Flowering Plants Preferred by Bumblebees (Bombus Latr.) in the Botanical Garden of Medicinal Plants in Wrocław

Open access


Due to fewer bumblebees in rural areas these days, it is necessary to look for alternative habitats for the active protection of these very important pollinators. The research was carried out in The Botanical Garden of Medicinal Plants, in Wrocław, Poland. In the garden, approximately 2000 plant species were cultivated, of which 185 were visited by bumblebees. Amongst them, 57 plant species were deemed very attractive and were determined to be indicators for 7 bumblebee species. Indicator species for bumblebees ranged between 6 for Bombus pratorum to up to 20 for B. pascuorum. Monarda didyma was an indicator plant to 6 recorded bumblebee species. Other indicator plant species for at least 4 bumblebees species were: Origanum vulgare, Lavandula angustifolia, Rhododendron catawbiense, Phacelia tanacetifolia, and Agastache rugosa. Three bumblebee species were found to forage the most on 11 of the flowering plant species. The biggest group of plants were those which were mostly visited by 1-2 bumblebee species. Amongst all recorded indicator plants, 32% were native species.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Alford D.V. (2011). Bumblebees. Northern Bee Books.

  • Augsburger C. & Zettel J. (2002). Die Bienenfauna (Hymenoptera Apidae) im Botanischen Garten Bern (Schweiz). Naturforschende Gesellschaft in Bern 59 79–99.

  • Banszak-Cibicka W. & Żmihorski M. (2012). Wild bees along urban gradient: winners and losers. Journal of Insect Conservation 16 331–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-013-0232-7

  • Bembè B. Gerlach G. Schuberth J. Schönitzer K. (2001). Die Wildbienen im Botanisch Garten München. Nachrichtenblatt der Bayerischen Entomologen50 30–41.

  • Corbet S.A. Williams I.H. & Osborne J.L. (1991). Bees and the pollination of crops and wild flowers in the European Community. Bee World 72 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772x.1991.11099079

  • Corbet S.A. Bee J. Dasmahapatra K. Gale S. Gorringe E. La Ferla B. Moorhouse T. Trevail A. Van Bergen Y. Vorontsova M. (2001). Native or exotic? Double or single? Evaluating plants for pollinator–friendly gardens. Annals of Botany 87 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1322

  • Frankie G.W. Thorp R.W. Schindler M. Hernandez J. Ertter B. Rizzardi M. (2005). Ecological Patterns of Bees and Their Host Ornamental Flowers in Two Northern California Cities. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 78 227–246. https://doi.org/10.2317/0407.08.1

  • Gaston K. Smith R. Thomson K. Warren P. (2005). Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 14 395–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-6066-x

  • Goulson D. Hughes W. H. O. Derwent L. C. Stout J. C. (2002). Colony growth of the bumblebee Bombus terrestris in improved and conventional agricultural and suburban habitats. Oecologia 130 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420100803

  • Goulson D. Hanley M.E. Darvill B. Ellis J.S. Knight M.E. (2005). Causes of rarity in bumblebees. Biological Conservation 122 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.06.017

  • Goulson D. (2010a). Bumblebees Behavior Ecology and Conservation. Oxford University Press.

  • Goulson D. (2010b). Bumblebees. In Silent Summer: The State of Wildlife in Britain and Ireland. (pp. 415–429). Cambridge University Press.

  • Hülsmann M. Wehrden H. Klein A.M. Leonhardt S.D. (2015). Plant diversity and composition compensate for negative effects of urbanization on foraging bumble bees. Apidologie 46 760–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-015-0366-x

  • Jabłoński B. & Ruszkowski A. (2000). Rośliny pokarmowe pszczół. Kraków: Polski Klub Ekologiczny.

  • Kowalczyk J. K. Szczepko K. Kurzac T. Pawlikowski T. (2004). Pszczoły (Hymenoptera Apoidea) Ogrodu Botanicznego w Łodzi. In Fauna miast Europy Środkowej 21 wieku. (pp. 67–82) Bydgoszcz: Logo.

  • Küpper G. (1999). Wildbienen (Hymenoptera Apidae) im Siedlungsbereich. Eine Untersuchung der Bienenfauna im Botanischen Garten der Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Natur & Heimat 59(2) 45–52.

