Should You Accept a Friends Request From Your Mother? And Other Filipino Dilemmas

Open access


This paper uses the concept of ‘cutting the network’ derived from the work of Marilyn Strathern to examine the relationship between two kinds of social network, that of kinship and the system of friends constructed on social networking sites. Specifically the material comes from a study of Filipina domestic workers and nurses in the UK and their relationship to their left behind children in the Philippines. A bilateral system of kinship can lead to a proliferation of relatives, while the use of the Friendster social networking site can lead to a proliferation of friends. It is when these two systems clash following the request by one's mother to become a friend that the constraints and problems posed by both systems comes into view. Cases show that it is possible to use social networking sites to help mothers become close friends for their absent children, but more commonly the increasing presence of actual mothers through new media disrupts the relationships that children had developed for themselves to a idealised projection of motherhood.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Anwar M. (1979) The Myth of Return. London: Heineman.

  • Asis M. (2008) ‘The Philippines’. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 17 (3-4): 349-378.

  • Beer D. (2008) ‘Social Network(ing) Sites…Revisiting the Story so Far: A response to danah boyd & Nicole Ellison’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13 (2): 516-529.

  • Boellstorff T. (2008) Coming of age in Second Life: an Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • boyd d. (2004) ‘Friendster and Publicly Articulated Social Networks’. Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems (CHI 2004). Vienna: ACM. Available at: (Consulted 10 July 2010).

  • boyd d. (2006) ‘Facebook's “Privacy Trainwreck”: Exposure Invasion and Drama’. Apophenia Blog. Available at: (Consulted 12 July 2010).

  • boyd d. (2010) ‘Friendship’. In Ito M. et al. Hanging Out Messing Around and Geeking Out: Living and Learning with New Media pp. 79-115. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • boyd d. m. & Ellison N. B. (2007) ‘Social network sites: Definition history and scholarship’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 210-230.

  • Cannell F. (1999) Power and intimacy in the Christian Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Carsten J. (2004) After Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Constable N. (1995) Romance of a Global Stage. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Constable N. (1997) Maid to Order in Hong Kong. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

  • Constable N. (1999) ‘At Home but Not at Home: Filipina Narratives of Ambivalent Returns’. Cultural Anthropology 14 (2): 203-228.

  • Dilley R. (1999) The Problem of Context. Oxford: Berg.

  • Facebook (2009) Facebook Statistics. Available at: (Consulted 25 March 2010)

  • Finch J. and J. Mason (2000) Passing On: Kinship and Inheritance in England. London: Routledge.

  • Gell A. (1999) ‘Strathernograms’. In Gell A. The Art of Anthropology: Essays and Diagrams pp. 29-75. London; Routledge.

  • Hargittai E. (2007) ‘Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites’. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1). Article 14. Available at: (Consulted 25 March 2010)

  • Hine C. (2000) Virtual Ethnography. London: Sage.

  • Horst H. (2009a) Aesthetics of the self: Digital mediations. In Miller D. Ed Anthropology and the Individual pp. 99-114. Oxford: Berg.

  • Horst H. (2010) ‘Families’. In Ito M. Hanging Out Messing Around and Geeking Out: Living and Learning with New Media pp. 149-194. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Horst H. and D. Miller (2005) ‘From Kinship to Link-up’. Current Anthropology 46(5): 755-778.

  • Horst H. and D. Miller (2006) The Cell Phone: An anthropology of communication. Oxford: Berg.

  • Ito Mizuko Sonja Baumer Matteo Bittanti danah boyd Rachel Cody Becky Herr Heather A. Horst Patricia G. Lange Dilan Mahendran Katynka Martinez C.J. Pascoe Dan Perkel Laura Robinson Christo Sims and Lisa Tripp. (2010). Hanging Out Messing Around Geeking Out: Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Johnson M. (1997) Beauty and Power. Oxford: Berg.

