Effects of Administrator’s Role in Training Programmes and Trainees’ Motivation on Training MaIntenance

Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between the administrator’s role (i.e., communication and delivery mode) in training programmes, trainees’ motivation, and training maintenance. Data were collected from 123 employees of various military health centres in Malaysia. The results of SmartPLS path model analysis revealed two important findings: firstly, communication and trainees’ motivation are positively and significantly related to training maintenance. Secondly, delivery mode and trainees’ motivation are positively and significantly related to training maintenance. As a whole, these findings posit that trainees’ motivation does act as an effective mediating variable in the relationship between the administrator’s role in training programmes and training maintenance in the studied organizations. Further discussions, implications and conclusion are presented in the succeeding sections.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arneson J. Rothwell W. & Naughton J. 2013. Training and development competencies redefined to create competitive advantage. Training & Development 67(1): 42-47.

  • Aziz S. F. A. & Ahmad S. 2011. Stimulating training motivation using the right training characteristic. Industrial and Commercial Training 43(1): 53-61.

  • Azman I. & Nurul I. 2010. Motivasi latihan sebagai pembolehubah penghubung antara program latihan dan keberkesanan latihan. Jurnal Kemanusiaan 16: 83-98.

  • Azman I. Hasan A. B. M. Ahmad Z. S. & Suriawati S. 2010. Supervisor’s role as an antecedent of training transfer and motivation to learn in training programs. Acta Universitatis Danubius 2: 18-38.

  • Azman I. Lucy L. C. S. Mohd Na’eim A. Noor Faizzah D. & Ali B. 2009a. Relationship between supervisor’s role and job performance in the workplace training program. Scientific Annals of the Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi: Economic Sciences Series LVI 237-250.

  • Azman I. Nurul Afiqah F. Muhammad Madi A. & Nurul Huda M. 2013. A study of the correlation between training administration and training motivation. Management & Marketing Challenges for the Knowledge Society 8(1): 95-108

  • Azman I. Sofiah B. Sheela Chitra C. S. Rodney G. & Rabaah T. 2009b. Supervisor communication in training program: An empirical study in Malaysia. Marketing & Management Journal 7(1): 59-68.

  • Baldwin T. T. & Ford J. K. 1988. Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology 41 (2): 63-105.

  • Balkisnah S. & Norhasni Z.A. 2009. Tinjauan faktor-faktor pendorong dan penghalang pemindahan latihan. Sosiohumanika 2 (1): 107 - 123.

  • Barclays D. Higgins C. & Thompson R. 1995. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Study 2(2): 285-309.

  • Blanchard P. N. & Thacker J. W. 2004. Effective training: Systems strategies and practices. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

  • Blume B.D. Ford J.K. Baldwin T.T. & Huang J.L. 2010. Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management 36(4): 1065-1105.

  • Brown T. C. & McCracken M. 2009. Building a bridge of understanding: How barriers to training participation become barriers to training transfer. Journal of European Industrial Training 33(6): 492-512.

  • Chalofsky N. E. Rocco T. S. & Morris M. 2014. Handbook of human resource development. United States of America: Pfeiffer & Company.

  • Chaloner B. 2006. An evaluative study on building the bridge between the training room and the workplace. Educational Research and Evaluation 19(1): 21-37.

  • Chin W. W. 1998. The Partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Hoyle R.H. (Ed.) Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research :307-341. Thousand Oaks - California: Sage Publication Inc.

  • Cresswell J. W. 1998. Educational research: Planning conduct and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

  • Desimone R. L. Werner J. M. & Harris D.M. 2002. Human resource development. USA: Thompson Learning Inc.

  • Eisenberger R. Huntington R. Hutchison S. & Sowa D. 1986. Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology 71(3): 500-507.

  • Elias H. & Rahman W. R. 1994. Achievement motivation training for university students: effects on effective and cognitive achievement motivation. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 2(2): 115-121.

  • Fornell C. & Larcker D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research XVIII: 39-50.

  • Gedeon J.A. 2002. The transfer of training of kaizen improvement skills using relapse prevention by supervisors in a private-sector enterprise. Nova Southeastern University.

  • Gegenfurtner A. Veermans K. Festner D. & Gruber H. 2009. Motivation to transfer training: An integrative literature review. Human Resource Development Review 8(3): 403-423.

  • Goldstein L. & Ford J. K. 2002. Training in organizations: Need assessment development and evaluation (4th ed.). Belmont CA: Wadsworth Group/ Thomson Learning.

  • Gurdjian P. Halbeisen T. & Lane K. 2014. Why leadership- development program fail. McKinsey Quarterly 1: 121-126.

  • Hair J. F. Black W. C. Babin B. J. & Anderson R.E. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

  • Hall B. 2005. How to select the right authoring tool. Training May 46-61.

  • Henseler J. Ringle C. M. & Sinkovics R. R. 2009. The use of the partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. New Challenges to International Marketing Advances in International Marketing 20: 277-319.

  • Hoi Yan C. & Alex W. H. C. 2012. Increasing the competitive positions of countries through employee training: the competitiveness motive across 33 countries. Industrial Journal of Manpower 33(2): 144-158.

  • Inman A. G. 2006. Supervisor multicultural competence and its relation to supervisory process and outcome. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 32(1): 73-85.

