Sharing is Caring, and Millennials Do Care: Collaborative Consumption through the Eyes of Internet Generation

Open access


The purpose of this research is to investigate the effects of perceived value dimensions (i.e., economic value, hedonic value, symbolic value, and social value) on behavioral intent to engage in collaborative consumption from the perspective of Generation Y. Furthermore, this research aims to investigate the mediating effect of young consumers’ attitude toward collaborative consumption on the relationship between perceived value dimensions and behavioral intent to engage in collaborative consumption. Research findings suggest that specific dimensions of perceived value (economic, hedonic, symbolic, and social) have different direct effects on young consumers’ behavioral intention to engage in collaborative consumption services. Regarding the mediating role of consumers’ attitude toward collaborative consumption, it was found that the mediating effect takes place only in the symbolic value-behavioral response link. Given the paucity of research focusing specifically on collaborative consumption from the perspective of Generation Y, this study provides new and useful insights for researchers and managers.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ajzen I. and Fishbein M. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs NJ.

  • Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 (2): 179-211.

  • Aknin L. B. Dunn E. W. Whillans A. V. Grant A. M. and Norton M. I. 2013. Making a difference matters: Impact unlocks the emotional benefits of prosocial spending. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 88: 90–95.

  • Babin B.J. Darden W.R. and Griffin M. 1994. Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research 20 (4): 644-656.

  • Babin B.J. and Attaway J.S. 2000. Atmospheric affect as a tool for creating value and gaining share of customer. Journal of Business Research 49 (2): 91-99.

  • Bagozzi P. R. and Yi Y. 2012. Specification evaluation and interpretation of structural equation models. Academy of Marketing Science 40: 8-34.

  • Bardhi F. and Eckhardt G. M. 2012. Access-based consumption: The case of car-sharing. Journal of Consumer Research 39 (4): 881–898.

  • Barnes S. J. and Mattsson J. 2017. Understanding collaborative consumption: Test of a theoretical model. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 118: 281–292.

  • Baron R. M. and Kenny D. A. 1986. Moderator-mediator variables distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Consumer Research 51 (6): 1173-1182.

  • Belk R. 2014a. You are what you can access: Sharing and Collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research 67: 1595-1600.

  • Belk R. 2014b. Sharing versus pseudo-sharing in Web 2.0. Anthropologist 18: 7-23.

  • Benkler Y. 2004. Sharing nicely: On shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. Yale Law Journal 114: 273–358.

  • Benoit S. Baker S. L. Bolton R. N. Gruber T. and Kandampully J. 2017. A triadic framework for collaborative consumption: Motives activities and resources & capabilities of actors. Journal of Business Research 79: 219-227.

  • Bhattacherjee A. 2001. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. Management Information Systems Quarterly 25 (3): 351-370.

  • Blau P. M. 1964. Exchange & Power in Social Life. Transaction. ISBN 9780887386282.

  • Boksberger P. and Melsen L. 2011. Perceived value: a critical examination of definitions concepts and measures for the service industry. Journal of Services Marketing 25 (3): 229–240.

  • Botsman R. 2015. Thinking. Retrieved from (accessed September 5 2018).

  • Botsman R. and Rogers R. 2010. Beyond Zipcar: Collaborative consumption. Harvard Business Review 88 (10): 30.

  • Böcker L. and Meelen T. 2017. Sharing for people planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 23: 28-39.

  • Bucher E. Fieseler C. and Lutz C. 2016. What’s mine is yours (for a nominal fee) - Exploring the spectrum of utilitarian to altruistic motives for Internet-mediated sharing. Computers in Human Behavior 62: 316-326.

  • Cook K. S. and Rice E. 2006. Social Exchange Theory In DeLamater John. The Handbook of Social Psychology p. 53–76. ISBN 978-0-387-36921-1

  • Deal J. J. Altman D.G. and Rogelberg S.G. 2010. Millennials at work: What we know and what we need to do (if anything). Journal of Business and Psychology 25 (2): 191–199.

  • Fine S. 1980. Toward a theory of segmentation by objectives in social marketing. Journal of Consumer Research 7: 1–13.

  • Emerson R. M. 1976. Social Exchange Theory. Annual Review of Sociology. 2: 335–362.

  • Fornell C. and Larcker D. F. 1981. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (3): 382–388.

  • Godelnik R. 2017. Millennials and the sharing economy: Lessons from a ‘buy nothing new share everything month’ project. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 23: 40–52.

