Analysing social networks in rural development: a gender approach


Gender issues are of growing importance in the European and Spanish rural areas. The literature reflects that women have traditionally been linked to marginal positions in economic life, social activities and even political representation at the local level. Local development programs that have been implemented in Europe’s rural areas have had among its objectives the improvement of the articulation of local communities. To reach them, it has been fostered, among others, a gender perspective, promoting both productive activities led by women and their participation as stakeholders in the management and decision-making structures of such programmes. In this paper, we addressed this latter issue. The study focuses on a sample of 30 relevant social actors linked to the implementation of a rural development programme in the county of Rincón de Ademuz (Valencia, Spain) from the mid-1990s to recent date. Through Social Network Analysis, gender differences and women’s roles within the social network are studied in two differentiated periods. This analysis reveals that despite women representing a minority among the relevant stakeholders, their level of participation, prestige, position in the network, and frequency of relationships, among other indicators, are comparable with respect to those sustained by men. Therefore, it cannot be said, as reflected in some of the literature, that women tend to occupy marginal positions in the structure of social relations of local development programs.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Advisory Group on Women in Rural Areas (2014) Gender equality in the 2014-2020 programming period. Available at (Accessed 20th of February, 2016).

  • André, I. (2013) ‘Gender and Social Innovation: The Role of EU Policies’, in F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood and A. Hamdouch (eds.), The international handbook on social innovation, collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 412-423.

  • Borgatti, S., Everett, M. and Freeman, L. (2002) Ucinet for Windows Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.

  • Buciega, A. and Esparcia, J. (2013) ‘Desarrollo, Territorio y Capital Social. Un Análisis a partir de Dinámicas Relacionales en el Desarrollo Rural’. REDES – Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, Vol. 24 (1), pp. 81-113.

  • Burt, R. (2005) Brokerage and Closure. An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

  • Camarero, L. y Sampedro, R. (2008) ‘¿Por qué se van las mujeres? El continuum de movilidad como hipótesis explicativa de la masculinización rural’. In Revista Española de investigaciones Sociológicas (REIS), Nº 124, 73-105 pp.

  • Chiritescu, V., Ruxandra, A.D., Mihaela, K. (2015) ‘The role of youth in sustainable development of Romanian rural communities’. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 10 (2), pp. 183-196.

  • Chung, K., Hossain, L. and Davis, J. (2005) Exploring Sociocentric and Egocentric Approaches for Social Network Analysis. International Conference on Knowledge Management in Asia Pacific, Wellington, New Zeeland, November 27-29. 8 p. Available in (Accessed 20th of December, 2015).

  • Council of Europe (2011) Rural Women in Europe. Resolution 1806. Available at (Accessed 20th of February, 2016).

  • Doreian, P., Batagelj, V. and Ferligoj, A. (2005) ‘Positional analysis of Sociometric Data’, in Carrington, P., Scott, J. and Wasserman, S. (eds) Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press, pp. 77-97.

  • Esparcia, J. (2000) ‘The LEADER programme and the Rise of Rural Development in Spain’. Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (2), pp. 200-207.

  • Esparcia, J. (2011a): ‘The Local Action Groups in the LEADER Programme in Spain’, in National Rural Network (2011): LEADER in Spain (1991-2011). An Active Contribution to Rural Development. Ministry of Environment and Rural and Marine Affairs, pp. 97-124, 285-287 [in Spanish]. In

  • Esparcia, J. (2011b): ‘The value of education as an element of change in rural areas’. Closing conference at the Fourth Meeting of Local Entities: Education in Rural Areas. Medina del Campo, Valladolid (Spain), 26th October [in Spanish]. In (Accessed 15th of March, 2016).

  • Esparcia, J. and Escribano, J (2014): ‘Relational social capital in rural areas: a study from Social Network Analysis’. In Cortizo, J., Redondo, J.M. and Sánchez, M.J. (Eds.) From Rural Geography to Local Development. University of León, pp. 215-230 [in Spanish]. Available at

  • Esparcia, J., Escribano, J., Buciega, A. (2015) ‘A perspective of LEADER method in Spain based on the analysis of local action groups’. In: Granberg, L., Andersson, K., Kovach, I. (Eds.), Evaluating the European Approach to Rural Development Grass-roots Experiences of the LEADER Programme. Ashgate Publisher pp. 33-51.

  • Esparcia, J., Escribano, J., Serrano, J.J. (2016a) ‘An analysis of social capital approach and its contribution to the study of local development processes’, Investigaciones Regionales – Journal of Regional Research, 34, pp. 49-71 [in Spanish].

  • Esparcia, J., Escribano, J., Serrano, J.J. (2016b) Analysis of the stock of social capital in rural areas [in Spanish]. Reports for Serranía Sur-Oeste Sevillana Local Action Group (Sevilla), 190 p.; Levante Almeriense Local Action Group (Almería), 204 p.; and Comarca de Guadix Local Action Group (Granada), 211 p. Rural Development Research Group-UDERVAL, University of Valencia. Mimeo.

  • European Commission (2000a) Women active in rural development. Assuring the future of rural Europe. 28 p. Available in (Accessed 20th of February, 2016).

  • European Commission (2000b) Guidelines for the Community Initiative for Rural Development Leader+. Official Journal of the European Communities, 18.5.2000 (2000/C 139/05). Available at (Accessed 20th of February, 2016)

  • European Commission (2006) The LEADER Approach. Basic Guide. 27 p. Available at (Accessed 20th of February, 2016).

