Introduction: In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) complicating an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), the survival depends largely on the restoration of coronary flow in the infarct related artery. The aim of this study was to determine clinical and angiographic predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with OHCA and STEMI, successfully resuscitated and undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (PCI).
Methods: From January 2013 to July 2015, 78 patients with STEMI presenting OHCA, successfully resuscitated, transferred immediately to the catheterization unit and treated with primary PCI, were analyzed. Clinical, laboratory and angiographic data were compared in 28 non-survivors and 50 survivors.
Results: The clinical baseline characteristics of the study population showed no significant differences between the survivors and non-survivors in respect to age (p=0.06), gender (p=0.8), the presence of hypertension (p=0.4), dyslipidemia (p=0.09) obesity (p=1), smoking status (p=0.2), presence of diabetes (p=0.2), a clinical history of acute myocardial infarction (p=0.7) or stroke (p=0.17). Compared to survivors, the non-survivor group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of cardiogenic shock (50% vs 24%, p=0.02), renal failure (64.3% vs 30.0%, p=0.004) and anaemia (35.7% vs 12.0%, p=0.02). Three-vessel disease was significantly higher in the non-survivor group (42.8% vs. 20.0%, p=0.03), while there was a significantly higher percentage of TIMI 3 flow postPCI in the infarct-related artery in the survivor group (80.% vs. 57.1%, p=0.03). The time from the onset of symptoms to revascularization was significantly higher in patients who died compared to those who survived (387.5 +/- 211.3 minutes vs 300.8 +/- 166.1 minutes, p=0.04), as was the time from the onset of cardiac arrest to revascularization (103.0 +/- 56.34 minutes vs 67.0 +/- 44.4 minutes, p=0.002). Multivariate analysis identified the presence of cardiogenic shock (odds ratio [OR]: 3.17, p=0.02), multivessel disease (OR: 3.0, p=0.03), renal failure (OR: 4.2, p=0.004), anaemia (OR: 4.07, p=0.02), need for mechanical ventilation >48 hours (OR: 8.07, p=0.0002) and a duration of stay in the ICU longer than 5 days (OR: 9.96, p=0.0002) as the most significant independent predictors for mortality in patients with OHCA and STEMI.
Conclusion: In patients surviving an OHCA in the early phase of a myocardial infarction, the presence of cardiogenic shock, renal failure, anaemia or multivessel disease, as well as a longer time from the onset of symptoms or of cardiac arrest to revascularization, are independent predictors of mortality. However, the most powerful predictor of death is the duration of stay in the ICU and the requirement of mechanical ventilation for more than forty-eight hours.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Madan M Halvorsen S Di Mario C et al. Relationship between time to invasive assessment and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing an early invasive strategy after fibrinolysis for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a patient-level analysis of the randomized early routine invasive clinical trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:166-74.
2. The GUSTO Innestigators. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:673-82.
3. Widimský P Groch L Zelízko M Aschermann M Bednár F Suryapranata H. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:823-31.
4. Thiele H Ohman EM Desch S Eitel I de Waha S. Management of cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1223-30.
5. Pedersen F Butrymovich V Kelbæk H et al. Short- and longterm cause of death in patients treated with primary PCI for STEMI. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:2101-8.
6. Kunadian V Qiu W Bawamia B Veerasamy M Jamieson S Zaman A. Gender comparisons in cardiogenic shock during ST elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:636-41.
7. Romeo F Acconcia MC Sergi D et al. The outcome of intraaortic balloon pump support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock according to the type of revascularization: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2013;165:679-92.
8. Schwarz B Abdel-Wahab M Robinson DR Richardt G. Predictors of mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2015 Nov 23. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1007/ s00063-015-0118-8.
9. Cao J Liu W Zhu J Zhao H. Risk factors and clinical characteristics of in-hospital death in acute myocardial infarction with IABP support. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8:8032-41.
10. Park JS Cha KS Lee DS et al. Culprit or multivessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Heart. 2015;101:1225-32.
11. Mylotte D Morice MC Eltchaninoff H et al. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction resuscitated cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock: the role of primary multivessel revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;6:115-25.
12. Ostenfeld S Lindholm MG Kjaergaard J et al. Prognostic implication of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with cardiogenic shock and acute myocardial infarction. Resuscitation. 2015;87:57-62.
13. Aissaoui N Puymirat E Simon T et al. Long-term outcome in early survivors of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a landmark analysis from the French registry of Acute ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction(FAST-MI) Registry. Crit Care. 2014;18:516.
14. Demirel F Rasoul S Elvan A et al. Impact of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction admitted for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Impact of ventricular fibrillation in STEMI patients.1Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015;4:16-23.
15. Ielasi A Silvestro A Personeni D et al. Outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main-related ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2015;16:163-9.
16. Lazzeri C Valente S Chiostri M Attanà P Mattesini A Gensini GF. Mechanical ventilation in the early phase of ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with mechanical revascularization. Cardiol J. 2013;20:612-7.
17. Qin Q Qian J Fan B Ge L Ge J. Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction Due to Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015;27:E153-7.
18. Shiraishi J Kohno Y Nakamura T et al. Predictors of in-hospital outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in patients with a high Killip class. Intern Med. 2014;53:933-9.
19. Iqbal MB Al-Hussaini A Rosser G et al. Predictors of survival and favorable functional outcomes after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients systematically brought to a dedicated heart attack center (from the Harefield Cardiac Arrest Study). Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:730-7.
20. Choudry FA Weerackody RP Timmis AD et al. Importance of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for reducing mortality in ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by out of hospital cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015;4:378-85.
21. Zimmermann S Flachskampf FA Schneider R et al. Mild therapeutic hypothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction: long-term results in clinical practice. Clin Cardiol. 2013;36:414-21.
22. Søholm H Wachtell K Nielsen SL et al. Tertiary centres have improved survival compared to other hospitals in the Copenhagen area after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2013;84:162-7.
23. Möllmann H Szardien S Liebetrau C et al. Clinical outcome of patients treated with an early invasive strategy after out-ofhospital cardiac arrest. J Int Med Res. 2011;39:2169-77.