The relationship between internet addiction and personality traits in Slovak secondary schools students

Open access


A new phenomenon, which increasingly rises among the young generation all over the world, is Internet addiction. Information and communication technology (ICT) has a major influence not only on individual sectors of the national economy (services, industry, agriculture, etc.), but also on free time activities and interests of the young generation. ICT-related free time activities of the young generation have notably changed over the last decade (Slovakia was connected to the Internet in November 1992). The aim of the research was to determine the symptoms of Internet addiction in Slovak secondary school students, i.e. to detect significant differences between the following: a personality trait – addiction, addiction – age, addiction – a place of residence, etc. The standardized questionnaire was used in all regions of Slovakia. We collected data by means of an online questionnaire over the period of more than six months. The research results show that female have more potential to become addicted than male, which could be caused by feelings and sadness (Ha & Hwang., 2014). Some other significant results show that more extroverted students are less Internet-addicted than their less extroverted counterparts. According to Zamani, extroverts prefer social and face-to-face interaction with others (Zamani et al., 2011). Other questions focused on neuroticism - emotional stability, where more neurotic students were more addicted than less neurotic students. Finally, significant results were related to residence. Findings showed that students who come from cities (towns) had higher symptoms of Internet addiction than villagers. Other details of this research are shown in the results and discussion section.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • ALLISON P. D. 1999. Multiple Regression: a primer. Pine Forge Press: Thousand Oaks.


  • AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ADDICTION MEDICINE. 2011. Definition of Addiction http://www.asam.orgfor-the-public/definition-of-addiction

  • AMICHAI–HAMBURGER Y. 2002. Internet and personality. Computers in Human Behavior 18 1–10.

  • ANDREASSEN C.S. GRIFFITHS M.D. GJERTSEN S.R. KROSSBAKKEN E. KVAM S. PALLESEN S. (2013). The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 2(2) 90 – 99.

  • AUGNER C. HACKER G. W. 2012. Associations between problematic mobile phone use and psychological parameters in young adults. In: International Journal of Public Health 57 437 – 441.

  • BATIGÜN A.D. KILIC N. 2011. The relationships between internet addiction social support psychological symptoms and some socio-demographical variables. Türk Psikol Derg 26 (67) 1 – 10.

  • BOCIJ P. 2006. The dark side of the internet: protecting yourself and your family from online criminals. ISBN: 0-275-98757-X

  • CAMPOS J. A. ZUCOLOTO M. L. BONAFE F. S. JORDANI P. C. MAROCO J. 2011. Reliability and validity of self-reported burnout in college students: A cross randomized comparison of paper-and-pencil vs. online administration. In: Computers in Human Behavior 27 1875–1883.

  • COHEN J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • CORREA T. HINSLEY A. W. DE ZÚÑIGA H. G. 2010. Who interacts on the Web? The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. In: Computers in Human Behavior 26(2) 247-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.09.003

  • CHANG M.K. LAW S.P.M. 2008. Factor Structure for Young’s Internet Addiction Test: A confimatory study. Computers in Human Behavior. 24(6) 2597–2619.

  • ODACI H. ÇELIK Ç. B. 2013. Who are problematic internet users? An investigation of the correlations between problematic internet use and shyness loneliness narcissism aggression and selfperception. Computers in Human Behavior 29(6) 2382–2387.

  • CHOU C. CONDRON L. BELLAND J.C.. 2005. A review of the research on Internet addiction. Educational Psychology Review 17(4) 363–88.

  • De COCK R. VANGEEL J. KLEIN A. MINOTTE P. ROSAS O. MEERKERK G.J. 2014. Compulsive use of social networking sites in Belgium: prevalence profile and the role of attitude toward work and school. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking 17(3) 166–171.

  • DEMKANIN P. 2008. One small but significant step in science education in Slovakia. In P. Demkanin B. Kibble J. Lavonen J. G. Mas & J. Turlo Eds. Effective use of ICT in science education. 120–140. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh School of Education.

  • DOUGLAS A.C. MILLS J.E. NIANG M. STEPCHENKOVA S. BYUN S. RUFF;INI C. et al. 2008. Internet addiction: meta-synthesis of qualitative research for the decade 1996-2006. Computers in Human Behavior. 24(6) 302–744.

  • DURAK M. SENOL-DURAK E. 2010. Which personality traits are associated with cognitions related to problematic Internet use? Manuscript under evaluation.

  • FANČOVIČOVÁ J. PROKOP P. 2008. Students’ attitudes toward computer use in Slovakia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science & Technology Education 4(3) 255 – 262.

