According to the volume-outcome concept the postoperative outcome after major pancreatic surgery in high-volume institutions compares favorably to low- volume centers. However, it is not clear whether this is applicable to all low-volume institutions nowadays. The aim of the study was to evaluate the postoperative outcome after major elective pancreatic surgery in a low- volume academic surgical clinic. All consecutive elective major pancreatic cases operated within a 10-year period till October 2013 have been retrospectively reviewed. During the studied period, 36 patients (15 females, 21 males, mean age 54 years, age range 37-76) were scheduled for elective pancreatic surgery and underwent pancreatic resection (n=31, 18 proximal and 13 distal pancreatic resections) or complete pancreatic duct drainage procedure (n=5). Eleven patients had chronic pancreatitis and 25 patients had malignant or benign tumors. Vascular or adjacent organ resection was performed in 9 patients (29% of resections). The overall postoperative morbidity was 36% (n=13), and complications requiring re-operation occurred in 5 patients (14%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days for patients without complications vs. 25 days for patients with any complication. There was no 60- day postoperative mortality or hospital readmission. Major elective pancreatic surgery can be safely performed today in a low-volume academic general surgical clinic, with postoperative outcomes similar to those reported by high-volume centers.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Klotz H, Candinas D, Platz A, Horvath A, Dindo D, Schlumpf R, et al. Preoperative risk assessment in elective general surgery. Br J Surg. 1996;83912): 1788-99.
2. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of Surgical Complications. Ann Surg.2004;240(2):205-13.
3. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel T, Lucas FL, Batista 1, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Eng J Med. 2002; 346(15): 1128-37.
4. Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA. 1998;280(20): 1747-51.
5. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002; 137(6):511-20.
6. Simunovic M, Urbach D, Major D, Sutradhar R, Baxter N, To T, et al. Assessing the volume-outcome hypothesis and region-level quality improvement interventions: pancreas cancer surgery in two Canadian Provinces. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010; 17( 10):2537-44.
7. Schell MT, Barcia A, Spitzer AL, Harris HW. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Volume is not Associated with outcome within an Academic Health Care System. HPB Surgery. 2008; 2008:825940.
8. LaPar DJ, Kron IL, Jones DR, Stukenborg GJ, Kozower BD. Hospital procedure volume should not be used as a measure of surgical quality. Ann Surg. 2012;256(4):606-15.
9. Fisher WE, Hodges SE, Wu MF, Hilsenbeck SG, Brunicardi FC. Assessment of the learning curve for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2012;203(6):684-90.
10. Rosales-Velderrain A, Bowers SP, Goldberg RF, Clarke TM, Buchanan MA, Stauffer JA, et al. National trends in resection of the distal pancreas. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(32):4342-9.
11. Tol J, van Gulik T, Busch O, Gouma D. Centralisation of highly complex low-volume procedures in upper gastrointestinal surgery. A summary of systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Dig Surg.2012;29(5):374-83.
12. Parikh P, Shiloach M, Cohen M, Bilimoria K, Ko C, Hall B, et al. Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-N SQ1P resource. HPB. 2010; 12(7):488-97.
13. Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hirai 1, Kenjo A, Kitagawa Y, et al. A Pancreaticoduodenectomy Risk Model Derived From 8575 Cases From a National Single-Race Population (Japanese) Using a Web-Based Data Entry System: The 30-Day and In-hospital Mortality Rates for Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2013; doi:
13. Kimura W, Miyata H, Gotoh M, Hirai 1, Kenjo A, Kitagawa Y, et al. A Pancreaticoduodenectomy Risk Model Derived From 8575 Cases From a National Single-Race Population (Japanese) Using a Web-Based Data Entry System: The 30-Day and In-hospital Mortality Rates for Pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 2013; doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000263. [PubMed PMID 24253151], )| false
14. Van Heek N, Kuhlmann K, Scholten R, De Castro S, Busch O, van Gulik T, et al. Hospital volume and mortality after pancreatic resection. A systematic review and an evaluation of intervention in the Netherlands. Ann Surg. 2005;242(2):781-90.
15. Teh S, Diggs B, Deveney C, Sheppard B. Patient and hospital characteristics on the variance of perioperative outcomes for pancreatic resection in the United States. A plea for outcome-based and not volume-based referral guidelines. Arch Surg. 2009; 144(8):713-21.