This research is based on tax policy opinion survey data collected in Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H) among tax experts. A special focus of the survey was to investigate the consequences of the different institutional environments that exist between the two entities of the country. After having reviewed all previous tax reforms in B&H, the most interesting results suggest that respondents agree on the introduction of a progressive personal income tax (PIT) and excise duty on luxury products, the maintenance of personal and family allowances and the maintenance of the current value added tax (VAT) and corporate income tax (CIT) rates. However, differences exist in the respondents’ perceptions about the introduction of reduced VAT rates, the regressivity of the VAT, and giving priority to the equity principle over the efficiency principle in taxation. Probability modelling highlighted these differences and indicated inconsistencies in the definition of the PIT tax base, namely the comprehensiveness of the PIT base under the S-H-S definition of income.
Kapopoulos, P. and Lazareton, S. 2011. Fiscal Policy Stance And Debt Sustainability In SEE Countries: A Comparative Analysis. The South East European Journal of Economics and Business 6 (2): 55-66.
Klun, M. 2014. Slovenian Experiences and Lessons from Tax Reforms. In Tax Reforms: Experiences and Perspectives, edited by H. Blažić, K. Ott, & H. Šimović, 149-157. Zagreb: The Institute of Public Finance.
Kreso, S. 2005. Fiscal Decentralization in B&H. Paper presented at the International Symposium: Bosnia and Herzegovina from Past to Present, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, April.
Kreso, S. and Lazović-Pita, L. 2013. Is Fiscal Discipline and Sustainability Strategy (FDSS) an Appropriate Option For B&H? Paper presented at the 6th International Conference The Changing Economic Landscape: Issues, Implications and Policy Options, Juraj Dobrila University of Pula, Pula, May.
Lim, D., Slemrod, J., Wilking, E. 2013. Expert and Public Attitudes Towards Tax Policy: 2013, 1994, and 1934. National Tax Journal. 66 (4): 775-806.
Musgrave, R.A. and Musgrave P. 1993. Javne financije u teoriji i praksi. [Public finance in theory and practice]. Zagreb: Institut za Javne Financije.
OECD. 2010. Choosing a Broad Base - Low Rate Approach to Taxation. OECD Tax Policy Studies No. 19. Paris. OECD. DOI: 10.1787/9789264091320-en (accessed: May 5, 2011).
Official Gazette of B&H. 2003. Decision on the Establishment of the Commission for the Indirect Tax Policy. Official Gazette of B&H 4.
Schneider, F. 2012. The Shadow Economy and Work in the Shadow: What Do We (Not) Know? IZA DP No. 6423. http://ftp.iza.org/dp6423.pdf (accessed: July 15, 2013).
Šimović, H., Blažić, H., Štambuk, A. 2013. Što porezni stručnjaci misle o poreznom sustavu i poreznoj politici u Hrvatskoj? [What do tax experts think about Croatian tax system and tax policy?]. Porezni vjesnik. 22 (12): 31-37. http://www.ijf.hr/upload/files/file/PV/2013/12/simovic.pdf (accessed: April 20, 2014).
Slemrod, J. 1995. Professional Opinions About Tax Policy: 1994 and 1934. National Tax Journal. 48 (1): 121-147.
Tax Administration of FB&H. 2014. Pregled poreznih obveznika sa iznosom duga po osnovu poreza, doprinosa, taksi i drugih naknada prema evidencijama kantonalnih poreznih ureda nadležnih ispostava na dan 28.02.2014. [Taxpayers debt status for taxes, contributions, fees and other fees according to the records of the cantonal tax offices on February 28, 2014 – a review]. Sarajevo. Tax administration of FB&H.
Tax Administration of RS. 2014. Pregled stanja duga na dan 28. 02. 2014. [Debt Status on February 28, 2014 – a review]. Banja Luka. Tax administration of RS.