Applanation Tonometry for Assessment of Left Ventricular Systolic Load

Open access

Summary

Vascular-ventricular coupling is a major determinant of left ventricular load. The aim of our study was to assess non- invasively left ventricular load and its dependency on central hemodynamics. Sixty-five healthy and gender-matched individuals were divided in two groups according to their age: 20y/o and 50y/o. Applanation tonometry was performed using the Sphygmocor device. Central pressures and pulse wave analysis indices were computed. Central systolic (120±3 vs. 98±2 mm Hg) and pulse pressures (43±3 vs. 29±1 mm Hg) as well as the augmentation index (AIx75) (23±3 vs. 6±2%) were significantly higher in the 50y/o group (p<0.01). These parameters are relevant markers of arterial stiffness and evidenced the development of central arterial morphological and functional alterations in the older subjects. The time-tension index (TTI) computed from the systolic pressure area was significantly higher in the 50y/o subjects as compared to the 20y/o group (2378±66 vs. 1954±73 mmHg×s, p<0.01). Moreover, we have shown the presence of significant correlation between TTI and AIx75 (p<0.01) in both age groups. This finding confirmed the contribution of arterial stiffness for the impaired vascular-ventricular coupling. In conclusion, applanation tonometry might be utilized for non-invasive evaluation of the left ventricular load, which is an important parameter of cardiovascular risk.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Roth GA Johnson C Abajobir A Abd-Allah F Abera SF Abyu G et al. Global regional and national burden of cardiovascular diseases for 10 causes 1990 to 2015. J Am Coll Cardiol.

  • 2. Chirinos JA Sweitzer N. Ventricular-arterial coupling in chronic heart failure. Card Fail Rev. 2017;3(1):12-8.

  • 3. Sarnoff SJ Braunwald E Welch GH Jr Case RB Stainsby WN Macruz R. Hemodynamic determinants of oxygen consumption of the heart with special reference to the tension time index. Am J Physiol. 1958;192:148-56.

  • 4. Hoffman JI Buckberg GD. The myocardial oxygen supply: demand index revisited. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(1):e000285.

  • 5. Chemla D Antony I Lecarpentier Y Nitenberg A. Contribution of systemic vascular resistance and total arterial compliance to effective arterial elastance in humans. Amer J Physiol. 2003;285(2):H614-20.

  • 6. Avolio A. Arterial Stiffness. Pulse. 2013;1:14-28.

  • 7. Safar ME. Arterial stiffness as a risk factor for clinical hypertension. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(2):97-105.

  • 8. Nilsson PM Boutouyrie P Laurent S. Vascular aging: a tale of EVA and ADAM in cardiovascular risk assessment and prevention. Hypertension. 2009;54:3-10.

  • 9. Cameron JD McGrath BP Dart AM. Use of radial artery applanation tonometry and a generalized transfer function to determine aortic pressure augmentation in subjects with treated hypertension. JACC. 1998;32 (5):1214-20.

  • 10. Chen CH Nevo E Fetics B Pak PH Yin FC Maughan WL et al. Estimation of central aortic pressure waveform by mathematical transformation of radial tonometry pressure. Validation of generalized transfer function. Circulation. 1997;95:1827-36.

  • 11. London GM Pannier B. Arterial functions: how to interpret the complex physiology. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(12):3815-23.

  • 12. Murgo J Westerhof N Giolma JP Altobelli SA. Input Impedance in Normal Man: Relationship to Pressure Wave Forms. Circulation. 1980; 62:105-16.

  • 13. Wilkinson IB MacCallum H Flint L Cockcroft JR Newby DE Webb DJ. The influence of heart rate on augmentation index and central arterial pressure. J Physiol. 2000;525:263-70.

  • 14. McEniery CM Cockcroft JR Roman MJ Franklin SS Wilkinson IB. Central blood pressure: current evidence and clinical importance. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1719-25.

  • 15. Hashimoto J. Central Hemodynamics for Management of Arteriosclerotic Diseases. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2017;24:765-78.

  • 16. Vlachopoulos C Aznaouridis K O’Rourke MF Safar ME Baou K Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with central haemodynamics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Heart J. 2010;31:1865-71.

  • 17. Janner JH Godtfredsen NS Ladelund S Vestbo J Prescott E. The association between aortic augmentation index and cardiovascular risk factors in a large unselected population. J Hum Hypertens. 2012;26:476-84.

  • 18. Buckberg GD Fixler DE Archie JP Hoffman JIE. Experimental subendocardial ischemia in dogs with normal coronary arteries. Circ Res. 1972;30:67-81.

  • 19. Chemla D Nitenberg A Teboul J-L Richard C Monnet C Le Clesiau H et al. Subendocardial viability ratio estimated by arterial tonometry: a critical evaluation in elderly hypertensive patients with increased aortic stiffness. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2008;35:909-15.

  • 20. Scandale G Dimitrov G Recchia M Carzaniga G Minola M Perilli Eet al. Arterial stiffness and subendocardial viability ratio in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Clin Hypertens. 2018;20:478-84.

  • 21. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:373-4.

  • 22. Williams B Mancia G Spiering W. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021-104.

  • 23. Safar ME Blacher J Pannier B Guerin AP Marchais SJ Guyonvarc’h PM et al. Central pulse pressure and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2002;39:735-8.

  • 24. Laurent S Cockcroft J Van Bortel L Boutouyrie P Giannattasio C Hayoz D et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006;27:2588-608.

  • 25. Mitchell GF Parise H Benjamin EJ Larson MG Keyes MJ Vita JA et al. Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 2004;43:1239-45.

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 19 19 13
PDF Downloads 22 22 20