The load-carrying capacity, is one of the indicators used to assess airfield pavement conditions. It could be estimated by evaluating the response of stationary dynamic loads, using a deflectometric device that simulates the stress inducted by an aircraft moving at moderate speed. This device is widely used because tests are nondestructive and rapid to execute and can be conducted for cyclic investigations, providing valuable support to maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) decision makers through pavement management system (PMS). Pavement response is evaluated as a function of the deflection basin induced by the deflectometric device. It is well known that deflectometric measurements are influenced by external parameters such as weather conditions, especially temperature of upper layers or the percentage of water contained on unbounded layers. In this study the deflections basin response obtained for different load and weather conditions has been analyzed through the application of benchmarking values for immediately structural assessments. Tests were performed using the Heavy Weight Deflectometer (HWD) on 9 points along five longitudinal alignments from the centerline, 0.00 m, ± 3.00 m, and ± 5.20 m. The benchmarking methodology was used to evaluate and compare runway pavement performance under different weather conditions and testing loads. The applied benchmarking methodology resulted an easy and rapid assessment tool of pavement conditions at network-level.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
Briggs R. C. & Lukanen E. O. 2000. Variations in Backcalculated Pavement Layer Moduli in LTPP Seasonal Monitoring Sites. s.l.:ASTM.
Carvalho R. et al. 2012. Simplified Techniques for Evaluation and Interpretation of Pavement Deflections for Network-Level Analysis. s.l.:s.n. COST 336 A. 1998. Information gathering report s.l.: s.n.
Donovan P. & Tutumluer E. 2009. Use of Falling Weight Deflectometer testing to determine relative damage in asphalt pavement unbound aggregate layers. s.l. s.n.
FAA AC 150/5370-11B 2011. AC 150/5370-11B - Use of Nondestructive Testing in the Evaluation of Airports Pavements. s.l.:FAA.
Gadafa D. Hossain M. Miller R. & Van T. 2010. Estimation of Remaining Service Life of Flexible Pavements from Surface Deflections. Journal of Trasportation Engineering 136(4) pp. 342-352.
Haas R. 1995. Principles and Apllications of Pavement Management. Singapore Second International Conference on Road and Airfield Pavement Technology Vol.1.
Horak E. 2007. Surface moduli determined with the falling weight deflectometer used as benchmarking tool. Pretoria ZA s.n.
Horak E. 2008. Benchmarking the structural condition of flexible pavements with deflection bowl parameters. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering 50(2) pp. 2-9.
Horak E. 2009. Evaluation of airport pavements with FWD deflection bowl parameter benchmarking methodology. Amsterdam s.n.
Paine D. 1998. The incorporation of structural data in a pavement management system. s.l. 4th International Conference on Managing Pavements.
Peddibhotla S. Murphy M. & Zhang Z. 2011. Validation and Implementation of the Structural Condition Index (SCI) for Network-level Pavement Evaluation s.l.: s.n.
Shahin M. 2005. Pavement Management for Airports Roads and Parking Lots. s.l.:s.n.
Thompson M. & Cation K. 1986. A Proposed Full-Depth Asphalt Concrete Thickness Design Procedure s.l.: Civil Engineering Series No. 45 Illinois Cooperative Highway and Transportation Series No. 213.
Ullidtz P. Zhang W. & Baltzer S. 2000. Validation of Pavement Response and performance models. s.l.:s.n.