From a well-prepared teacher to an on-the-spot facilitator: a reflection on delivering an active learning course
Abstract
In this article, I describe my experience of preparing and delivering a brand new computing undergraduate course in a new university and in doing so, share how the special institutional push of the active learning pedagogy of the university changed the way I prepared and delivered the course, and ended up transforming my own view of teaching. I was faced with an unusual cohort of students who were already familiar with active learning styles in classes, were proactive, vocal, and argumentative, were not afraid of making mistakes and of challenging the authorities, were extremely articulate expressing themselves and who had worked in a project- and team-based setting throughout the programme. As such, a very different method of teaching needed to be in place, not for the purpose of improving the in-class engagement, but out of necessity. In the process of creating and running this course, I witnessed a major shift in the allocation of my time, efforts and other resources: from general to specific, from teaching to advising to observing, from elaborate preclass preparations to impromptu, in-class discussions, thus bringing all my design skills and experiences to the table.
[1] Calabro, K. M., Kiger, K. T., Lawson, and W, Zhang. G. (2008). New directions in freshman Engineering Design at the University of Maryland. ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. T2D: 6-11
[2] Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. Basel: Birkhauser
[3] Freeman, S., Eddy, S., McDonough, M., Smith, M., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. and Wenderoth, M. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111 (23)
[4] Giordano, P.J., and Hammer, E.Y. (1999). In-class collaborative learning: practical suggestions from the teaching trenches. Teaching Psychology, 26(1), 42-44
[5] Goh, K., Goodman, P., & Weingart, L. (2013). Team innovation processes: an examination of activity cycles in creative project teams. Small Group Research, 44, 159-194
[6] King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41(1), 30
[7] Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think (4th Ed.). London, U.K.: Routledge
[8] Lee H, Mohamad Ali N and Hardman L. (2013). Designing interactive applications to support novel activities. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction. Vol. 2013, ISSN: 1687-5893
[9] Lee H and Smeaton A.F. (2009). Interaction platform-orientated perspective in designing novel applications. Create 2009- Creative Inventions and Innovations for Everyday HCI, London, U.K., 1-2 July 2009
[10] Linsey, J., Talley, A., White, C. K., Jensen, D., and Wood, K. L. (2009). From tootsie rolls to broken bones: an innovative approach for active learning in mechanics of materials. ASEE Journal of Advances in Engineering Education (AEE), 1(3), 1-23
[11] Stewart, V. (2012). Transforming learning in cities: the global cities education network inaugural symposium. Asia Society Partnership for Global Learning. Hong Kong, May 10-12, 2012.
[12] Souas, D. (2000). How the brain learns. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
[13] Telenko, C., Camburn, B., Holtta-Otto, K., Wood, K., and Otto, K. (2014). Designettes: new approaches to multidisciplinary engineering design education. ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Buffalo, NY, U.S.A., 17-20 August, 2014
[14] Thomas, J. (1972). The variation of memory with time for information appearing during a lecture. Studies in Adult Education, 4, 57-62
[15] Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2007). Active learning in practice at the university level. Tracey Tokuhama-Espinosa (http://traceytokuhama.com/). Available online at: http://traceytokuhama.com/publications/papers-unpublished/active-learning-inpractice-at-the-university-level/261
[16] Tsai F, Natarajan K, Ahipasaoglu S, Chau Y, Lee H, Cheung N, Ruths J, Huang S and Magnanti T. (2013). From boxes to bees: active learning in freshmen calculus. The 4th Annual IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON 2013), Berlin, Germany, 13-15 March 2013
[17] Wood, K., Mohan, R., Kaijima, S., Dritsas, S., Frey, D., White, C., Jensen, D., Crawford, R., Moreno, D., and Pey, K. (2012). A symphony of designettes exploring the boundaries of design thinking in engineering education. 119th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, U.S.A., 10 -13 June, 2012
