Screening of the aerodynamic and biophysical properties of barley malt

Open access


An understanding of the aerodynamic and biophysical properties of barley malt is necessary for the appropriate design of equipment for the handling, shipping, dehydration, grading, sorting and warehousing of this strategic crop. Malting is a complex biotechnological process that includes steeping; germination and finally, the dehydration of cereal grains under controlled temperature and humidity conditions. In this investigation, the biophysical properties of barley malt were predicted using two models of artificial neural networks as well as response surface methodology. Stepping time and germination time were selected as the independent variables and 1 000 kernel weight, kernel density and terminal velocity were selected as the dependent variables (responses). The obtained outcomes showed that the artificial neural network model, with a logarithmic sigmoid activation function, presents more precise results than the response surface model in the prediction of the aerodynamic and biophysical properties of produced barley malt. This model presented the best result with 8 nodes in the hidden layer and significant correlation coefficient values of 0.783, 0.767 and 0.991 were obtained for responses one thousand kernel weight, kernel density, and terminal velocity, respectively. The outcomes indicated that this novel technique could be successfully applied in quantitative and qualitative monitoring within the malting process.

Agu R.C. and Palmer G.H., 2003. Pattern of nitrogen distribution in barley grains grown in the field. J. I. Brewing., 109(2), 110-113.

Arab Amerian F., 2011. Inspecting the Effect of Steeping and Germination Periods on the amount of Enzyme activity in Barley Seed (in Persian). Islamic Azad University of Sabzevar, Sabzevar, Iran.

Baş D. and Boyacı İ.H., 2007. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. J. Food. Eng., 78(3), 836-845.

Briggs D.E., 1998. Malt and Malting. London: Blackie Academic and Professional, UK.

Briggs D.E., Hough J.S., Stevens R., and Young T.W., 1991. Malting and Brewing Science: Malt and Sweet Wort. London, Chapman and Hall.

Celus I., Brijs K., and Delcour J.A., 2006. The effects of malting and mashing on barley protein extractability. J. Cereal. Sci., 44(2), 203-211.

Dendy D.A.V. and Dobraszczyk B.J., 2001. Cereals and Cereal Products, Chemistry and Technology. Maryland, USA, Aspen Publishers Inc., Gaitsburg.

Dolatabadi Z., Elhami Rad A.H., Farzaneh V., Akhlaghi Feizabad S.H., Estiri S.H., and Bakhshabadi H., 2016. Modeling of the lycopene extraction from tomato pulps. Food. Chem., 190(0), 968-973.

Draper N.R., 1992. Introduction to Box and Wilson (1951) On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions. In: Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution (Eds S. Kotz, N.L. Johnson). Springer, New York, USA.

Eneje L.O., Ogu E.O., Aloh C.U., Odibo F.J.C., Agu R.C., and Palmer G.H., 2004. Effect of steeping and germination time on malting performance of Nigerian white and yellow maize varieties. Process. Biochem., 39(8), 1013-1016.

Farzaneh V. and Carvalho I.S., 2015. A review of the health benefit potentials of herbal plant infusions and their mechanism of actions. Ind. Crop. Prod., 65, 247-258.

Goñi S.M., Oddone S., Segura JA., Mascheroni R.H., and Salvadori V.O., 2008. Prediction of foods freezing and thawing times: Artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. J. Food. Eng., 84(1), 164-178.

Hill W.J. and Hunter W.G., 1966. A Review Of Response surface Methodology: A Literature Survey. Techometrics, 8(4), 571-590.

Home S., Stenholm K., Wilhelmson A., and Autio K., 1998. Properties of starch and cell wall components and their effects on processing. Cereal. Chem., 75, 4.

Hossieni ghaboss S.H., 2004. Inspecting of malting quality of barley varieties and lines in Golestan province (in Persian). Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.

Jabrayili S., Farzaneh V., Zare Z., Bakhshabadi H., Babazadeh Z., Mokhtarian M., Carvalho S.I., 2016. Modelling of mass transfer kinetic in osmotic dehydration of kiwifruit. Int. Agrophys., 30(2), 185-191.

Kashaninejad M., Mortazavi A., Safekordi A., and Tabil L.G., 2006. Some physical properties of Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) nut and its kernel. J. Food. Eng., 72(1), 30-38.

Koc A.B., Heinemann P.H., and Ziegler G.R., 2007. Optimization of whole milk powder processing variables with neural networks and genetic algorithms. Food. Bioprod. Process., 85(4), 336-343.

Lamorski K., Pachepsky Y., Sławiński C., and Walczak R.T., 2008. Using support vector machines to develop pedotransfer functions for water retention of soils in Poland. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72(5), 1243-1247.

Madadlou A., Emam-Djomeh Z., Mousavi M.E., Ehsani M., Javanmard M., and Sheehan D., 2009. Response surface optimization of an artificial neural network for predicting the size of re-assembled casein micelles. Comput. Electron. Agr., 68(2), 216-221.

Mateo F., Gadea R., Mateo E.M., and Jiménez M., 2011. Multilayer perceptron neural networks and radial-basis function networks as tools to forecast accumulation of deoxynivalenol in barley seeds contaminated with Fusarium culmorum. Food. Control., 22(1), 88-95.

McCleary B.V. and Shameer I., 1987. Assay of malt β-Glucanase using azo-barley glucan: An improved presipitant. J. I. Brewing., 93(2), 87-90.

Menlik T., Özdemir M.B., and Kirmaci V., 2010. Determination of freeze-drying behaviors of apples by artificial neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7669-7677.

Momenzadeh L., Zomorodian A., and Mowla D., 2011. Experimental and theoretical investigation of shelled corn drying in a microwave-assisted fluidized bed dryer using Artificial Neural Network. Food. Bioprod. Process., 89(1), 15-21.

Razavi M.A. and Akbari R., 1998. Biochemical characteristics of agricultural products and nutrients (in Persian). Ferdowsi University Press.

Rostami M., Farzaneh V., Boujmehrani A., Mohammadi M., and Bakhshabadi H., 2014. Optimizing the extraction process of sesame seed’s oil using response surface method on the industrial scale. Ind. Crop. Prod., 58, 160-165.

Tian B., Xie B., Shi J., Wu J., Cai Y., Xu T., Xue S., and Deng Q., 2010. Physicochemical changes of oat seeds during germination. Food. Chem., 119(3), 1195-1200.

USDA, 2010. United States Department of Agriculture. Foreign Agricultural Service. Office of Global Analysis. Washington, DC, USA International Production Assessment Division.

International Agrophysics

The Journal of Institute of Agrophysics of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.242
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.267

CiteScore 2017: 1.38

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.435
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.849


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 101 101 13
PDF Downloads 39 39 7