Research and Development and Tax Incentives

Open access

Abstract

In many countries, tax incentives are a popular means to achieve political, economic and social objectives. Their aim is to reach and accelerate certain activities of public interest. Furthermore, one of the objectives is to accelerate the development of a certain industry and influence the growth of research and investment in foreign capital. Innovation is the key element that helps a company achieve competitive advantage. Global competition is forced to offer unique products with added values on the market. Tax incentives for research and development are an important factor of innovation. This paper aims to present the importance of research and development, as well as the role of tax incentives. States should use their fiscal policy to stimulate investment in research and development through various forms of tax relief. The Republic of Croatia applies tax incentives for research and development, but to a significantly less extent than other European Union countries.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Batty J. 1976. Accounting for research and development. London: Business Book.

  • Bečić E. and Dabić M. 2008. Analysis of Croatian business sector investment in R&D. Sociological Review 39 (1-2): 69-84.

  • Bratić V. and Urban I. 2006. Tax expenditures in Croatia. Financial Theory and Practice 30 (2): 129-195.

  • Carvalho A. 2011. Why are tax incentives increasingly used to promote private R&D?. CEFAGE-UE Working paper 4 Cefage: Portugal.

  • Central Bureau of Statistics of the Republic of Croatia. 2010. Note 8.2.1..

  • - - -. 2012. Note 8.2.3.

  • David P.A. Hall B.H. and Toole A.A. 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of econometric evidence. Research Policy 29: 497-529.

  • Elschner C. et.al. 2011. What the design of an R&D tax incentive tells about its effectiveness: a simulation of R&D tax incentives in the European Union. Journal of Technology Transfer 36: 233-256.

  • European Commission. 2006. Towards a more effective use of tax incentives in favour of R&D. Communication 728 final. Bruxelles.

  • - - -. 2005. More research and innovation: A common approach. Communication 488 final. Belgium.

  • Eurostat. 2011. Research and development: annual statistics. Bruxelles.

  • Hall B. and Van Reenen J. 2000. How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy 29: 449-469.

  • Hall B. 2002. The financing of research and development. Oxford review of economic policy 18 (1): 35-51.

  • Hinloopen J. 2001. Subsidizing R&D Cooperatives. De Economist 149 (3): 313-345.

  • Hutschenreiter G. 2002. Tax incentives for research and development. Austrian Economic Quarterly 2: 74-85.

  • Kesner-Škreb M. 2001. Tax incentives. Financial Theory and Practice 25 (4): 633-636.

  • Klemm A. 2010. Causes benefits and risks of business tax incentives. International Tax and Public Finance. 17 (3): 315-336.

  • Klemm A. and Van Parys S. 2012. Empirical evidence on the effects of tax incentives. International Tax and Public Finance. 19 (3): 393-423.

  • Kumbhakar et.al. 2010. Corporate R&D and firm efficiency: evidence from Europe's top R&D investors. IPTS Working Paper on corporate R&D and Innovation 11. Joint Research Centre: Spain.

  • Moncada-Paterno-Castello P. et al. 2010. Does Europe perform too little corporate R&D? A comparison of EU and non- EU corporate R&D performance. Research Policy 39: 523-536.

  • OECD. 2002. Frascati Manual: proposed standards practice for surveys on research and experimental development. Paris.

  • Sanchez-Gonzales G. and Herrera L. 2010. The influence of R&D cooperation on innovatory effort. Innovation: Management policy and practice 12 (3): 337-354.

  • Švaljek S. 2007. Private Equity and Venture Capital Industry in Croatia: Tax and Legal Environment. Economic Trends and Economic Policy 17 (113): 53-84.

  • Tassey G. 2007. Tax incentives for innovation: time to restructure the R&E tax credit. Journal of Technology Transfer 32: 605-615.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.224
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.395

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 298 127 4
PDF Downloads 134 64 3