  • FERRARO G. CACI B. D’AMICO A. BLASI M. D. 2007. Internet addiction disorder: An Italian study. In: CyberPsychology & Behavior 10(2) 170–175.

  • FLOROS G. SIOMOS K. 2014. Excessive internet use and personality traits. In: Curr Behav Neurosci Reports 1 19–26.

  • FOX S. RAINIE L. LARSEN E. HORRIGAN J. LENHART A. SPOONER T. CARTER C. 2001. Wired Seniors. The Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved May 4th 2005 from:

  • GHASSEMZADEH L. SHAHRARAY M. MORADI A. 2008. Prevalence of Internet addiction and comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Iranian high schools. In: CyberPsychology & Behavior 11(6) 731–733.

  • GORSUCH R. L. 1983. Factor Analysis second edition Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • GRIFFITHS M. D. 1996. Gambling on the Internet: A brief note. In: Journal of Gambling Studies 12 471–473.

  • GRIFFITHS M.D. HUNT N. 1998. Dependence on computer games by adolescents. In: Psychology Reports 82 475–480.

  • HA Y. M. HWANG W. J. 2014. Gender Differences in Internet Addiction Associated with Psychological Health Indicators Among Adolescents Using a National Web-based Survey. In: International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 12 (5) 660.

  • HAWI N. S. 2012. Internet addiction among adolescents in Lebanon. In: Computers in Human Behavior 28(3): 1044–1053.

  • HIRZALLA F. VAN ZOONEN L. 2008. Usesofthe Web for Civic Participation: výskumná správa. London: Institute of Education. 140 pages.

  • HORRIGAN J. RAINIE L. 2006. The internet’s growing in life’s major moments. Retrieved August 30 http://www/

  • HOSŤOVECKÝ M. ZAŤKOVÁ T. 2010. Options for implementing videoconferencing system in a combined form of education. In: Acta Universitatis Facultatis Paedagogicae Tyrnaviensis. Ser. C – Trnava 157-164.

  • KALKAN M. 2012. Predictiveness of interpersonal cognitive distortions on university students’ problematic internet use. In: Children and Youth Services Review 3(7) 1305–1308.

  • KEDEM C. 1999. The social impact of the internet on our society. Retrieved August 30 2006

  • KO CH. YEN J.Y. YEN C.F. LIN H.C. YANG M.J. 2007. Factors predictive for incidence and remission of Internet addiction in young adolescents: A prospective study. In: CyberPsychology & Behavior. 10 545-551.

  • KO CH. YEN J.Y. YEN C.F. CHEN C.S. CHEN C.C. 2012. The association between Internet addiction and psychiatric disorder: a review of the literature. In: Eur Psychiatry. 27(1) 1-8.

  • KRAUT R. PATTERSON M. LUNDMARK V. KIESLER S. MUKOPHADHYAY T. SCHERLIS W. 1998. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? In: American Psychologist 53(9) 1017-1031.

  • KUNIMURA M. THOMAS V. 2000. Summary and review of the NEO-PI-R personality test. Journal of LoyolaMary mount University. 2000;38(4):1–13

  • LANDERS R. N. LOUNSBURY J. W. 2006. An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage. In: Computers in Human Behavior 22 283–293. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.001.

  • LEWIS I. WATSON B. WHITE K. M. 2009. Internet versus paper-and-pencil survey methods in psychological experiments: Equivalence testing of participant responses to health-related messages. In: Australian Journal of Psychology 61 107–116.

  • LIĆWINKO J. KRAJEWSKA-KUŁAK E. & ŁUKASZUK C. 2011. Internet addiction among academic youth in Białystok. Progress in Health Sciences 1(1) 124-130.

  • LOCKE S. D. GILBERT B. O. 1995. Method of psychological assessment self-disclosure and experiential differences: A study of computer questionnaire and interview assessment formats. In: Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10 255–263.

  • MATTHEWS G. DEARY I. J. WHITEMAN M. C. 2009. Personality traits (3rd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. In Internet addiction in adolescents: Prevalence and risk factors. In: Computer in Human Behavior.

  • MIŠÚT M. PRIBILOVÁ K. 2013: Communication impact on project oriented teaching in technology supported education. In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 152 LNEE 559-567.

