Critical Mass in the Boardroom of Croatian Banks

Open access

Abstract

This paper investigates the influence of gender diversity in the boardroom of Croatian banks on their performance. Specifically, we deal with both management and supervisory boards. Moreover, based on critical mass theory, the authors try to find out what constitutes critical mass. Using a static panel analysis on a sample of all commercial banks that operated in the period 2002-2014, three models were estimated with return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE) and net interest margin (NIM) as dependent variables. Board structure variables include gender of the chairperson, size of the board, share of women on the board and four dummy variables constructed on critical mass theory, specifically uniform group, skewed group, tilted group and balanced group. Other controls employed in the model include capital adequacy, the growth rate of assets at the bank level, ownership, age and a crisis dummy. The main finding is that when a critical mass of 20%-40% of women on the management board has been reached, bank performance improves.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Adams R. B. and Ferreira D. 2009. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics 94: 291-309.

  • Athanasoglou P. P. Brissimis S. N. and Delis M. D. 2005. Bank-Specific Industry Specific and Macroeconomic Determinants of Bank Profitability. Bank of Greece. Working paper No 25: 4-37.

  • Barta T. Kleiner M. and Neumann T. 2012. Is there a payoff from top-team diversity?. McKinsey Quarterly. http://jofisher.com.au/pdf/McKinsey_Quarterly_April2012.pdf (accessed February 19 2016).

  • Baumgärtner S. 2006. Measuring the diversity of what? And for what purpose? A conceptual comparison of ecological and economic biodiversity indices. Working paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=894782 (accessed February 19 2016).

  • Ben Naceur S. 2003. The determinants of the Tunisian banking industry profitability: panel evidence. Universite Libre de Tunis working papers. http://www.mafhoum.com/press6/174E11.pdf (accessed March 10 2016).

  • Bonin J. P. Hasan I. and Wachtel P. 2004. Bank performance efficiency and ownership in transition countries. Bank of Finland Institute for Economies in Transition - BOFIT Discussion Papers No. 7: 5-30. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/bitstream/handle/123456789/8048/113144.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed June 102 2016)

  • Campbell K. and Minguez-Vera A. 2007. Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Financial Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 83: 435–451.

  • Carter D. A. Simkins B. J. and Simpson W. G. 2003. Corporate Governance Board Diversity and Firm Value. The Financial Review 38 (1): 33-53.

  • Carter D. A. Souza F. D. Simkins B. J. and Simpson W. G. 2010. The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 18 (5): 396–414.

  • Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development - CIPD EU Briefing Gender diversity on boards: do quota systems work? https://www.cipd.co.uk/binaries/gender-diversity-on-boards-quota-systems-work_june-2015.pdf (accessed October 1 2016).

  • Claessens S. Demirgüç-Kunt A. and Huizinga H. 2001. How does foreign entry affect domestic banking markets?. Journal of Banking & Finance 25: 891-911.

  • Credit Institutions Act (Official Gazette No. 59/2013 19/2015 and 102/2015) http://www.hnb.hr/documents/20182/506024/e-zakon-o-kreditnim-institucijama-159-2013_19-2015.pdf/fcdde38c-f497-467aad4e-a1a8c554ebc0 (accessed October 1 2016).

  • Coad A. Segarra A. and Teruel M. 2013. Like milk or wine: Does firm performance improve with age?. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 24: 173-189.

  • Croatian National Bank Banks Bulletin No. 29 2016 http://www.hnb.hr/documents/20182/950978/ebilteno-bankama-29.pdf/600f3b4b-068d-4f4b-9e57-1ccaca19aabf (accessed October 5 2016).

  • Crutchley Lending C. and Vähämaa E. 2016. European board structure and director expertise: The impact of quotas. Research in International Business and Finance 39: 486-501.

  • Dalton D. R. daily C. M. Johnson J. L. and Ellstrand A. E. 1999. Number of Directors and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Journal 42 (6): 674-686.

  • De Cabo R. M. Nogués R. G. and Nieto M. J. 2012. Gender Diversity on European Banks’ Board of Directors: Traces of Discrimination. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2): 145-162.

  • Demirgüç-Kunt A. and Huizinga H. 2011. Do we need big banks? Evidence on performance strategy and market discipline. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5576 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1774423 (accessed October 5 2016).

  • Demirgüç-Kunt A. and Huizinga H. 1999. Determinants of commercial bank interest margins and profitability: some international evidence. World Bank Economic Review 13(2): 379-408.

  • Dietrich A. and Wanzenried G. 2011. Determinants of bank profitability before and during the crisis: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions and Money 21 (3): 307-327.

  • Dobbin F. and Jung J. 2011. Corporate Board Gender Diversity and Stock Performance: The Competence Gap or Institutional Investor Bias?. North Carolina Law Review 89: 809-838.

  • Erhardt N.L. Werbel J.D. Shrader C.B. 2003. Board of director diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: Int. Rev. 11: 102–111.

  • European Commission The current situation of gender equality in Spain – Country Profile 2012 http://ec.europa.eu/justice/genderequality/files/epo_campaign/130911_country-profile_spain.pdf (accessed October 2 2016).

  • European Commission Gender Equality Gender balance in decision-making positions http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/gender-decision-making/database/business-finance/supervisory-board-board-directors/index_en.htm (accessed October 2 2016).

  • European parliament The Policy on Gender Equality in Germany 2015 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2015/510025/IPOL_IDA(2015)510025_EN.pdf (accessed October 2 2016).