  • Jaeggi S. Buschkuehl M. Shah P. & Jonides J. 2014. The role of individual differences in cognitive training and transfer. Memory & Cognition 42(3): 464-480.

  • Jonathan R. B. H. Karen R. C. & Leslie H. 2011. Transfer of crew resource management training: a qualitative study of communication and decision making in two intensive care units. Leadership in Health Services 24(1): 1751-1879.

  • Kennett G. 2013. The impact of training practices on individual organization and industry skill development. Australian Bulletin of Labour 39(1): 112-135.

  • Khalil M. D. 2012. Professional training as a strategy for staff development: a study in training transfer in the Lebanese context. European Journal of Training and Development 36(2/3): 156-178.

  • Klein H. J. Noe R. A. & Wang C. 2006. Motivation to learn and course outcomes: the impact of delivery mode learning goal orientation and perceive barriers and enablers. Personnel Psychology 59(3): 665 - 702.

  • Latif K. F. Jan S. & Shaheen N. 2013. Association of training satisfaction with employee development aspect of job satisfaction. Journal of Managerial Sciences 7(1): 159-178.

  • Locke E. A. & Latham G.P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance Englewood Cliffs New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

  • Machin M. A. & Fogarty G. J. 2004. Assessing the antecedents of transfer intentions in a training context. International Journal of Training and Development 8(3): 222-236.

  • Machin M. A. & Treloar C. 2004. Predictors of motivation to learn when training is mandatory. In Katsikitis M. (eds.) Proceeding of the 39th APS Annual Conference pp. 157-161. Australia: Australian Psychological Society Melbourne Victoria Australia.

  • McCracken M. Brown T. C. & O’Kane P. 2012. Swimming against the current: understanding how a positive organizational training climate can enhance training participation and transfer in the public sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management 25(4): 301-316.

  • Nijman D. J. J. M. Nijhot W. J. Wognum A. A. M. & Veldkamp B. P. 2006. Exploring differential effects of supervisor support on transfer of training. Journal of European Industrial Training 30(7): 529-549.

  • Noe N. E. 2012. Employee Training and Development. 6th Ed. United States of America: McGraw-Hill Education.

  • Noe R. A. 2010. Employee Training and Development. Singapore: McGraw-Hills Education.

  • Noe R. A. Hollenbeck J. H. Gerthartm B. & Wright P. M. 2014. Fundamentals of Human Resource Management. New York: McGraw-Hill International Edition.

  • Nunally J. C. & Bernstein I. H. 1994. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Reynolds D. Rahman I. & Bradetich S. 2014. Hotel managers’ perceptions of value of diversity training: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 26(3): 426-446.

  • Ringle C. M. Wende S. & Will A. 2005. SmartPLS 2.0 M3. Hamburg.

  • Rodrigues C. M. & Gregory S. 2005. Qualitative study of transfer of training of student employees in a service industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research 29(1): 42-66.

  • Sawitri D. & Muis M. 2014. Human resource management: A strategic theoretical perspective. International Journal of Organizational Innovation 6(3): 6-20.

  • Sekaran U. & Bougie R. 2014. Research methods for business: A skill building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

  • Scaduto A. Lindsay D. and Chiaburu D. S. 2008. Leader influences on training effectiveness: motivation and outcome expectation processes. International Journal of Training and Development 12(3): 158-170.

  • Sheehan M. 2014. Investment in training and development in times of uncertainty. Advances in Developing Human Resources 16(1): 13-33.

  • Sung S. Y. & Choi J. N. 2014. Do organizations spend wisely on employees? Effects of training and development investments on learning and innovation in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior 35(3): 393-412.

  • Tai W. T. 2006. Effects of training framing general self-efficacy and training motivation on trainee’s training effectiveness. Personnel Review 35(1): 51-65.

  • Teven J. J. 2010. The Effects of supervisor nonverbal immediacy and power use on employees’ ratings of credibility and affect for the supervisor. Human Communication 13: 69-85.

  • Tsai W. C. & Tai W. T. 2003. Perceived importance as a mediator of the relationship between training assignment and training motivation. Personnel Review 32(2): 151- 163.

  • Vodde R. F. 2012. Changing paradigms in police training: Transitioning from a traditional to an andragogical model. Police Organization and Training 27-44.

  • Vroom V. H. 1964. Work and Motivation. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  • Walker S. Mukhala E. Berg WJ. & Manley. C. R. 2001. Assessment of Communication and Use of Climate Outlooks and Development of Scenarios to Promote Food Security in the Free State Province of South Africa. University of the Free State Africa.

  • Weiss W. H. 2014. Training methods and programs. Supervision 75(2): 18-22.

  • Weissbein D. A. Huang J. L. Ford J. K. & Schmidt A. M. 2011. Influencing learning states to enhance trainee motivation and improve training transfer. Journal of Business and Psychology 26(4): 423-435.

  • Wetzels M. Odekerken-Schroder G. & Van Oppen C. 2009. Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly 33(1): 177-195.

  • Yang Z. 2009. A study of Corporate Reputation’s influence on customer loyalty based on PLS-SEM model. International Business Research 2(3): 28 - 35.

  • Zilliox K. 2013. Strategies for success. Training 50(1): 68-69.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.224
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.395

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 459 251 7
PDF Downloads 221 151 11