Mapping of Academic Production on Social Enterprises: An international analysis for the growth of this field

Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify, organize and analyze the international scientific production on social enterprises (SE). It presents the results of a bibliometric study combined with a systematic literature analysis. We analyzed 204 academic articles on the subject, from four different sources: (i) articles published in journals with high impact factors; (ii) most cited articles as per Google Scholar; (iii) articles addressing topics related to SE; and (iv) articles from the Social Enterprise Journal, specialized in the subject. Results point to remarkable recent growth in the field of SE, both theoretically and empirically. In addition, this study presents the main pieces of work, countries, institutions, research questions, methodology and results found in the SE literature. Studies have concentrated around six main categories: (1) understanding SE, through different approaches, concepts and models; (2) governance and relationships with stakeholders; (3) attempts to increase practical references and samples within the field; (4) organizational learning, structure and critical factors for success and failure of SE; (5) metrics, indicators and social impact generated by SE; and (6) legislation of different countries and how it relates to SE.

Alvarado, R. U. (2007). A bibliometria: história, legitimação e estrutura. Para entender a ciência da informação. Salvador: EDUFBA, 185-217.

Araújo, C. A. (2007). Bibliometria: evolução histórica e questões atuais. Em questão, 12 (1), 11-32.

Barki, E., Comini, G., Cunliffe, A., Hart, S., & Rai, S. (2015). Social entrepreneurship and social business: Retrospective and prospective research. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55 (4), 380-384.

Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A. C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58 (6), 1-57.

Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing–Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8 (1), 397-441.

Billis, D. (2010). Towards a theory of hybrid organizations. In Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy, edited by David Billis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 46-69.

Borzaga, C., Depedri, S., & Galera, G. (2012). Interpreting social enterprises. Revista de Administração, 47 (3), 398-409.

Brower, H. H. (2011). Sustainable development through service learning: A pedagogical framework and case example in a third world context. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 10 (1), 58-76.

Bugg-Levine, A., Kogut, B., & Kulatilaka, N. (2012). A new approach to funding social enterprises. Harvard Business Review, 90 (1/2), 118-123.

Chan, K. T., Kuan, Y. Y., & Wang, S. T. (2011). Similarities and divergences: comparison of social enterprises in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Social Enterprise Journal, 7 (1), 33-49.

Dees, G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76, 54-69.

Defourny, J., & Kim, S. Y. (2011). Emerging models of social enterprise in Eastern Asia: a cross-country analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 7 (1), 86-111.

De Solla Price, D. J. (1986). Little science, big science... and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.

Doherty, B., Haugh, H., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 16 (4), 417-436.

Galera, G., & Borzaga, C. (2009). Social enterprise: An international overview of its conceptual evolution and legal implementation. Social Enterprise Journal, 5 (3), 210-228.

Guedes, V. L., & Borschiver, S. (2005). Bibliometria: uma ferramenta estatística para a gestão da informação e do conhecimento, em sistemas de informação, de comunicação e de avaliação científica e tecnológica. Encontro Nacional de Ciência da Informação, 6 (1), 1-18.

Granados, M. L., Hlupic, V., Coakes, E., & Mohamed, S. (2011). Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship research and theory: A bibliometric analysis from 1991 to 2010. Social Enterprise Journal, 7 (3), 198-218.

Grassl, W. (2012). Business models of social enterprise: A design approach to hybridity. ACRN Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives, 1 (1), 37-60.

Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., Vogus, T. J., & Miller, T. L. (2013). Studying the origins of social entrepreneurship: compassion and the role of embedded agency. Academy of Management Review, 38 (3), 460-463.

Gupta, S., Beninger, S., & Ganesh, J. (2015). A hybrid approach to innovation by social enterprises: lessons from Africa. Social Enterprise Journal, 11 (1), 89-112.

Halme, M., Lindeman, S., & Linna, P. (2012). Innovation for inclusive business: Intrapreneurial bricolage in multinational corporations. Journal of Management Studies, 49 (4), 743-784.

Holt, D. (2011). Where are they now? Tracking the longitudinal evolution of environmental businesses from the 1990s. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20 (4), 238-250.

Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration?. Research Policy, 26 (1), 1-18.

Iizuka, E. S., Walchhutter, S., Romani-Dias, M., & Barbosa, A. D. S. (2014). Empreendedorismo Social e Negócios Sociais: Revisão Crítica e Agenda de Pesquisa. SEMEAD FEA-USP.

Iizuka, E. S., Varela, C. A., & Larroudé, E. R. A. (2015). Social business dilemmas in Brazil: Rede Asta case. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55 (4), 385-396.

Kickul, J., & Thomas S. L. (2015). Financing social enterprises. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5 (2), 83-85.

Lima, T. C., & Mioto, R. C. (2007). Procedimentos metodológicos na construção do conhecimento científico: a pesquisa bibliográfica. Revista Katálysis, 10 (1), 37-45.

Lyons, T. S., & Kickul, J. (2013).The social enterprise financing landscape: The lay of the land and new research on the horizon. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 3 (2), 147-159.

McLoughlin, J., Kaminski, J., Sodagar, B., Khan, S., Harris, R., Arnaudo, G., & Mc Brearty, S. (2009). A strategic approach to social impact measurement of social enterprises: The SIMPLE methodology. Social Enterprise Journal, 5 (2), 154-178.

Newth, J. (2016). Social enterprise innovation in context: Stakeholder influence through contestation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6 (4), 369-399.

O’Shaughnessy, M. (2008). Statutory support and the implications for the employee profile of rural based Irish work integration social enterprises (WISEs). Social Enterprise Journal, 4 (2), 126-135.

Pache, A. C., and Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56 (4), 972-1001.

Plaskoff, J. (2012). Building the heart and the mind: An interview with leading social entrepreneur Sarah Harris. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11 (3), 432-441.

Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80 (9), 48-59.

Prahalad, C. K. (2006). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Pearson Education India.

Richardson, R. (1999). Pesquisa social: métodos e técnicas. São Paulo: Atlas.

Roman-Calderon, J. P., Odoardi, C., & Battistelli, A. (2015). Cause-Fit, Positive Attitudes And Behaviors Within Hybrid Colombian Organizations. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 55 (4), 408-417.

Rosolen, T., Tiscoski, G. P., & Comini, G. M. (2014). Empreendedorismo social e negócios sociais: Um estudo bibliométrico da produção nacional e internacional. Revista Interdisciplinar de Gestão Social, 3(1).

Saes, S. (2000). Estudo bibliométrico das publicações em economia da saúde no Brasil, 1989-1998. Diss., University of São Paulo.

Sassmannshausen, S. P., & Volkmann, C. (2013). A bibliometric based review on social entrepreneurship and its establishment as a field of research (No. 2013-003). Schumpeter Discussion Papers.

Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford: Paperbacks.

Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing socialbusiness tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23 (03), 407-442.

Snaith, I. (2007). Recent reforms to corporate legal structures for social enterprise in the UK: opportunity or confusion? Social Enterprise Journal, 3 (1), 20-30.

Tandon, A. (2014). Investigating learning in social enterprises: a boundary perspective. Social Enterprise Journal, 10 (2), 155-172.

Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22 (1), 60-80.

Trexler, J. (2008). Social Entrepreneurship as Algorithm: Is Social Enterprise Sustainable? E: CO Issue, 10 (3), 65-85.

Van Hulle, C., & Dewaelheyns, N. (2014). Why do private non-profit organizations provide information on the Internet? Social Enterprise Journal, 10 (1), 69-86.

Williams, C. C., & Nadin, S. (2011). Beyond the commercial versus social entrepreneurship divide: Some lessons from English localities. Social Enterprise Journal, 7 (2), 118-129.

Winkler, C. & Schulman S. A. (2012). Social Business: An Emerging Entrepreneurship Research Focus. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 2 (4).

Wood Jr, T. (2010). Organizações híbridas. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 50 (2), 241-247.

Yu, X. (2013). The governance of social enterprises in China. Social Enterprise Journal, 9 (3), 225-246.

Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: Lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Planning, 43 (2), 308-325.

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 131 131 34
PDF Downloads 85 86 20