Heterogeneity of the Notion of Interest in Accordance with the International Relations Theory: A Study of Russia’s National Interests

Open access


The category of a national interest is one of the most popular notions used in international relations. It has a polysemic character and is differently interpreted by various scientific perspectives. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief analysis of selected approaches of the theory of international relations to defining interests and correlating the interpretations of national interests of the Russian Federation performed on their bases. The choice of case study concerning the foreign policy of the Russian Federation is not accidental because in countries aspiring to gain world power the concept of national interest is raised while explaining the motives of decisions taken by their leaders exceptionally often. In this article, Russia’s interests will be discussed in reference to the annexation of the Crimea and Russia’s actions towards Ukraine. Those events vividly show the specificity of defining the national interests, based on one hand on the pursue to being a powerhouse and understanding the interests in the category of power and, on the other hand, resulting from the political identity of Russian elites. As a result, an assessment of the scientific utility of selected theoretical paradigms and their use in the analyses of Russia’s foreign policy will be outlined.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Arbatov A. Pochemu my ne ponimaem drug druga?”. “Voenno-promyshlenny Kurier” no. 28(344) 2010.

  • Areshev A. DOVSE. Ustarevshii Dogovor i Novye Realii.Mezhdunarodnaia Zhizn” no. 12 2007.

  • Baker P. Pressure Rising as Obama Works to Rein In Russia. “The New York Times” 2.03.2014.

  • Beom S.S. Russia’s Perspectives on International Politics: A Comparison of Liberalist Realist and Geopolitical Paradigms. “Acta Slavica Iaponica” no. (26) 2007.

  • Bogaturov A. Kontrrevolutsiia tsennostei i mezhdunarodnaia bezopasnost. “Mezhdunarodnyie Protsessy” no. 8(324) 2010.

  • Bordachev T. The limits of rational choice Russia in Global Affairs 4 October 2008.

  • Burchill S. The National Interest in International Relations Theory. London 2005.

  • Carr E.H. The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919–1939. New York: Perennial 2001.

  • Chazbijewicz S. Adwet czyli powrót. Walka polityczna Tatarów krymskich o zachowanie tożsamości narodowej i niepodległość państwa po II wojnie Światowej. Olsztyn 2001.

  • Clunan A. The Social Construction of Russia’s Resurgence: Aspirations Identity and Security Interests. Baltimore MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press 2009.

  • Cox R. Social Forces States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies” no. 10 1981.

  • Donnelly J. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000.

  • Finnemore M. National Interests in International Society. New York 1996.

  • Gilpin R. War and Change in World Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press1981.

  • Gostkiewicz M. Dwa obozy które mówią różnymi językami. Jak Rosja i Zachód bawią się w propagandowy głuchy telefon. „Gazeta Wyborcza” 28 March 2014.

  • Hall R.B. Moral Authority as a Power Resource. “International Organization” no. 51(4) 1997.

  • Hamilton College Levitt Poll. The Russian Elite 2016. Web. https://www.hamilton.edu/documents/russian%20elite%202016%20final%20ppt.pdf.

  • Hopf T. Crimea is ours: A discursive history. “International Relations” no. 30(2) 2016.

  • Hopf T. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities & Foreign Policies Moscow 1955 and 1999. London: Cornell University Press 2002.

  • Jusufaj E. The Kosovo Precedent in the Secession and Recognition of Crimea. “ILIRIA International Review” 01 2015.

  • Kapuśniak T. Ukraina jako obszar wpływów międzynarodowych po zimnej wojnie Warsaw 2008.

  • Karaganov S. Lucky Russia. Russia in global affairs. 23 March 2011. Web. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/pubcol/Lucky-Russia-15154.

  • Kelly L. Carbonnel Alissa de. Russian markets plunge as Putin tightens Crimea grip. Web. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/03/03/us-ukraine-crisis-idUSBREA1Q1E82014030.