  • Farrell K. A. and Hersch P. L. 2005. Additions to corporate boards: The effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance 11 (1&2): 85-106.

  • Fields M. A. and Keys P. Y. 2003. The Emergence of Corporate Governance from Wall St. to Main St.: Outside Directors Board Diversity Earnings Management and Managerial Incentives to Bear Risk. The Financial Review 38 (1): 1-24.

  • Fok R. C. W. Chang Y. and Lee W. 2004. Bank Relationships and their Effects on Firm Performance around the Asian Financial Crisis: Evidence from Taiwan. Financial Management 89-112.

  • Francoeur C. Labelle R. and Sinclair-Desgagne B. 2007. Gender Diversity in Corporate Governance and Top Management. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (1): 83–95.

  • Hardwick P. Adams M. and Zou H. 2011. Board Characteristics and Profit Efficiency in the United Kingdom Life insurance Industry. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 38 (7&8): 987-1015.

  • Herring C. 2009. Does Diversity Pay?: Race Gender and the Business Case for Diversity. American Sociological Review 74 (2): 208-224.

  • Huang L. Y. Lai G. C. McNamara M. and Wang J. 2011. Corporate Governance and Efficiency: Evidence from U. S. Property-liability Insurance Industry. The Journal of Risk and Insurance 78 (3): 519-550.

  • Kanter R. M. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation Basic Books New York: 206-242.

  • Konrad A. M. and Kramer V. 2006. How many women do boards need?. Harvard business review 84 (12): 22.

  • Loderer C. and Waelchli U. 2010. Firm Age and Performance MPRA Paper No 26450.

  • Jensen M. C. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution Exit and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance 48 (3): 831-880.

  • Jeon Y. and Miller S. M. 2005. Bank Performance: Market Power or Efficient Structure? University of Connecticut. Economic Working Papers Paper 2005-23.

  • Joecks J. Pull K. and Vetter K. 2013. Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance: What Exactly Constitutes a Critical Mass?. Journal of Business Ethics 118 (1):61-72.

  • Lee J. 2009. Does Size Matter in Firm Performance? Evidence from US Public Firms. International Journal of the Economics of Business 16 (2): 189-203.

  • Lipton M. and Lorsch J. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 48: 59–77.

  • Lückerath-Rovers M. 2013. Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management & Governance 17 (2): 491-509.

  • Ongore V. O. and Kusa G. B. 2013. Determinants of Financial Performance of Commercial Banks in Kenya. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues 3 (1): 237-252.

  • Pathan S. and Faff R. 2013. Does board structure in banks really affect their performance?. Journal of Banking & Finance 37 (5): 1573–1589.

  • Pavic Kramaric T. and Pervan M. 2016. Does Board Structure Affect the Performance of Croatian Banks?. Journal of Financial Studies and Research. 16:1-10.

  • Pavic Kramaric T. Milun T. and Pavic I. 2016. Does Gender Diversity in the Boardroom Influence Tobin’s Q of Croatian Listed Firms?. International Journal of Economic Sciences 5 (3).

  • Pessarossi P. and Weill L. 2013. Do capital requirements affect bank efficiency? Evidence from China. BOFIT Discussion Papers 28 https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/bitstream/handle/123456789/8311/172742.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed November 8 2016).

  • Rasmussen J. L. and Huse M. 2011. Corporate Governance in Norway: Women Directors and Employee Elected Board Members: 121-146 in Mallin C. (ed.) Handbook on International Corporate Governance – Country Analysis Elgar Cheltenham

  • Sameh J. Bouzgarrou H. and Louhichi W. 2016. Bank Profitability during and before Financial Crisis: Domestic vs. foreign banks International Symposium in Computational Economics and Finance Paris - France Vol. 4th

  • Shrader C. B. Blackburn V. and Illes P. 1997. Women in Management and Firm Financial Performance: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Managerial Issues 9 (3): 355-372.

  • Schuknecht L. von Hagen J. and Wolswijk G. 2010. Government bond risk premiums in the EU revisited the impact of the financial crisis. European Central Bank Working Paper Series No 1152

  • Solanas A. Selvan R. M. Navarro J. and Leiva D. 2012. Some Common Indexes of Group Diversity: Upper Boundaries. Working paper. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/45784/1/623311.pdf also available at Proceedings of Measuring Behavior. 2012 Utrecht The Netherlands http://www.measuringbehavior.org/files/2012/ProceedingsPDF%28website%29/Posters/Solanas_et_al_MB2012.pdf (accessed December 8 2015).

  • Staikouras C. K. and Wood G. E. 2004. The Determinants of European Bank Profitability. International Business&Economic Research Journal 3 (6): 57-68.

  • Tipuric D. et al. (2015) Korporativno upravljanje u Hrvatskoj: ocjena kvalitete korporativnog upravljanja hrvatskih dioničkih društava SEECGAN metodologijom (Corporate governance in Croatia: assessment of quality of corporate governance in Croatian joint stock companies using SEECGAN methodology) CIRU – Centar za istraživanje i razvoj upravljanja

  • Torchia M. Calabrò A. and Huse M. 2011. Women Directors on Corporate Boards: From Tokenism to Critical Mass. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (2): 299-317.

  • Villanueva-Villar M. Rivo-López E. and Lago-Peñas S. 2016. On the relationship between corporate governance and value creation in an economic crisis: Empirical evidence for the Spanish case. BRQ Business Research Quarterly 19 (4): 233–245.

  • Yermack D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40 (2): 185-211.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


CiteScore 2018: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.224
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.395

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 231 95 3
PDF Downloads 160 87 1