An Environment for Collective Perception based on Fuzzy and Semantic Approaches

Open access

Abstract

This work proposes a software environment implementing a methodology for acquiring and exploiting the collective perception (CP) of Points of Interests (POIs) in a Smart City, which is meant to support decision makers in urban planning and management. This environment relies upon semantic knowledge discovery techniques and fuzzy computational approaches, including natural language processing, sentiment analysis, POI signatures and Fuzzy Cognitive Maps, turning them into a cohesive architectural blend in order to effectively gather the realistic perception of a user community towards given areas and attractions of a Smart City. The environment has been put to the test via a thorough experimentation against a massive user base of an online community with respect to a large metropolitan city (the City of Naples). Such an experimentation yielded consistent results, useful for providing decision makers with a clear awareness of the positive as well as critical aspects of urban areas, and thus helping them shape the measures to be taken for an improved city management and development.

[1] F. Antunes and J. Costa, Integrating decision support and social networks, Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2012, no. 574276, 2012.

[2] Smarter Cities - New cognitive approaches to long-standing challenges, http://www.ibm.com/smarterplanet/us/en/smarter_cities/overview/, accessed: 2017-02-10.

[3] D. Doran, K. Severin, S. Gokhale, and A. Dagnino, Social media enabled human sensing for smart cities, AI Communications, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 57–75, 2016.

[4] G. P. Hancke, G. P. Hancke Jr et al., The role of advanced sensing in smart cities, Sensors, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 393–425, 2012.

[5] G. R. Ceballos and V. M. Larios, A model to promote citizen driven government in a smart city: Use case at gdl smart city, in 2016 IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2), pp. 1–6, 2016.

[6] P. Zeile, B. Resch, L. Dörrzapf, J.-P. Exner, G. Sagl, A. Summa, and M. Sudmanns, Urban emotions–tools of integrating people perception into urban planning, in REAL CORP 2015. PLAN TOGETHER–RIGHT NOW–OVERALL. From Vision to Reality for Vibrant Cities and Regions. Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Urban Planning, Regional Development and Information Society. CORP–Competence Center of Urban and Regional Planning, pp. 905–912, 2015.

[7] A. Vakali, D. Chatzakou, V. A. Koutsonikola, and G. Andreadis, Social data sentiment analysis in smart environments-extending dual polarities for crowd pulse capturing. in DATA, pp. 175–182, 2013.

[8] D. Toti and M. Rinelli, On the road to speed-reading and fast learning with CONCEPTUM, in Proceedings - 2016 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, IEEE INCoS 2016, pp. 1–6, 2016.

[9] S. Baccianella, A. Esuli, and F. Sebastiani, Senti- WordNet 3.0: An Enhanced Lexical Resource for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, in Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10). Valletta, Malta: European Language Resources Association (ELRA), 2010.

[10] G. D’Aniello, A. Gaeta, M. Gaeta, V. Loia, and M. Reformat, Collective awareness in Smart City with Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and Fuzzy sets, in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), 2016.

[11] R. R. Yager and M. Z. Reformat, Looking for likeminded individuals in social networks using tagging and e fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 672–687, 2013.

[12] B. Kosko, Fuzzy cognitive maps, International journal of man-machine studies, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 65–75, 1986.

[13] G. D’Aniello, V. Loia, and F. Orciuoli, A multiagent fuzzy consensus model in a situation awareness framework, Applied Soft Computing, vol. 30, pp. 430 – 440, 2015.

[14] M. Olazabal and U. Pascual, Use of fuzzy cognitive maps to study urban resilience and transformation, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 2015.

[15] U. Özesmi and S. L. Özesmi, Ecological models based on peoples knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach, Ecological Modelling, vol. 176, no. 1, pp. 43–64, 2004.

[16] F. Habib and A. Shokoohi, Classification and resolving urban problems by means of fuzzy approach, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 36, pp. 894–901, 2009.

[17] D. Toti, AQUEOS: A system for question answering over semantic data, in Proceedings - 2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, IEEE INCoS 2014, pp. 716–719, 2014.

[18] D. Milne and I. H. Witten, An open-source toolkit for mining wikipedia, Artif. Intell., vol. 194, pp. 222–239, Jan. 2013. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.06.007

[19] N. Capuano, C. De Maio, S. Salerno, and D. Toti, A methodology based on commonsense knowledge and ontologies for the automatic classification of legal cases, in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2014.

[20] N. Capuano, A. Longhi, S. Salerno, and D. Toti, Ontology-driven generation of training paths in the legal domain, International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 14–22, 2015.

[21] V. Basile and M. Nissim, Sentiment analysis on Italian tweets, in Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis. Atlanta, Georgia: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 100–107, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W13-1614

[22] R. R. Yager, On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking, Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 183–190, 1988.

[23] T.-A. Shiau and J.-S. Liu, Developing an indicator system for local governments to evaluate transport sustainability strategies, Ecological Indicators, vol. 34, pp. 361 – 371, 2013.

Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research

The Journal of Polish Neural Network Society, the University of Social Sciences in Lodz & Czestochowa University of Technology

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 5.00

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.492
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 2.813

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 206 206 20
PDF Downloads 99 99 11