Using Different Mapping Function In GPS Processing For Remote Sensing The Atmosphere

Open access


Due to development of GPS technology and by using the combination LC of L1 and L2 frequency the first order effect of the ionosphere tends to be canceled. Thus the main source of errors in the atmosphere which causes the delay in GPS signal is the neutral part of the atmosphere, usually referred to tropospheric delay. In general, the delay is computed at the zenith direction and it is referred to zenith tropospheric delay. The zenith tropospheric delay consist of two parts: zenith hydrostatic delay and zenith wet delay. The zenith hydrostatic delay can be very well modeled which accounts for nearly 90% to 100% of the atmospheric delay. The zenith wet delay is due to the water vapor and represents the “harder” part that need to be modeled caused by “unmixed” condition of the wet atmosphere. The influence of the zenith wet delay is around 0-40 cm. The aim of the article is to present the results obtain on the network of three station which were spread around the Oradea city using different types of mapping functions. The mapping functions are: global pressure and temperature – GPT2 and Vienna mapping function – VMF1. For the vertical studies to obtain the highest accuracy, the recommended mapping function is VMF1.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bevis Michael Steven Businger Steven Chiswell Thomas A Herring Richard A Anthes Christian Rocken and Randolph H Ware. 1994. “GPS Meteorology: Mapping Zenith Wet Delays onto Precipitable Water.” Journal of Applied Meteorology 33 (3): 379–86.

  • Boehm Johannes Birgit Werl and Harald Schuh. 2006. “Troposphere Mapping Functions for GPS and Very Long Baseline Interferometry from European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Operational Analysis Data.” Journal of Geophysical Research 111 (B2): B02406. doi:10.1029/2005JB003629.

  • Bosy J J Kaplon W Rohm J Sierny and T Hadas. 2012. “Near Real-Time Estimation of Water Vapour in the Troposphere Using Ground GNSS and the Meteorological Data.” In Annales Geophysicae 30:1379–91. Copernicus GmbH.

  • Dousa Jan and Gemma V. Bennitt. 2012. “Estimation and Evaluation of Hourly Updated Global GPS Zenith Total Delays over Ten Months.” GPS Solutions 17 (4): 453–64. doi:10.1007/s10291-012-0291-7.

  • Duan Jingping Michael Bevis Peng Fang Yehuda Bock Steven Chiswell Steven Businger Christian Rocken Frederick Solheim Terasa van Hove and Randolph Ware.

  • 1996. “GPS Meteorology: Direct Estimation of the Absolute Value of Precipitable Water.” Journal of Applied Meteorology 35 (6): 830–38.

  • Herring T A R W King and S C McClusky. 2008. “Introduction to Gamit/Globk.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge.

  • Hobiger T J Boehm and R Ichikawa. 2012. “Troposphere Delay Modeling-Status Quo and Future Trends.” In AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts 1:5.

  • Katsougiannopoulos S C Pikridas D Rossikopoulos I Ifadis and A Fotiou. 2006. “Tropospheric Refraction Estimation Using Various Models Radiosonde Measurements and Permanent GPS Data.” PS5. 4–GNSS Processing and Applications 15.

  • Kuo Y-H W S Schreiner J Wang D L Rossiter and Y Zhang. 2005. “Comparison of GPS Radio Occultation Soundings with Radiosondes.” Geophysical Research Letters 32 (5). Wiley Online Library.

  • Lagler Klemens Michael Schindelegger Johannes Böhm Hana Krásná and Tobias Nilsson. 2013. “GPT2: Empirical Slant Delay Model for Radio Space Geodetic Techniques.” Geophysical Research Letters 40 (6). Wiley Online Library: 1069–73.

  • Liou Yuei-An Cheng-Yung Huang and Yu-Tun Teng. 2014. “Precipitable Water Observed by Ground-Based GPS Receivers and Microwave Radiometry.” Earth Planets and Space 52 (6): 445–50. doi:10.1186/BF03352256.

  • Nilsson Tobias Johannes Böhm DudyD. Wijaya Ana Tresch Vahab Nafisi and Harald Schuh. 2013. “Path Delays in the Neutral Atmosphere.” In Atmospheric Effects in Space Geodesy SE - 3 edited by Johannes Böhm and Harald Schuh 73–136. Springer Atmospheric Sciences. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36932-2_3.

  • Nistor S and A S Buda. 2015. “Scheduling And Simulation Of VLBI Measuremets For The Determination Of Earth Orientation Parameters.” Journal of Applied Engineering Sciences 5 (1): 61–68.

  • Nistor Sorin and Aurelian Stelian Buda. 2015. “Ambiguity Resolution in Precise Point Positioning Technique: A Case Study.” Journal of Applied Engineering Science.

  • Ohtani Ryu and Isao Naito. 2000. “Comparisons of GPS-derived Precipitable Water Vapors with Radiosonde Observations in Japan.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012) 105 (D22). Wiley Online Library: 26917–29.

  • Tregoning Paul Reinout Boers Denis O’Brien and Martin Hendy. 1998. “Accuracy of Absolute Precipitable Water Vapor Estimates from GPS Observations.” Journal of Geophysical Research 103 (D22): 28701. doi:10.1029/98JD02516.

  • Van Baelen Joël Jean-Pierre Aubagnac and Alain Dabas. 2005. “Comparison of near-Real Time Estimates of Integrated Water Vapor Derived with GPS Radiosondes and Microwave Radiometer.” Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 22 (2): 201–10.

  • Wang Junhong Liangying Zhang and Aiguo Dai. 2005. “Global Estimates of Water-vapor-weighted Mean Temperature of the Atmosphere for GPS Applications.” Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984–2012) 110 (D21). Wiley Online Library.

  • Yu Kegen Chris Rizos Derek Burrage Andrew G Dempster Kefei Zhang and Markus Markgraf. 2014. “An Overview of GNSS Remote Sensing.” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing 2014 (1): 134. doi:10.1186/1687-6180-2014-134.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 327 209 12
PDF Downloads 147 106 9