  • Keohane R.O. Joseph S. Nye Power and Interdependence. New York 2001

  • Kropatcheva E. Russian Foreign Policy in the Realm of European Security through the Lens of Neoclassical Realism. “Journal of Eurasian Studies” no. 3 2012.

  • Levada Center Poll. Russia’s role in the world. Web. 25 March 2015 https://www.levada.ru/en/2015/03/25/russia-s-role-in-the-world.

  • Levada Center Poll. Sankcii: ocenki i ożydanija. Web. 28 August 2014 http:levada.ru/2014/08/28/sanktsii-otsenki-i-ozhidaniya/.

  • Lobell S.E. Ripsman N.M Taliaferro J.W. (eds.). Neoclassical realism the State and foreign policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009.

  • Makarychev A. Russia Ukraine and the Eastern Partnership: From Common Neighborhood to Spheres of Influence? “Insight Turkey” no. 16(3) 2014. Web. http://file.insightturkey.com/Files/Pdf/russia-ukraine.pdf.

  • Moravscik A. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. “International Organization” vol. 51 no. 4 1997.

  • Morgenthau H.J. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Knopf 1985.

  • Murray R. The Return of the Problem-Solvers. Web. http:e-ir.info/2014/03/19/the-return-of-the-problem-solvers/.

  • Primakov Y. Rossiya ishchet novoe mesto v mire. “Izvestiya” 6 March 1996.

  • Putin V. Address by President of the Russian Federation. 18.03.2014. Web. http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20603.

  • Putin V. Putin deplores collapse of USSR. “BBC News”. Web. 25. April 2005 http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/4480745.stm.

  • Putin V. Reception to Mark 1000 Years since the Death of St. Vladimir Equal-to-the-Apostles. Web. 28 July 2015 http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50068.

  • Putin V. Vladimir Putin has been Sworn in as President of Russia. Web. 7 May 2018 http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/57416.

  • Ruggie J.G. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London 1998.

  • Russian National Security Strategy. Web. December 2015 http://www.ieee.es/Galerias/fichero/OtrasPublicaciones/Internacional/2016/Russian-National-Security-Strategy-31Dec2015.pdf.

  • Sadłocha J. Krytyczna analiza kategorii interesu w teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Wrocław 2015.

  • Schweller R.L. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest. New York 1998.

  • Shea A. Ukraine: Putin’s postmodern moment and the politics of truth. Web. 11 March 2014 http://conflictandsecurity.com/blog/ukraine-putins-postmodern-moment-and-the-politics-of-truth.

  • Singer J.D. The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations [in:] K. Knorr and S. Verba (eds.). The International System: Theoretical Essays. New York 1961.

  • Slobodchikoff M.O. Douglas Davis G. Roots of Russian Soft Power: Rethinking Russian National Identity. “Comparative Politics Russia” no. 2 2017.

  • Strategiya natsional’noy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2020 goda. Web. 12 May 2009 http://www.kremlin.ru/supplement/424.

  • Tsygankov A. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. New York: Rowman & Littlefield 2010.

  • Tsygankov A. Russia’s Power and Alliances in the 21st century. “Politics” no. 30(4) 2010.

  • Vasquez J. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998.

  • Waltz K. Struktura teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Warsaw: Scholar 2010.

  • Weldes J. Constructing National Interests: the United States and the Cuban missile crisis. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press1999.

  • Wendt A. Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics. “International Organization” vol. 46 no. 2 1992.

  • Wendt A. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1999.

  • Wielomski A. Putinowska inna rzeczywistość. Web. http://www.konserwatyzm.pl/artykul/11851/putinowska-inna-rzeczywistosc.

  • Wierzbowska-Miazga A. Konsekwencje aneksji Krymu. Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich Web. 19 March 2014 http://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/analizy/2014–03–19/konsekwencje-aneksji-krymu.

  • Williams M. The Realist Tradition and Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.

  • Wohlforth W.C. The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the Cold War. Ithaca 1993.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 107 107 55
PDF Downloads 32 32 8