  • MONTAG C. JURKIEWICZ M. REUTER M. 2010. Low self-directedness is a better predictor for problematic internet use than high neuroticism. In: Computers in Human Behavior 26(6) 1531–1535. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.021

  • MUSCH J. BRODER A. KLAUER K. C. 2001. Improving survey research on the world-wide web using the randomized response technique. In U-D. Reips and M. Bosnjak (Ed.) Dimensions of internet science (179–192). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

  • OZCAN N.K. BUZLU S. 2007. Internet use and its relation with the psychosocial situation for a sample of university students. In: Cyberpsychology and Behavior 10(6) 767–772.

  • ORZACK M. 1999. Computer addiction: Is it real or virtual? Harvard Mental Health Letter 15(7) 8.

  • PODSAKOFF P. M. MACKENZIE S. Lee J.Y. Podsakoff P. N. 2003. Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies. In: The Journal of applied psychology 88(5). 879–903. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

  • VAN GELDER M. BRETVELD R. W. ROELEVELD N. 2010. Web-based questionnaires: The future in epidemiology? Internet versus paper-and-pencil survey methods in psychological experiments: Equivalence testing of participant responses to health-related messages. In: American Journal of Epidemiology 172 1292–1298.

  • RAMMSTEDT B. JOHN O. P. 2007. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. In: Journal of Research in Personality. 41 203-212. ISSN: 0092-6566.

  • RICE L. & MARKEY P. M. 2009. The role of extraversion and neuroticism in influencing anxiety following computer-mediated interactions. In: Personality and Individual Differences 46 (1) 35-39.

  • RYAN T. XENOS S. 2011. ‘Who uses Facebook? An investigation into the relationship between the Big Five shyness narcissism loneliness and Facebook usage’ In: Computers in Human Behavior 27 (5) 1658-1664.

  • SAINI V. K. BANIYA G. CH. VERMA K. K. SONI A. KESHAWANI S. 2016. A study on relationship of internet addictive behavior with personality traits among medical students. In: Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour 21(2) 108–111.

  • SIOMOS K. E. DAFOULI E. D. BRAIMIOTIS D. A. MOUZAS O. D. & ANGELOPOULOS N. V. 2008. Internet addiction among Greek adolescent students. In: CyberPsychology & Behavior 11 (6) 653–657.

  • SLOVAK REPUBLIC. 2017. Law no. 369/1990 § 22 “The Law about General Settlement”

  • STEPANIKOVA I. Nie N. H. & He X. 2010. Time on the Internet at home loneliness and life satisfaction: Evidence from panel time-diary data. Computers in Human Behavior 26(3) 329-338.

  • TAKESHI S. 2006. Internet Addiction among Students: Prelevance and psychological problems in Japan. In JMAJ 49 (7-8). 279-283.

  • VRABEC N. 2009. On-line generácia: informácie komunikácia a digitálna participácia mládeže v informačnej spoločnosti: výskumná správa. Bratislava: MŠ SR a IUVENTA. 59 s.

  • WEST R. 2013. Models of addiction. In EMCDDA Insights [online]. No. 14 161p. ISSN 2314-9264.

  • UYENCO B. KINGDON A. 2010. Young Adults Revealed: The lives and motivations of 21st century youth

  • YOUNG K. S. 1996. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. In: Cyber Psychology and Behavior. 237-244. ISSN 1094-9313.

  • YOUNG K. 1998. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. In: CyberPsychology and Behavior 1 237-244.

  • YOUNG K. ROGERS R. C. 1998. The Relationship between depression and Internet Addiction. In: CyberPsychology & Behavior 1(1): 25-28.

  • YANG S. & TUNG C. 2007. Comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese high school. In: Computers in Human Behavior 23 79–96.

  • TOSUN N. – BARIS M. F. 2011. The Place and Importance of Computer and Internet’s In Secondary School Students’ Life. In: Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 28 530 – 535.

  • TSAI C. C. & LIN C.C. 2004. Taiwanese adolescents’ perceptions and attitudes regarding the Internet: Exploring gender differences. In: Adolescence 39 725-734.

  • TSAI H. F. CHENG S. H. YEH T. L. SHIH C. C. CHEN K. C. YANG Y. C. YANG Y. K. 2009. The risk factors of internet addiction—A survey of university freshmen. In: Psychiatry Research 167 294-299.

  • ZAMANI B. E. ABEDINI Y. KHERADMAND A. 2011. Internet Addiction Based on Personality Characteristics of High School Students in Kerman Iran. In: Addict Health. Summer-Autumn; 3(3-4) 85–91.

Impact Factor

Mathematical Citation Quotient (MCQ) 2018: 0.06


researchers in the fields of informatics, information technologies, statistics and mathematics

Gesamte Zeit Letztes Jahr Letzte 30 Tage
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 1133 766 72
PDF Downloads 720 449 63