  • Greendex. 2014. Consumer choice and the environment. Available at: (accessed September 2 2018).

  • Hair J. Black W. C. Babin B. J. and Anderson R. E. 2010. Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River New Jersey: Pearson Education International.

  • Hamari J. Sjöklint M. and Ukkonen A. 2015. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 67 (9): 2047-2059.

  • Head L. 2013. Will millennials drive the shift from a consumption-based to a values-based economy? (accessed September 3 2018).

  • Homans G. C. 1958. Social Behavior as Exchange American Journal of Sociology. 63 (6)

  • Homer P. M. and Kahle L. R. 1988. A structural equation test of the value-attitude-behavior hierarchy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Association 54: 638–646

  • Hwang J. and Griffiths M. A. 2017. Share more drive less: Millennials value perception and behavioral intent in using collaborative consumption services. Journal of Consumer Marketing 34 (2): 132-146.

  • Jenkins R. Molesworth M. and Scullion R. 2014. The messy social live of objects: inter-personal borrowing and the ambiguity of possession and ownership. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 13 (2): 131–139.

  • Kaplan A.M. and Haenlein M. 2010. Users of the world unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 53 (1): 59–68.

  • Kim Y. H. Kim D. J. and Wachther K. 2013. A study of mobile user engagement (MoEN): Engagement motivations perceived value satisfaction and continued engagement intention. Decision Support Systems 56 (1): 361-370.

  • Lee Z. W. Y. Chan T. K. H. Balaji M.S. and Chong A. Y. L. 2018. Why people participate in sharing economy: an empirical investigation of Uber. Internet Research 28 (3): 829-850.

  • Lessig L. 2008. Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York: Penguin Press.

  • Möhlmann M. 2015. Collaborative Consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 14: 193-207.

  • Owyang. J. Samuel A. and Grenville A. 2014. Sharing is the new buying Winning in the Collaborative Economy. Available online: (accessed September 4 2018).

  • Pilcher J. 1993. Mannheim’s sociology of generations: an undervalued legacy. BJS. 45 (3)

  • Podsakoff P.M. MacKenzie S.B. and Podsakoff N.P. 2012. Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. Annual Review of Psychology 63: 539-569.

  • Sanchez-Fernandez R. and Iniesta-Bonillo M. Á. 2007. The concept of perceived value: A systematic review of the research. Marketing Theory 7: 427–451.

  • Schor J. and Fitzmaurice C. 2015. Collaborating and connecting: The emergence of the sharing economy. In J. B. Schor and C. Thompson (Eds.) Handbook of research on sustainable consumption p. 410–425. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar.

  • Schroer W. J. 2008. Generations X Y Z and the others. The Portal 409. Retrieved from (accessed September 1 2018).

  • Sheth J. N. Newman B.I. and Gross B.L. 1991. Why we buy what we buy: a theory of consumption values Journal of Business Research 22 (2):159-170.

  • Smith J. B. and Colgate M. 2007. Customer value creation: a practical framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 15 (1): 7 – 23.

  • Stokes K. Clarence E. Anderson L. and Rinne A. 2014. Making Sense of the UK Sharing Economy. Nesta. London.

  • Sweeny J. C. and Soutar G. N. 2001. Consumers perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing 77 (2): 203–220.

  • Tussyadiah I. P. 2015. An Exploratory Study on Drivers and Deterrents of Collaborative Consumption in Travel. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism p. 817-830.

  • Walsh B. 2011. Today’s smart choice: Don’t own. Share. Time. Retrieved from,28804,2059521_2059717_2059710,00.html (accessed August 28 2018).

  • Wang C. and Zhang P. 2012. The evolution of social commerce: The people management technology and information dimensions. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 31 (1): 105–127.

  • Webb T.L. and Sheeran P. 2006. Does changing behavioral intentions engender bahaviour change? A metaanalysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin 132: 249–268.

  • Wong M. Gardiner E. Lang W. and Coulon L. 2008. Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the work-place? Journal of Managerial Psychology 23 (8): 878-890.

  • Woodruff R. B. 1997. Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25: 139–153.

  • Wu J. Zeng M. N. and Xie K. 2017. Chinese travelers’ behavioral intentions toward room sharing platforms: The influence of motivations perceived trust and past experience. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 29 (10): 2688-2707.

  • Zeithaml V.A. 1988. Consumer perceptions of price quality and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing 52 (3): 2-22.

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.224
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.395

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 169 169 37
PDF Downloads 130 130 33