  • European Parliament (2011) Report on the role of women in agriculture and rural areas. Available at (Accessed 20th of February, 2016).

  • García Lastra, M. (2006) ‘Mujeres Rurales: irreemplazables, vitales, imprescindibles, pero… ¿invisibles?’ In Calvo, A., García M. y Susinos, T. (eds.): Mujeres en la periferia: algunos debates sobre género y exclusión social, Barcelona: Icaria, D.L. 147-167 pp.

  • García Lastra, M. (2008) ‘Mujeres rurales españolas. La reivindicación de la identidad en un medio adverso’. In Maya Frades, A. (ed.): Mujeres rurales: estudios multidisciplinares de género, Salamanca: Ediciones universidad de Salamanca, 35-48 pp.

  • García Ramón, M.D., and Baylina, M. (eds.) (2000) El nuevo papel de la mujer en el desarrollo rural. Barcelona, Oikos Tau.

  • Gould, R. and Fernandez R. (1989) ‘Structures of mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Network’, Sociological Methodology, 19: 89-126 pp.

  • Hanneman, R., and Riddle, M. (2005) Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside.

  • Kabeer, N. (2005) ‘Gender equality and women’s empowerment: A critical analysis of the third millennium development goal 1’, Gender & Development, 13:1, pp. 13-24.

  • Kull, M. (2014) European Integration and Rural Development: Actors, Institutions and Power. Ashgate.

  • LEADER Observatory (1996) ‘Women, equal opportunities and rural development’, Leader Magazine, 11. (Accessed 20th of February, 2016).

  • Marsden, P.V. (1982) ‘Brokerage Behavior in Restricted Exchange Networks’, in Marsden, P.V., Lin, N., (Eds.) Social Structure and Network Analysis, Beverly Hills, Sage, pp. 201-18.

  • MARM – Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y MARINO (2011a) Plan estratégico para la igualdad de género en el desarrollo sostenible del medio rural (2011-2014), 58 p.

  • MARM - Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y MARINO (2011b) Grupos de Acción Local LEADER 2007-2013, 587 p. in (Accessed 20th of February, 2016).

  • Marquardt, D., Möllers, J., Buchenrieder, G. (2012) ‘Social Networks and Rural Development: LEADER in Romania’. Sociologia Ruralis, 52 (4), pp. 398-431.

  • Morris, C. and Little, J. (2005) ‘Rural work: an overview of women’s experiences’, in J. Little and C. Morris (Coords.) Critical studies in rural gender issues, Aldershot, Ashgate, pp. 9-26.

  • Muñoz-Goy, C. (2013) ‘Social capital in Spain: Are there gender inequalities?’. European Journal of Government and Economics (EJGE)”, Vol. 2, Nº 1, 79-94 pp.

  • Pérez-Rubio, J.A., Sánchez-Oro, M., García-García, Y. (coords.) (2015) Mujer rural en Extremadura. Proceso de empoderamiento y aportaciones al capital social. Univ. Extremadura, pp. 25-52.

  • Pallarès-Blanch, M. (2015) ‘Women’s eco-entrepreneurship: a possible pathway in social resilience?’. AGER - Journal of depopulation and rural development studies, 18: 65-89.

  • Pastor, C. and Esparcia, J. (1998) ‘Alternativas económicas en el ámbito rural interior. El papel de las mujeres en el desarrollo rural’. Cuadernos de Geografía, pp. 527-542.

  • REDR - Red Española de Desarrollo Rural (2016) El futuro se escribe en femenino. Estudio de diagnóstico de situación y factores que inciden en el acceso de las mujeres a los órganos de decisión y gestión de los Grupos de Acción local (GAL) asociados a la Red Española de Desarrollo Rural (REDR), en el periodo 2007-2014. 82 pp.

  • Sabaté, A. (2007) ‘El enfoque integrado de género en el desarrollo rural. Una condición imprescindible’. In Actualidad LEADER: Revista de desarrollo rural, Nº 35, 10-11 pp.

  • Sampedro, R. (1991) ‘El mercado de trabajo en el medio rural. Una aproximación a través del género’. Política y sociedad, Nº 8, 25-34 pp.

  • Sánchez-Oro, M., Pérez, J.A., Morán, M.I. (2011) ‘Mujer rural, capital social y asociacionismo en Extremadura’. In Vázquez, I. (coord.): Actas de III congreso universitario nacional “investigación y género, Universidad de Sevilla, 1825-1834 pp.

  • Shortall, S. (2008) ‘Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: Exploring the differences’, Journal of Rural Studies, 24, pp. 450-457.

  • Shucksmith, M. (2000) ‘Endogenous development, social capital and social inclusión: perspectives from LEADER in the UK’, Sociologia Ruralis, 40 (2), pp. 208-218.

  • Täube, V.G. (2004) ‘Measuring the Social Capital of Brokerage Roles’. Connections, 26 (1), pp. 29-52.

  • Wassermant, S., Faust, K. (1994): Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press.

  • Vercher, N., Escribano, J, y Navarro, JJ. (2015) ‘LEADER+ y género. El empoderamiento de la mujer en los espacios rurales va lencianos’. In IV Jornadas de sostenibilidad y desarrollo rural “El desarrollo sostenible y la calidad de vida en los núcleos rurales”. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 69-88 pp.


Journal + Issues