data analysis.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aleknavičienė V. & Girdžiūtė L. (2009). Tarptautinių atsiskaitymų kredito rizikos valdymas mažose įmonėse. Vadybos mokslas ir studijos - kaimo verslų ir jų infrastruktūros plėtrai 18(3) 5-12.

  • Badu E. Edwards D. J. & Owusu-Manu D. G. (2012). Trade credit and supply chain delivery in the Ghanaian construction industry: Analysis of vendor interactions with small to medium enterprises. Journal of Engineering Design and Technology 10(3) 360-379.

  • Boden R. & Paul S. Y. (2014). Creditable behaviour? The intra-firm management of trade credit. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management 11(3) 260-275.

  • Boissay F. (2004). Crédits interentreprises et délais de paiement : une théorie financière. Annales d’Economie et de Statistique (73) 101-118.

  • Brennan M. J. Maksimovic V. & Zechner J. (1988). Vendor Financing. Journal of Finance 43(5) 1127-1141.

  • Charitonov V. (2004). Įmonių bankroto prevencija. Metodologinis aspektas. Organizacijų vadyba: sisteminiai tyrimai (30) 67-80.

  • Chludek A. K. (2011). A note on the price of trade credit. Managerial Finance 37(6) 565-574.

  • Dooley M. P. (2000). Debt management and crisis in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics (63) 45-58.

  • Grigonytė I. (2012). Uždelstų debitorinių įsiskolinimų įmonėms įvertinimas Lietuvos rinkoje. Business in XXI Century (2) 1-8.

  • Grigonytė I. & Sūdžius V. (2009). Mokėjimų rizikos įvertinimas Lietuvos Latvijos ir Estijos rinkose. Verslas vadyba ir studijos (4) 7-20.

  • Han X. Wang X. & Wang H. (2013). The inter‐enterprise relationship and trade credit. Nankai Business Review International 4(1) 49-65.

  • Intrum Justitia OY (2013). European payment index 2013. Accessed [11.01.2016]. Available from Internet:

  • Intrum Justitia OY (2014). European payment index 2014. Accessed [11.01.2016]. Available from Internet:

  • Intrum Justitia OY (2015). European payment report 2015. Accessed [11.01.2016]. Available from Internet:

  • Jasienė M. & Laurinavičius A. (2009). Kredito rizikos valdymo įmonėse problemos ir jų sprendimo būdai. Verslas: teorija ir praktika (6) 15-29.

  • Kaleininkaitė L. & Trumpaitė I. (2007). Verslo rizikos valdymas ir jo tobulinimas. Verslas: teorija ir praktika 8(3) 176-181.

  • Kuizinaitė V. & Paliulytė I. (2008). Kapitalo struktūros įtakos įmonių veiklos finansiniams rodikliams analizė. Jaunųjų mokslininkų darbai 1(17) 138-149.

  • Lamminmaki D. & Leitch P. (2011). Refining Measures to Improve Performance Measurement of the Accounts Receivable Collection Function. JAMAR 9(2) 1-20.

  • Lithuanian Department of Statistics (2016). Statistinių rodiklių analizė. Accessed [15.01.2016]. Available from Internet:

  • Liu Y. & Rosenberg C. B. (2013). Legal and European Department; Dealing with private debt distress in the wake of the European financial crisis. IMF working paper 1344. Accessed [10.01.2016]. Available from Internet:

  • Mackevičius J. (2008). Įmonių veiklos analizė - informacijos rinkimo tyrimo ir vertinimo Sistema. Informacijos mokslai (4) 46-56.

  • Mackevičius J. & Rakštelienė A. (2005). Altman modelių taikymas Lietuvos įmonių bankrotui prognozuoti. Ekonomikos ir teorijos praktika: Pinigų studijos (1) 24-42.

  • Malinauskas G. (2014). Pirkėjų skolų valdymo modelis smulkaus verslo įmonėje. Jaunasis mokslininkas (4) 40-48.

  • Nobanee H. & Abraham J. (2015). Current assets management of small enterprises. Journal of Economic Studies 42(4) 549-560.

  • Norvaišienė R. & Stankevičienė J. (2012). The relationship of corporate governance decision on capital structure and company’s performance: evidence from Lithuanian food and beverages industry companies. Economics and management 17(2) 480-486.

  • OECD (2012). Debt & Macroeconomic stability. OECD Economics Department Policy Notes (16) 1-36.

  • Owusu-Manu D. G. Holt G. D. Edwards D. J. & Badu E. (2014). Determinants of trade credit supply among the Ghanaian construction sector. Built Environment Project and Asset Management 4(4) 368-383.

  • Ribeiro H. N. R. Vaicekauskas T. & Lakštutienė A. (2012). The effect of public debt and other determination the economic growth of selected European countries. Economic and management 17(3) 914-921.

  • Snieška V. & Drakšaitė A. (2013). Evaluation of sustainability of the general government debt in a small open economy. Mediterranean journal of social sciences 4(9) 610-618.

  • Sokolov B. & Sokolova Y. (2012). The history of government debt justification. Economic and management 17(3) 922-928.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 562 311 3
PDF Downloads 394 264 2