  • Martins A.C. Gonçalves R.B. & Melo G.A. (2013). Changes in wild bee fauna of a grassland in Brazil reveal negative effects associated with growing urbanization during the last 40 years. Zoologia (Curitiba) 30(2) 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-46702013000200006

  • McFrederick Q. S. & LeBuhn G. (2006). Are urban parks refuges for bumble bees Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae)?. Biological Conservation 129(3) 372–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.11.004

  • Münze R. Langner D. & Nuß M. (2006). Die Bienenfauna des Botanischen Gartens Dresden (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Sächsische Entomologische Zeitschrift 1 45–69.

  • Pawlikowski T. (1996). Klucze do oznaczania owadów Polski cz. XXIV Błonkówki–Hymenoptera. Toruń: Oficyna Wydawnicza Turpress.

  • Pawlikowski T. & Pawlikowski K. (2012). Trzmielowate Polski (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombini). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika.

  • Pawlikowski T. Olszewski P. Żyła W. Przybylińska M. (2016). The rare oligolectic bumblebee Bombus gerstaeckeri Morawitz 1882 from Poland. Spixiana 39(1) 130.

  • Peters G. (1972). Ursachen für den Rückgang der seltenen heimishchen Hummelarten (Hym. Bombus et Psithyrus). Entomologische Berichte 1972 85–90.

  • Potts S.G. Biesmeijer J.C. Kremen C. Neumann P. Schweiger O. Kunin W.E. (2010). Global pollinator declines: trends impacts and drivers. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25(6) 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.01.007

  • Rasmont P. Franzén M. Lecocq T. Harpke A. Roberts S.P.M. Biesmeijer J.C. .... Schweiger O. (2015). Climatic Risk and Distribution Atlas of European Bumblebees. Biorisk 10(Special Issue).

  • Ruszkowski A. (1969a). Rośliny pokarmowe trzmiela parkowego – Bombus hypnorum (L.) i jego znaczenie gospodarcze. Pamiętnik Puławski 37 321–338.

  • Ruszkowski A. (1969b). Rośliny pokarmowe trzmiela leśnego – Bombus pratorum (L.) i jego znaczenie gospodarcze. Pamiętnik Puławski 37 339–354.

  • Ruszkowski A. (1969c). Rośliny pokarmowe trzmiela rudego – Bombus agrorum (L.) i jego znaczenie gospodarcze. Pamiętnik Puławski 37 385–408.

  • Ruszkowski A. (1971). Rośliny pokarmowe i znaczenie gospodarcze trzmiela ziemnego – Bombus terrestris (L.) i trzmiela gajowego – B. lucorum (L.) Pamiętnik Puławski 47 215–250.

  • Ruszkowski A. (1998a). Rośliny wskaźnikowe dla trzmieli (Bombus Latr.) krótkojęzyczkowych. Pszczelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe 1 321–332.

  • Ruszkowski A. (1998b). Rośliny wskaźnikowe dla trzmieli (Bombus Latr.) długo i średnio języczkowych. Pszczelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe 1 333–343.

  • Ruszkowski A. & Biliński M. (1970). Rośliny pokarmowe trzmiela kamiennika – Bombus lapidarius (L.) i jego znaczenie gospodarcze. Pamiętnik Puławski 37 43-60.

  • Ruszkowski A. & Żak B. (1969). Rośliny pokarmowe i znaczenie gospodarcze trzmieli z podrodzaju Hortorobombus Vogt. Pamiętnik Puławski 37 359–384.

  • Sikora A. & Kelm M. (2012). Flower preferences of the Wrocław Botanical Garden Bumblebees (Bombus spp.) Journal of Apicultural Science 56(2) 27–36. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10289-012-0021-y

  • Steven M. (1995). Blüten- und Nahrungsangebot des Botanischen Gartens in Münster und das saisonale Auftreten von Bienen (Apoidea). Retrieved July 10 2015 from http://www.nabu-naturschutzstation-muensterland.de/cms/upload/pdf/Diplomarbeit_Michael-Steven.pdf

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.804
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.007

CiteScore 2018: 0.98

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.362
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.645

Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 240 152 2
PDF Downloads 135 105 2