The Effect of Corporate Citizenship Activities (CCAS) on Financial Performance and Market Performance: The Omani Experience

Open access


The main objective of this study is to investigate and analyze the effects of corporate citizenship activities on the financial performance and market performance of Omani manufacturing companies in the Sultanate of Oman for the period 2009-2013. The Financial performance of companies is measured by two independent variables: return on assets (ROA) and return on equity (ROE). Market performance is measured by the fair market value of shares (FMV). CCAs are determined by the voluntary disclosures of corporate citizenship activities by the companies. The study concludes that there is a positive impact by CCAs on the financial and market performance of the Omani companies that leads to profit maximization.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Babalola Y. A. 2012. The Impact of corporate social responsibility on firms’ profitability in Nigeria European Journal of Economics Finance and Administrative Sciences 45. Retrieved from: (accessed February 2013).

  • Background Paper. 2007. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship in the Arab World. Paper presentedin the CSR Conference in Cairo Egypt on November 21-22

  • Baker K. H. and Powell G. E. 2005. Understanding Financial Management a Practical Guide. United Kingdom CA: Black well Publishing.

  • Birch D. 2001. Corporate citizenship: Rethinking business beyond corporate social responsibility. In Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship edited by J. Andriof and M. McIntosh 53-65. Greenleaf Sheffield.

  • Blazovich J. L. and Smith L. M. 2009. Ethical corporate citizenship: Does it pay? Paper presented at the symposium on ethics research in Accounting American Accounting Association CA: USA. Retrieved from (accessed October 2012).

  • Cheng B. Ioannis I.and George S. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance Strategic Management Journal 35 1-23.

  • Corporate citizenship. (n.d). Retrieved June 09 2014 from Panasonic Company website

  • El Ghoula S. Guedhamib O. Kwokb C. C. Y. and Mishrac D. R. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affects the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance 35(9): 2388-2406.

  • Fiori G. di Donato F. and Izzo M. F. 2007. Corporate Social responsibility and Firms Performance- An Analysis on Italian Companies. Retrieved from (accessed December 2013).

  • Gardberg N. A. and Fombrun C. J. 2006. Corporatecitizenship: Creating intangibleassets across institutional environments. Academy of Management Review 31(20): 329-346.

  • Gregory A. Tharyan R. and Whittaker J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and company value. Journal of Business Ethics 124 (4):633-657.

  • Hamid K. Rana. S. I. A. Asghar M.and Ahmad S. 2011. Corporate social performance financial performance and market value behavior: An information asymmetry perspective. African Journal of Business Management 5(15): 6342-6349 4 August.

  • Makni R. Claude F. and Francois B. 2009. Causality between corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidence from Canadian firms. Journal of Business Ethics 89(3): 409-422.

  • Matten D. Crane A. and Chapple W. 2003. Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship Journal of Business Ethics 45(1):109-120.

  • Meijer M. M. and Schuyt T. 2005. Corporate social performance as a bottom line for consumer Business and Society 44 442-461.

  • Mulyadi M. S.and Anwar Y. (2012). Impact of corporate social responsibility toward firm value and profitability. The Business Review 19 (2): 316-324.

  • Pang K. C. 2010. Moral development of youth in Hong Kong: Towards a model of immersion through corporate citizenship - An Advanced Model of Corporate Social Responsibility.Journal of Youth Studies 13 (2) (Serial No. 26): 103-112.

  • Pauly D. B. Wickert C. Spence L. and Scherer A. G. 2013. Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: Size matters. Journal of Business Ethics 115(4): 693-705.

  • Servaes H. and Tamayo A. 2013. The Impact of corporate social responsibility on firm value: The Role of customer awareness Management Science 59 (5):1045-1061.

  • Setiawan E. andJanet T. G. 2011. Corporate social responsibility financial performance and market performance: Evidence from Indonesian consumer goods industry. Paper presented at the 6th Asian Business Research Conference 9-10 April University of Surabaya Indonesian. Retrieved from (accessed February 2013).

  • Suillvan J. D. Shkolinkov A. and Lichman J. 2004. Corporate citizenship and its applications in business filed. Retrieved from Centre of International Private (accessed October 2012).

  • Sustainable development. (n.d.). Retrieved September 22 2014 from Raysutcement Company website http://

  • Thomas D. and Preston L. E. 1995. The Stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts evidence and implications. The Academy of Management Review 20(1): 65-91.

  • Uadiale O. M. and Fagbemi T. O. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in developing economies: The Nigerian experience. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 3(4): 44-54.

  • Valor C. 2005. Corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship: Towards corporate accountability. Business and Society Review 110(2): 191-212.

  • Waddock S. A. and Graves S. B. 1997. The Corporate social performance- financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal 18(4): 303-319.

  • Wood D. J. 1991. Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review 16: 691-718.

  • World Economic Forum. 2003. Global competitiveness reports (2003- 4). Retrieved from World Economic Forum website: http:// (accessed May 2014).

  • Yasser R. Q. 2011. Corporate citizenship: A new peak. Retrieved from: (accessed October 2012).

Journal information
Impact Factor

CiteScore 2018: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.224
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.395

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 295 195 6
PDF Downloads 156 113 9