Estimating Probability of Default on Peer to Peer Market – Survival Analysis Approach

Open access


Arguably a cornerstone of credit risk modelling is the probability of default. This article aims is to search for the evidence of relationship between loan characteristics and probability of default on peer-to-peer (P2P) market. In line with that, two loan characteristics are analysed: 1) loan term length and 2) loan purpose. The analysis is conducted using survival analysis approach within the vintage framework. Firstly, 12 months probability of default through the cycle is used to compare riskiness of analysed loan characteristics. Secondly, log-rank test is employed in order to compare complete survival period of cohorts. Findings of the paper suggest that there is clear evidence of relationship between analysed loan characteristics and probability of default. Longer term loans are more risky than the shorter term ones and the least risky loans are those used for credit card payoff.

1. Allen, L. N. and Rose, L. C. (2006). Financial survival analysis of defaulted debtors, Journal of Operational Research Society, 57, 630-636.

2. Atz, U., Bholat, D., (2016) Peer-to-peer lending and financial innovation in the United Kingdom, Bank of England, Staff Working Paper No. 598.

3. Baba, N. and Goko, H. (2006). Survival analysis of hedge funds, Bank of Japan, Working Papers Series No. 06

4. Buis, M. L. (2006) An introduction to Survival Analysis, Working paper, Retrieved from

5. Carling, K., Jacobson, T. and Roszbach, K. (1998). Duration of consumer loans and bank lending policy: dormancy versus default risk, Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance No. 280, Stockholm School of Economics.

6. Chen, D., Han, C., (2012) A Comparative Study of online P2P Lending in the USA and China, Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce,. 17, 1-15

7. De Roure, C., Pelizzon, L., Tasca, P. (2016) How does P2P lending fit into the consumer credit market?, Discussion Paper Deutsche Bundesbank, 30, Retrieved from

8. Duarte J., Siegel S., Young L. (2012) Trust and Credit: The Role of Appearance in Peer-to-peer Lending, Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies, doi:10.1093/rfs/hhs071

9. Glennon, D. and Nigro, P. (2005). Measuring the default risk of small business loans: a survival analysis approach, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 37, 923-947.

10. Golubnicijs, D., (2012) Is Your Peer a Lemon? Relative Assessment of Risk Remuneration on the P2P Lending Market, (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from

11. Käfer, B. (2016) Peer to Peer Lending – A (Financial Stability) Risk Perspective, Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics by the Universities of Aachen · Gießen · Göttingen Kassel · Marburg · Siegen, Retrieved from

12. Malik, M. and Thomas L. (2006). Modelling credit risk of portfolio of consumer loans, University of Southampton, School of Management Working Paper Series No. CORMSIS-07-12.

13. Mason, R., Gunst, F.R. and Hess, J.L. Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments with Application to Engineering and Science, Wiley-Interscience, 2003

14. Milne, A., Parboteeah, P (2016) The Business Models and Economics of Peer-to-Peer Lending, European Credit Research Institute (ECRI), Research Report No 17

15. Narain, B. (1992): Survival Analysis and the Credit Granting Decision. In: Thomas, L. C. – Crook, J. N. – Edelman, D. B. (eds): Credit Scoring and Credit Control. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1992, 109-122.

16. Roszbach, K. (2003). Bank lending policy, credit scoring and the survival of loans, Sverriges Riksbank Working Paper Series No. 154

17. Serrano-Cinca C, Gutiérrez-Nieto B, López-Palacios L (2015) Determinants of Default in P2P Lending. PLoS ONE 10(10): e0139427. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139427

19. Xu, X. (2016) Estimating Lifetime Expected Credit Losses Under IFRS 9, Retrieved from

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.43

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.284
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.910


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 482 422 11
PDF Downloads 200 172 10