Craniometric points are essential for orienting neurosurgeons in their practice. Understanding the correlations of these points help to manage any pathological lesion located on the cortical surface and subcortically. The brain sulci and gyri should be identified before craniotomy. It is difficult to identify these anatomical structures intraoperatively (after craniotomy) with precision. The main purpose of this study was to collect as much information as possible from the literature and our clinical practice in order to facilitate the placement of craniotomies without using modern neuronavigation systems. Operative reports from the last five years on cranial operations for cortical and subcortical lesions were reviewed. All the craniotomies had been planned, using four methods: detection of craniometric points, computed tomography (CT) scans/topograms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans/topograms, and intraoperative real-time ultrasonography (USG). Retrospectively, we analyzed 295 cranial operations. Our analysis showed that operating on for cortical lesions, we had frequently used the first and the second method mentioned above (118 patients), while in cases of subcortical lesions, we had used craniometric points, MRI scans/topograms and intraoperative real-time USG as methods of neuronavigation (177 patients). These results show that craniometric points are essential in both neurosurgical procedures.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Lynnerup N, Jacobsen JC. Brief communication: age and fractal dimensions of human sagittal and coronal sutures. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2003;12l(4):332-6.
2. Madeline LA, Elster AD. Postnatal development of the central skull base: normal variants. Radiology. 1995;196(3):757-63.
3. Relethford JH, Harpending HC. Craniometric variation, genetic theory, and modern human origins. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994;95(3):249-70.
4. Furuya Y, Edwards MS, Alpers CE, Tress BM, Ousterhout DK, Norman D. Computerized tomography of cranial sutures. Part 1: Comparison of suture anatomy in children and adults. J Neurosurg. 1984;61(1):53-8.
5. Rhoton AL Jr. The Cerebrum. Anatomy. Neurosurgery. 2007:61(Suppl 1):37-118.
6. Yasargil MG. Microneurosurgery, Volume 1: Microsurgical anatomy of the basal cisterns and vessels of the brain, diagnostic studies, general operative techniques. Consideration of the intracranial aneurisms. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1984.
7. Ribas GC, Yasuda A, Ribas EC, Nishikuni K, Rodrigues AJ Jr: Surgical anatomy of microneurosurgical sulcal key points. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(4 Suppl 2):177-210.
8. Wilkinson ID, Romanowski CA, Jellinek DA, Morris J, Griffiths PD. Motor functional MRI for pre-operative and intraoperative neurosurgical guidance. Br J Radiol. 2003;76(902):98-103.
9. Coenen VA, Krings T, Axer H, Weidemann J, Kranzlein H, Hans FJ, et al Intraoperative three-dimensional visualization of the pyramidal tract in a neuronavigation system (PTV) reliably predicts true position of principal motor pathways. Surg Neurol. 2003;60(5):381-90.
10. Ribas GC, Ribas EC, Rodrigues CJ. The anterior sylvian point and the suprasylvian operculum. Neurosurg. Focus 2005;18(6B):E2.
11. Relethford JH. Craniometric variation among modern human populations. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994;95(1):53-62.
12. Yasargil MG, Krisht AF, Ture U, Al-Mefty O, Yasargil DCH. Microsurgery of insular gliomas: Part IV: Surgical treatment and outcome. Contemp Neurosurg. 2002;24(14):1-8.
13. Yaşargil MG, Türe U, Yaşargil DC. Surgical anatomy of supratentorial midline lesions. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;18(6B):E1.
14. Unsgaard G, Rygh OM, Selbekk T, Miiller TB, Kolstad F, Lindseth F, et al. Intra-operative 3D ultrasound in neurosurgery. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;148(3):235-53.
15. Dohrmann GJ, Rubin JM. History of intraoperative ultrasound in neurosurgery. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2001;12(1):155-66.
16. Reisch R, Stadie A, Kockro RA, Hoof N. The keyhole concept in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg. 2013;79 (2 Suppl):S17e 9-13.
17. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Hastreiter P, Fahlbusch R. Intraoperative compensation for brain shift. Surg Neurol. 2001;56(6):357-64.
18. Gonzales-Portillo G. Localization of the central sulcus. Surg Neurol. 1996;46(1):97-9.
19. Bittar RG, Olivier A, Sadikot AF, Andermann F, Pike GB, Reutens DC. Presurgical motor and somatosensory cortex mapping with functional magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. J Neurosurg. 1999;91(6):915-21.
20. Taylor DM, Bernstein M. Awake craniotomy with brain mapping as the routine surgical approach to treating patients with supratentorial intraxial tumors: a prospective trial of 200 cases. J Neurosurg. 1999;90(1):35-41.
21. Roselli R, Iacoangeli M, Pentimalli L, Prezioso A, Scerrati M, Rossi GF. Intraoperative real-time ultrasonography in the microsurgical removal of subcortical or deep-seated brain tumors. Acta Chir Belg. 1993;93(4):185-7.
22. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Kober H, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging combined with neuronavigation: a new concept. Neurosurgery. 2001;48(5):1089-91.
23. Tanriover N, Rhoton AL, Kawashima M, Ulm AJ, Yasuda A. Microsurgical anatomy of the insula and the Sylvian fissure. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(5):891-922.
24. Willems PW, van der Sprenkel JW, Tulleken CA, Viergever MA, Taphoorn MJ. Neuronavigation and surgery of intracerebral tumours. J Neurol. 2006;253(9):1123-36.
25. Aydin K, Kocabicak E, Altun A, Ozaydin I, Yarar E, Cokluk C. Use of topical landmarks for percutaneous projection of intracranial tumors for neurosurgical oncology. Turk Neurosurg. 2012;22(3):280-5.