Hull-form optimization of KSUEZMAX to enhance resistance performance

Open access

ABSTRACT

This paper deploys optimization techniques to obtain the optimum hull form of KSUEZMAX at the conditions of full-load draft and design speed. The processes have been carried out using a RaPID-HOP program. The bow and the stern hull-forms are optimized separately without altering neither, and the resulting versions of the two are then combined. Objective functions are the minimum values of wave-making and viscous pressure resistance coefficients for the bow and stern. Parametric modification functions for the bow hull-form variation are SAC shape, section shape (U-V type, DLWL type), bulb shape (bulb height and size); and those for the stern are SAC and section shape (U-V type, DLWL type). WAVIS version 1.3 code is used for the potential and the viscous-flow solver. Prior to the optimization, a parametric study has been conducted to observe the effects of design parameters on the objective functions. SQP has been applied for the optimization algorithm. The model tests have been conducted at a towing tank to evaluate the resistance performance of the optimized hull-form. It has been noted that the optimized hull-form brings 2.4% and 6.8% reduction in total and residual resistance coefficients compared to those of the original hull-form. The propulsive efficiency increases by 2.0% and the delivered power is reduced 3.7%, whereas the propeller rotating speed increases slightly by 0.41 rpm.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Chen P.F. Huang C.H. Fang H.C. and Chou J.H. 2006. An inverse design approach in determining the optimal shape of bulbous bow with experimental verification. Journal of Ship Research 50(1) pp.1-14.

  • Choi H.J. Chun H.H. and Jeong S.H. 2004. Fundamental study for the development of an optimum hull form. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology 18(3) pp.32-39.

  • Choi H.J. Chun H.H. Park I.R and Kim J. 2011. Panel cutting method: new approach to generate panels on a hull in Rankine source potential approximation. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 3(4) pp.225-232.

  • Choi H.J. Chun H.H. and Jeong S.H. 2005. Fundamental Study for the Development of an Optimum Hull Form. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Technology 18(3) pp.32-39.

  • Choi H.J. Seo K.C. Kim B.E. and Chun H.H. 2003. Development of an optimum hull form for a container ship with minimum wave resistance. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea 40(4) pp.8-15.

  • Choi H.J. Kim H.J. Chun H.H. and Jung K.H. 2006. Hull form optimization by modification of bell-shaped distribution. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea 43(5) pp.550-559.

  • Choi J.E. Min K.S. Kim J.H. Lee S.B. and Seo H.W. 2010. Resistance and propulsion characteristics of various commercial ships based on CFD results. Ocean Engineering 37(7) pp.549-566.

  • Dejhalla R. Mrsa Z. and Vukokic S. 2002. A genetic algorithm approach to the problem of minimum ship wave resistance. Marine Technology 39(3) pp.187-195.

  • Duvigneau R. Visonneau M. and Deng G.B. 2003. On the pole played by turbulence closures in hull shape optimization at model and full scale. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 8(1) pp.11-25.

  • Han S.H. Lee Y.S. and Choi Y.B. 2012. Hydrodynamic hull form optimization using parametric models. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 17 pp.1-17.

  • Harries S. Abt C. and Heimann J. 2003. From redesign to optimal hull line by means of parametric modeling. 2nd International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Technology in the Maritime Industries (COMPIT 2003) Hamburg Germany May 2003.

  • Jacpuin E. Derbanne Q. bellèvre D. Cordier S. and Alessandrini B. 2004. Hull form optimization using a free surface RANSE solver. 25thSymposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. Newfoundland Canada 8-13 August 2004.

  • Kim H.J. 2008. Parametric modification function based multiobjective optimization for ship design. Ph.D. Thesis. Pusan National University.

  • Kim H.J. Chi Y. Kim H.Y. and Chun H.H. 2010. A combined local and global hull form modification approach for hydrodynamic optimization. 28th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. California Institute of Technology in Pasadena U.S.A. 12-17 September 2010.

  • Kim H.J. and Chun H.H. 2000. Hull form generation of minimum wave resistance by a nonlinear optimization method. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea 37(4) pp.11-18.

  • Kim H.J. Choi H.J. and Chun H.H. 2007a. A pactical hull form optimization method using the parametric modification function. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea 44(5) pp.590-600.

  • Kim H.J. Chun H.H. and Choi H.J. 2007b. Development of CFD based stern form optimization method. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea 44(6) pp.564-571.

  • Kim H.J. Chun H.H. and An N.H. 2008. Hull form optimization using parametric modification functions and global optimization. Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea 45(6) pp.542-550.

  • Kim J. Kim K.S. Kim Y.C. Van S.H. and Kim H.C. 2011. Comparison of potential and viscous methods for the nonlinear ship wave problem. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 3(3) pp.159-173.

  • Kim W.J. Kim D.H. and Van S.H. 2002. Computational study on turbulent flows around modern tanker hull forms. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 38(4) pp.377-406.

  • Kim W.J. and Van S.H. 2000. Comparisons of turbulent flows around two modern VLCC hull forms. Proceedings workshop on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics: Gothenburg 2000 Gothenburg Sweden 8-10 December 2010.

  • Lackenby H. 1950. On the systematic geometrical variation of ship forms. Transactions of RINA 92 pp.289-316.

  • Lowe T.W. and Steel J. 2003. Conceptual hull design using a genetic algorithm. Journal of Ship Research 47 pp.222-236.

  • Min K.S. Choi J.E. Yum D.J. Shon S.H. Chung S.H. and Park D.W. 2002. Study on the CFD application for VLCC hull-form design. Proceedings of the 23rd ONR Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics. Val de Reuil France 17-22 September 2002.

  • Nowachi H. 1993. Hull form variation and evaluation. Journal of the Kansai Society of Naval Architects 219 pp.173-184.

  • Peri D. and Campana E.F. 2005. High-fidelity models and multiobjective global optimization algorithms in simulationbased design. Journal of Ship Research 49(3) pp.159-175.

  • Pinto A. Peri D. and Campana E.F. 2007. Multiobjective optimization of a containership using deterministic particle swarm optimization. Journal of Ship Research 51(3) pp.217-228.

  • Ragab S.A. 2001. An adjoint formulation for shape optimization in free-surface potential flow. Journal of Ship Research 45 pp.269-278.

  • Rao S.S. 1999. Engineering optimization: theory and practice. 3rd Ed. New Jersey: Wiley-Interscience.

  • Saha G.K. Suzuki K. and Kai H. 2004. Hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms in shallow water. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 9 pp.51-62.

  • Softley J. and Schiller T.R. 2002. An approach to advanced ship design using parametric design templates. Transactions - Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers 110 pp.245-258.

  • Suzuki K. Kai H. and Saha G.K. 2004. Hydrodynamic optimization of ship hull forms in shallow water. Journal of Marine Science and Technology. 21(2) pp.277-284.

  • Tahara Y. Stern F. and Himeno Y. 2004. Computational fluid dynamics-based optimization of surface combatant. Journal of Ship Research 48(4) pp.273-287.

  • Tahara Y. Tohyama S. and Katsui T. 2006. CFD-based multi-objective optimization method for ship design. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluid 52(5) pp.499-527.

  • Tahara Y. Peri D. Campana E.F. and Stern F. 2008. Computational fluid dynamics-based multi-objective optimization of a surface combatant using a global optimization method. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 13(2) pp. 95-116.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.930
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.997

CiteScore 2018: 2.03

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.826
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.741

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 240 75 3
PDF Downloads 127 27 7