Magnetic stimulation of marigold seed

Open access


The effects of magnetic field treatments of French marigold seeds on germination, early seedling growth and biochemical changes of seedlings were studied under controlled conditions. For this purpose, seeds were exposed to five different magnetic seed treatments for 3 min each. Most of seed treatments resulted in improved germination speed and spread, root and shoot length, seed soluble sugars and a-amylase activity. Magnetic seed treatment with 100 mT maximally improved germination, seedling vigour and starch metabolism as compared to control and other seed treatments. In emergence experiment, higher emergence percentage (4-fold), emergence index (5-fold) and vigorous seedling growth were obtained in seeds treated with 100 mT. Overall, the enhancement of marigold seeds by magnetic seed treatment with 100 mT could be related to enhanced starch metabolism. The results suggest that magnetic field treatments of French marigold seeds have the potential to enhance germination, early growth and biochemical parameters of seedlings.

Afzal I., Ashraf S., Qasim M., Basra S.M.A., and Shahid M., 2009. Does halopriming improve germination and seedling vigour in marigold. Seed Sci. Technol., 37, 436-445.

Aladjadjiyan A., 2010. Influence of stationary magnetic field on lentil seeds. Int. Agrophys., 24, 321-324. AOSA, 1983. Handbook of Association of Official Seed Analysts. Lincoln, NE, USA.

Balouchi H.R. and Sanavy S.A.M.M., 2009. Electromagnetic field impact on annual medics and dodder seed germination Int. Agrophysics, 23, 111-115.

Belyavskaya N.A., 2004. Biological effects due to weak magnetic field on plants. Adva. Spa. Res., 34, 1566-1574.

Carbonell M.V., Martinez E., and Amaya J.M., 2000. Stimulation of germination in rice (Oryza sativa L.) by a static magnetic field. J. Electromag. Biol. Med., 19, 121-128.

De SouzaA.,GarciaD., SueiroL.,GilartF.,PorrasE., andLicea L., 2006. Pre-sowing magnetic seed treatments of tomato seeds increase the growth and yield of plants. Bioelectromag., 27, 247-257.

Kaul V.K., Singh V., and Singh B., 2000. Damask rose and marigold: prospective industrial crops. J. Med. Aroma Plant Sci., 22, 313-318.

Kurinobu S. and Okazaki Y., 1995. Dielectric constant and conductivity of one seed in germination process. Proc. Ann. Conf. IEEE/IAS, May 3-5, Orlano, FL, USA.

Moon J.D., and Chung H.S., 2000. Acceleration of germination of tomato seed by applying AC electric and magnetic fields. J. Electrostat., 48, 103-114.

Nimmi V. and Madhu G., 2009. Effect of pre-sowing treatment with permanent magnetic field on germination and growth of chilli (Capsicum annum. L.). Int. Agrophysics, 23, 195-198.

Pietruszewski S. and Kania K., 2010. Effect of magnetic field on germination and yield of wheat. Int. Agrophys., 24, 297-302.

Podleoeny J., Pietruszewski S., and Podleoena A., 2005. Influence of magnetic stimulation of seeds on formation of morphological features and yielding of pea. Int Agrophysics, 19, 1-8.

Rochalska M. and Grabowska K., 2007. Influence of magnetic fields on activity of enzyme: a- and b-amylase and glutathione S-transferase (GST) in wheat plants. Int. Agrophysics, 21, 185-188.

Thimmaiah S.R., 2004. Standard Methods of Biochemical Analysis. Kalyani Press, New Dehli, India.

Varavinit S., Chaokasem N., and Shobsngob S., 2002. Immobilization of a thermostable a-amylase. Sci. Asia, 28, 247-251.

Vashisth A. and Nagarajan S., 2008. Exposure of seeds to static magnetic field enhances germination and early growth characteristics in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Bioelectromag, 29, 571-578.

Yinan Y., Yuan L., Yongqing Y., and Chunyang L., 2005. Effect of seed pretreatment by magnetic field on the sensitivity of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) seedlings to ultraviolet-B radiation. Environ. Exp. Bot., 54, 286-294.

International Agrophysics

The Journal of Institute of Agrophysics of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.242
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.267

CiteScore 2017: 1.38

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.435
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.849

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 263 263 26
PDF Downloads 133 133 12