Student assessment of professors emerged in the context of university democratization and increasing involvement of students in the management of the higher education institutions. It was institutionalized mainly as an instrument to gradually improve the quality of teaching, and only rarely used as an element determining the hiring and firing of the academic staff. In Romania, it came to the forefront only in the context of the Revolution of December 1989, when students started to question the competence of their professors and asked for the removal of those whom they considered unfit. The article focuses on the concrete case of the “black list” issued by the history students in the University of Bucharest, and on the way this revolutionary challenge shaped the institutional governance and the further development of the Faculty of History. The analysis refutes attempts to consider this episode as a politically-motivated purge and to integrate it in the master-narrative of post-communist lustration. While highlighting the particularities of this case, which allowed to professionally-motivated students to initiate a major reshuffle in the functioning of a higher education institution, the authors argue that such a synthetical evaluation pattern may in fact be one of the not so uncommon ‘revolutionary’ paths towards establishing a regulated system of student assessment of professors.
(AFIUB) Arhiva Facultatii de Istorie, Universitatea din Bucuresti, Fond Decanat.
Altbach, PG (2006) ‘Student Politics: Activism and Culture’ in Altbach PG and Forest JJF (eds.), International Handbook of Higher Education, Springer International Publishing, pp. 329–345.
Andreiță Ion (1990) ‘Clio în impas’, România liberă, XLVIII, no.14161 (May 24): 2.
Bădescu Cezar-Paul and Șincai Anca (1995) ‘Despre colindatul studențesc din 24-25 decembrie 1968’ (Anca Șincai about the Student Carolling at 24-25 December 1968), Revista 22, 51: 6.
Boia L. (1997) Istorie și mit în conștiința românească. București: Humanitas.
Budrigă Vasile (1991) ‘Este România de azi, cu adevărat, un stat democratic, de drept?’, Europa, 2 (27): 3.
Burakowski Adam (2016) Dictatura lui Nicolae Ceaușescu (1965-1989). Geniul Carpaților, Iași: Polirom, p. 133. Notă cu privire la manifestația studenților din București 24.12.68 (Potrivit informațiilor din mediul universitar, pe marginea ședinței activului de partid din conducerea universităților în urma evenimentelor), D-I-R-0-24-69, A MSZ RP, pp1-4.
Ciachir N. (2001) Un istoric român ancorat în lumea contemporană, vol. 1, Bucuresti, Editura Oscar Print.
Cioflâncă, Adrian (2006) ‘Repere Pentru O Istorie a Uniunii Tineretului Comunist’, Anuarul Institutului de Istorie „A. D. Xenopol”, XLIII–XLIV: 527–48.
Elster Jon (1998) ‘Coming to Terms with the Past. A Framework for the Study of Justice’ in the Transition to Democracy, Arch. Europ.sociol., 39, p. 7-48;
Grosescu Raluca and Ursachi Raluca (2009) Justiţia penală de tranziţie. De la Nürnberg la postcomunismul românesc, Iaşi, Polirom; Stan Lavinia (2009) Transitional justice in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union: reckoning with the communist past, Routledge.
Interview 1 – former History Faculty Student in 1989-1990.
Ioniță Gh. (2007) O viață, un destin. Istorii știute și neștiute, București, Cartea Universitară.
Iscru Gh. D. (1995a) Formarea națiunii române. București: Editura „Nicolae Bălcescu”.
Iscru, Gh. D. (1995b) Geto-dacii, națiunea-matcă din spațiul carpatodanubo-balcanic. București: Editura „Nicolae Bălcescu”.
Iscru, Gh. D. (1997) Națiune, nationalism, românism. București: Editura „Nicolae Bălcescu”.
Ivan, Richard (2009) ‘Youth Movements: Travel, Protest, and Europe in 1968’ in Jobs Am Hist Rev 114 (2): 376-404.
Klemenčič M (2012) ‘Student representation in Western Europe: introduction to the special issue’, European Journal of Higher Education 2 (1): 2–19.
Kritz N. (ed.) TransitionalJustice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1995, vol. 3, p. 293.; McAdams J. A. (ed.) Transitional Justice and the Rule of Law in New Democracies, South Bend: University of Notre Dame, 1997, pp. 193–196.
League of Students Manifesto / Programme – UB, December 29, 1989, Arhiva personală Bogdan Antoniu.
Mihăilescu Ioan and Rostas Zoltan (2007) Dialog neterminat, Bucuresti: Curtea Veche.
Miller, A. H. (1988) ‘Student assessment of teaching in higher education’, Higher Education, 17 (3): 3-15.
Murgescu B. (2000) A fi istoric în anul 2000, Bucureşti, ALL Educaţional.
Murgescu B. (2003) ‘The Romanian Historiography in the 1990’s’, Romanian Journal of Political Science, 3 (1): 30-59.
Murgescu B. and Bozgan O. (2014) (eds.) Universitatea din București 1964-2014, București, Editura Universității din București.
Ory, J. C. (2000) Teaching Evaluation: Past, Present, and Future in New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (83) p 13–18.
Ory, J. C. (2001) Faculty Thoughts and Concerns About Student Ratings in New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (87) p: 4.
Pop I. A. (2002) Istoria, adevărul și miturile (note de lectură). București: Editura Enciclopedică.
Rotaru M. (2014) ‘Job Assignment of Graduates of the University of Bucharest and Their Integration with the Labor System of the 1980s’, International Review of Social Research, 4 (2): 159-168.
Rüegg W. and Sadlak J (2011) ‘Relations with authority’ in Rüegg W (ed) A History of the University in Europe. Volume 4. Universities since 1945, Cambridge University Press.