Comparative Structural Analysis of Flexible Pavements Using Finite Element Method

Open access


The evaluation of bituminous concrete mixes for their tendency to rutting has been an important research field for many years. Rutting is a major type of distress encountered in bituminous pavements. The Finite Element Method (FEM) is a numerical analysis technique to obtain various structural parameters such as stress, strain and deflection of pavement layers. The objective of this paper is to study the sensitivity of these variables in reducing the vertical surface deflections, the critical tensile strains at the bottom of the bitumen layer and the critical compressive strains on the top of subgrade using the finite element method. This study has been carried out in order to compare the performance of flexible pavement using the finite element method and KENLAYER. Vertical surface deflections in flexible pavements have always been a major concern and are used as a criterion for pavement design. It is desirable to reduce the deflections as much as possible. This paper deals with ways to reduce deflections by varying the design configuration, such as increasing the Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) modulus, the base modulus, sub base modulus and the subgrade modulus. Another objective of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of two different methods in reducing vertical surface deflections (wo) and the critical tensile strains in the bitumen layer (εt) or the radial strains at the bottom layer of HMA. The finite element method was adopted to evaluate the effectiveness of the two methods and the sensitivity of various factors

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Abed A.H. and Al-Azzawi A.A. (2012) “Evaluation of Rutting Depth in Flexible Pavements by Using Finite Element Analysis and Local Empirical Model” American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences Vol. 5 No. 2 pp. 163-169.

  • Asphalt Institute (1982). Research and Development of Asphalt Institute’s Thickness Design Manual. 9th Ed. Research Report 82-2 The Asphalt Institute.

  • Boussinesq J. (1885) “Application des potentiels á l'étude de l'équilibre et du movement des solidesélastique” Paris: Gauthier-Villard.

  • Burmister D.M. (1945) “The General Theory of Stresses and Displacements in Layered Soil Systems” Journal of Applied Physics. Vol. 16 pp. 89-94 126-127 296-302.

  • Duncan J.M. and Chang C.Y. (1970) "Nonlinear Analysis of Stress and Strain in Soils" ASCE Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division 96 (SM5) pp. 1629-1653.

  • Drucker D.C. and Prager W. (1952) "Soil Mechanics and Plastic Analysis of Limit Design" Quarterly Applied Mathematics Vol.10 No.2 pp. 157-164.

  • Gupta A. Kumar P. and Rastogi R. (2014) “Critical Review of Flexible Pavement Performance Models” Korean Society of Civil Engineers (KSCE) Journal of Civil Engineering Springer Vol. 18 No. 1 pp. 142-148.

  • Huang Y.H. (1993) “Pavement Analysis and Design” Englewood Cliffs New Jersey Prentice-Hall.

  • Oscarsson E. and Popescu L. (2011) “Evaluation of the CalME Permanent Deformation Model for Asphalt Concrete Layers” International Journal of Pavement Research Technology Vol. 4 No. 1 pp. 21-33.

  • Schiffman R.L. (1962) “General Solution of Stresses and Displacements in Layered Elastic Systems” Proceeding of International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavement University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA.

  • Schofield A.N. and Wroth C.P. (1968) Critical State Soil Mechanics McGraw Hill London.

  • Yandell W.O. (1971) “Prediction of the Behavior of Elastoplastic Roads During Repeated Rolling Using the Mechano-Lattice Analogy” Highway Research Record Highway Research Board No. 374 pp. 29-41.

Journal information
Cited By
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 278 156 9
PDF Downloads 513 450 86