  • Jones G. and B. Schieffelin. (2009) ‘Enquoting voices accomplishing talk: Uses of be + like in Instant Messaging’. Language and Communication 29(1): 77-113.

  • Lamvik G. (2002) The Filipino Seafarer: A Life between Sacrifice and Shopping. Trondheim Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Dr. Art.

  • Livingstone S. (2008) ‘Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy privacy and self-expression’. New Media & Society 10 (3): 393-411.

  • Lynch F. and A. Guzman (1974) Four Readings on Philippine Values. Ateneo de Manila.

  • Mckay D. (2005) ‘Migration and the Sensuous Geographies of Re-emplacement in the Philippines’. Journal of Intercultural Studies 26(1-2): 75-91.

  • Mckay D. (2007) ‘Sending Dollars Shows Feelings: Emotions and Economies in Filipino Migration’. Mobilities 2(2): 175-194.

  • McKay D. (2009) ‘Borrowed lives: faith and debt in the Filipino diaspora Hong Kong and London’. Paper presented at the Sacred Journeys Diasporic Encounters Workshop Keele University Newcastle UK June 15 -17.

  • McKay D. (2012) Global Filipinos: Migrants’ Lives in the Virtual Village. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

  • Marlow C. (2009) ‘Maintained Relationships on Facebook’. Available at: (Consulted 05 March 2010).

  • Mauss M. (1954) The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Cohen and West.

  • Miller D. (1992) ‘The young and the restless in Trinidad: A case of the local and the global in mass consumption’. In R. Silverstone and E. Hirsch (eds.) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces pp. 163-182. London: Routledge.

  • Miller D. (2001) The Dialectics of Shopping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Miller D. (2007). ‘What is a relationship: Kinship as negotiated experience’. Ethnos 72(4): 535-554.

  • Miller D. (2008) The Comfort of Things. London: Polity Press.

  • Miller D. and D. Slater (2000) The Internet: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.

  • Moses A. (2009) ‘Friendster relocates to Australia’. Sydney Morning Herald 03 Feb. 2009. Available at: (Consulted 05 March 2010).

  • Multiply (2009) ‘Multiply Corporate Info’. Available at: (Consulted 22 June 2010).

  • Pahl R. (2000) On Friendship. Cambridge: Polity Press.

  • Parrenas R. (2001) Servants of Globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Parrenas R. (2005a) Children of Global Migration: Transnational Families and Gendered Woes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Parrenas R. (2005b) ‘Long distance intimacy: class gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Filipino transnational families’ Global Networks 5(4): 317-336.

  • Pertierra R. Ugarte E. Pingol A. Hernandez J. and N Dacanay (2002) TXT-ING Selves: Cellphones and Philippine Modernity Manila: De La Salle University Press.

  • Pertierra R. (2005) ‘Mobile Phones Identity and Discursive Intimacy’. Human Technology 1 (1): 23-44.

  • Pingol A. (2001) Remaking Masculinities: identity power and gender dynamics in families with migrant wives and househusbands. Manila: University of the Philippines Press.

  • Rafael V. (1993) Contracting Colonialism: Translation and Christian Conversion in Tagalog Society Under Early Spanish Rule. Durham: Duke University Press.

  • Rettberg J. (2008) Blogging. Cambridge: Polity.

  • Silverstone R. and Hirsh E. (1992) Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic spaces. London: Routledge.

  • Slater D. and Tacchi J. (2004) ‘Research: ICT innovations for Poverty Reduction’. Unesco. Available at: (Consulted 22 June 2010).

  • Strathern M. (1986) The Gender of the Gift: Problems With Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Strathern M. (1996) ‘Cutting the Network’ Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2(3): 517 – 535.

  • Strathern M. (2005) Partial connections. Walnuk Creek CA: Altamira Press.

  • Thrift N. (2005) Knowing capitalism. London: Sage.

  • Wilding R. (2006) ‘Virtual Intimacies? Families communicating across transnational contexts’. Global Networks 6(2): 125-142.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 189 93 1
PDF Downloads 117 77 2